Since it reduces STDs, there's a medical argument to be made for circumcision.
Fuck, thread derailed.
Since it reduces STDs, there's a medical argument to be made for circumcision.
Fuck, thread derailed.
Yea, the two things themselves, are apples to oranges, but letting the kid have the choice or not is not an apple to orange again, your kid could be one of those lolreligious people!
And again, circumcisions can be undone. If you don't like your cut penis, go get it undone.
I had no idea there was now a surgical procedure to restore foreskin.
There is but there no point in doing it.
I think we should focus on how Tyche made his only son gay by naming him camden parker
Wtf you talking about? Tyche mentioned circumcision knowing full well it would spark debate and banter.
Well, to be fair, if you're going to make 100% sure your kid fucks dudes in the butt by naming him Camden Parker, you probably should give him some extra protection against HIV.
Do you have double aids bc ur a gay black guy?
In the US?
cause ya know
but get madder at a jokeCDC statistics show that in 2008, 73% of persons living with a diagnosis of HIV infection were male adults or adolescents.
Over half (63%) of adult and adolescent males living with an HIV diagnosis in 2008 became infected through male-to-male sexual contact, around 17% of those diagnosed were infected through injecting drug use and 12% through heterosexual contact.![]()
Actually, they can't, not until you can figure out how to use stem cell therepy to regrow the nerves and frenulum back anyways. You can make it "look" like there's a foreskin, but it's not a foreskin, and is nothing more than a piece of flesh stuck on, and most people who get surgery to restore it are very unsatisfied. You can also spend years stretching the skin manually via T-taping or the like, which looks more natural and works better, but you still can't regrow the nerves back.
On the other hand, they can always you know, have an ADULT circumcision (gasp!). If they don't like it, let them decide when they're old enough to choose, and I mean as adults. Otherwise we'd have tons of parents bullying their children into getting one when they don't even understand their own religion for sure yet.
I've nothing against circumcision. I have plenty of issues against infantile circumcision without a damn good reason, and religion/looks are not a damn good reason. It had better be life threatening.
You're not against circumcision, but the decision to do it better be life threatening? Unless there's a cancer of the foreskin with a risk of metastasizing to the kidneys, then you're against circumcision.