Kuya

[Sera]

Can we talk about this article? I can think of no one else I'd rather discuss this with.


http://www.foxnews.com/opinion/2012/...sident-really/

Former Speaker of the House and Republican presidential candidate Newt Gingrich was attacked Thursday in an interview on ABC News by his second wife Marianne. She accused him of beginning an affair with his current wife Callista while Marianne and he were still married (which Mr. Gingrich admits). She also accused him of lobbying her for an open marriage that would allow him to continue seeing Callista without getting divorced (a claim Gingrich denies).

Well, in any case, no open marriage was in the offing, and the Speaker married his current and third wife.

As I have written before for Fox News Opinion, I don’t think voters belong in a candidate’s bedroom. But the media can’t seem to help itself from trying to castrate candidates for the prurient pleasure of the public.

I will tell you what Mr. Gingrich’s personal history actually means for those of us who want to right the economy, see our neighbors and friends go back to work, promote freedom here and abroad and defeat the growing threat posed by Iran and other evil regimes.

First, one note on what Mr. Gingrich’s married life, including his history of infidelity does not mean: It does not mean that Mr. Gingrich would be unfaithful to the United States of America or the Constitution of the United States.

You can take any moral position you like about men and women who cheat while married, but there simply is no correlation, whatsoever—from a psychological perspective—between whether they can remain true to their wedding vows and whether they can remain true to the Oath of Office.

I want to be coldly analytical, not moralize, here. I want to tell you what Mr. Gingrich’s behavior could mean for the country, not for the future of his current marriage. So, here’s what one interested in making America stronger can reasonably conclude—psychologically—from Mr. Gingrich’s behavior during his three marriages:

1) Three women have met Mr. Gingrich and been so moved by his emotional energy and intellect that they decided they wanted to spend the rest of their lives with him.

2) Two of these women felt this way even though Mr. Gingrich was already married.

3 ) One of them felt this way even though Mr. Gingrich was already married for the second time, was not exactly her equal in the looks department and had a wife (Marianne) who wanted to make his life without her as painful as possible.

Conclusion: When three women want to sign on for life with a man who is now running for president, I worry more about whether we’ll be clamoring for a third Gingrich term, not whether we’ll want to let him go after one.

4) Two women—Mr. Gingrich’s first two wives—have sat down with him while he delivered to them incredibly painful truths: that he no longer loved them as he did before, that he had fallen in love with other women and that he needed to follow his heart, despite the great price he would pay financially and the risk he would be taking with his reputation.

Conclusion: I can only hope Mr. Gingrich will be as direct and unsparing with the Congress, the American people and our allies. If this nation must now move with conviction in the direction of its heart, Newt Gingrich is obviously no stranger to that journey.

5) Mr. Gingrich’s daughters from his first marriage are among his most vigorous supporters. They obviously adore him and respect him and feel grateful for the kind of father he was.

When I want to know who in a marriage (or, for that matter, a series of marriages) is the one who actually was aligned with their best interests, I never dismiss evidence of who the children gravitate toward and admire. In this case, they have judged the father who left their family, then remarried twice. And they judge him 10 out of 10. I only hope my own children love me and respect me as much when they are adults.

So, as far as I can tell, judging from the psychological data, we have only one real risk to America from his marital history if Newt Gingrich were to become president: We would need to worry that another nation, perhaps a little younger than ours, would be so taken by Mr. Gingrich that it would seduce him into marrying it and becoming its president. And I think that is exceedingly unlikely.

Dr. Keith Ablow is a psychiatrist and member of the Fox News Medical A-Team. Dr. Ablow can be reached at [email protected]. His team of Life Coaches can be reached at [email protected].

[Blarg]

republicans

[Sera]

lol fox news. i particularly enjoyed:

1) Three women have met Mr. Gingrich and been so moved by his emotional energy and intellect that they decided they wanted to spend the rest of their lives with him.

2) Two of these women felt this way even though Mr. Gingrich was already married.

3 ) One of them felt this way even though Mr. Gingrich was already married for the second time, was not exactly her equal in the looks department and had a wife (Marianne) who wanted to make his life without her as painful as possible.

Conclusion: When three women want to sign on for life with a man who is now running for president, I worry more about whether we’ll be clamoring for a third Gingrich term, not whether we’ll want to let him go after one.

[Milkster]

The thing that the media will pinpoint on is how flawed he is as a candidate. One of his main running points is "family values". He cheated with his second wife on his first wife, and gave her a divorce on her death bed. How can he know what's good for a family if he can barely keep his dick in his pants. Wives 2 and 3 were groupies that, in the slang tense, were chose. Nothing more, nothing less. The easy correlation to make between him cheating on wives and moving on to bigger and better is which corporation will be fresher and often him more money to become their puppet.

[Milkster]

Weren't Republicans all over John Edwards when he cheated on his wife?

[Sera]

Apparently family values only matter when it's the woman who is the cheater.

[Blarg]

Hitler was such a good guy, sure he killed some people but just look at everyone who followed him. They wouldn't have done that unless he was pretty swell

[Sera]

Someone should parody this article as if it were written by fox news about a democrat. I wish I were adept at parody writing.

[Kuya]

am i supposed to comment on open relationships or fox news

[Shiroikage]

is a hick

[Kuya]

in the bathtub

[Blarg]

is a hick

this rumor is really getting around lately so I'm pretty sure it's true

[Sera]

am i supposed to comment on open relationships or fox news

the correlation the author made between having 3 divorces and being a good president

[Alleya]

Holy fucking shit that was amazing.

[Alleya]

Delivered

Former Kenyan National and Democratic presidential candidate Barrak Obama was justly attacked Thursday in an interview on ABC News by his second wife Marianne. She accused him of beginning an affair with his current wife Callista while Marianne and he were still married (which Mr. Obama admits). She also accused him of lobbying her for an open marriage that would allow him to continue seeing Michelle without getting divorced (a claim Obama has not yet admitted).

Well, in any case, no open marriage was in the offing, and the Socialist married his current and third wife.

As I have written before for Fox News Opinion, I don’t think voters belong in a candidate’s bedroom, unless their conduct is unseemly as the President's. But the media can’t seem to help itself from trying to sweep Obama's heinous transgressions under the rug, and so, as usual, Americans must seek out the truth from the only source brave enough to give it to them.

I will tell you what Mr. Obama’s personal history actually means for those of us who want to right the economy, see our neighbors and friends go back to work, promote freedom here and abroad and defeat the growing threat posed by Iran and other evil regimes.

First, one note on what Mr. Obama's married life, including his history of infidelity does not mean: It does not mean that Mr. Obama would be unfaithful to the United States of America or the Constitution of the United States. It means that he IS unfaithful to the United States of America. This great nation was founded on Christian values, which promote monogamy above all else, and offers strict punishments for men who give up their vows in the way Mr. Obama has repeatedly done. If he is willing to give up so easily on his wife, then, honestly, he's already given up on what America stands for.

You can take any moral position you like about men and women who cheat while married, but there simply is a powerful correlation, --from a psychological and religious perspective—between whether they can remain true to their wedding vows and whether they can remain true to the Oath of Office. This is hard science that cannot be disputed.

I want to be coldly analytical, not moralize, here, but Mr. Obama's disgusting perversions ignite my passionate dislike of him, just as it does in the hearts of all red-blooded americans outside the liberal coasts. I want to tell you what Mr. Obama's behavior could mean for the country, not for the future of his current marriage, which is just as doomed as the country if we do not put a stop to this Marxist lunatic. So, here’s what one interested in making America stronger can reasonably conclude—psychologically—from Mr. Obama's behavior during his three marriages:

1) Three women have met Mr. Obama and been so terrified by his emotional energy and elitist intellect that they decided they would do anything to avoid rousing his displeasure.

2) Two of these women were coaxed and threatened into this arrangement even though Mr. Obama was already married.

3 ) One of them felt this way even though Mr. Obama was already married for the second time, was not exactly her equal in the looks department and had a wife (Marianne) who wanted to take her own life rather than live in the apocalyptic Socialism her unwanted husband envisioned.

Conclusion: When three helpless women are coaxed by this silver-tongued devil into immoral and disgusting arrangements, that can only mean that Mr. Obama intends to do the same to america.

4) Two women—Mr. Obama’s first two wives—have sat down with him while he delivered to them incredibly painful truths: that he no longer loved them as he did before, and that he did not intend to release them from his grasp, reveling in the price his soul would pay in God's afterlife for this mockery of our most sacred institution.

Conclusion: I can only hope Mr. Obama will be as direct and unsparing with the Congress, the American people and our allies. If this nation can see the eldrich nightmare they have installed in our white house, perhaps we can motivate the people to rise up against him, despite his protection from the liberal media.

5) Mr. Obama’s daughters from his first marriage are among his most vigorous supporters. They obviously fear him and loathe him and feel molested for the kind of father he was.

When I want to know who in a marriage (or, for that matter, a series of marriages) is the one who actually was aligned with their worst interests, I never dismiss evidence of who the children gravitate away from and despise. In this case, they have judged the father who left their family, then remarried twice. And they judge him 10 out of 10, fearing the consequences if they don't. But we know the truth in their hearts. I only hope my own children love me and respect me much when they are adults, knowing that my generation, in its weakness, elected this tyrant.

So, as far as I can tell, judging from the psychological data that I have not gathered, we have only one real risk to America from his marital history if Barrak Obama were to become president: That we should destroy the country we so love utterly and completely, as the Liberals have planned for decades. Good night, and may god have mercy on your soul.

Dr. Keith Ablow is a psychiatrist and member of the Fox News Medical A-Team. Dr. Ablow can be reached at [email protected]. His team of Life Coaches can be reached at [email protected].

[quannum]

psychological data

lol

[quannum]

[Kuya]

the correlation the author made between having 3 divorces and being a good president

i don't get it though, is it like, i'm supposed to take that statement seriously and debate it or just join in on the bashing, oh i am horrible at this aren't i

why does he want to show his older brother or older relative psycho rap

[Kuya]

yo, i just listened to that shit and what the fuck was that

[quannum]

asian beaners rapping to stan.

also hilarious.