Do companies have to pay a fine every year or just once?
You already know where my vote is Ksandra.
Also... Your move O'Reilly:
http://mediamatters.org/mmtv/201203260005
just read some comments on fox news and yahoo saying the supreme court should be dissolved lol
And I'm not talking replaced....completely removed.
Since I'm canadian i didn't follow this stuff at all so here is the questions mostly a TL;DR stuff
1) For those who kinda follow both country what is the difference between USA and Canada Health care
Our health care is still for profit and we pay for it.
Come on FOX, this shits not even cool anymore:
http://sphotos.xx.fbcdn.net/hphotos-...40255121_n.jpg
Ratatapa: Canada's system is what a lot of us here want. Single Payer system. The current system is a halfstep which tries to make it good for patients and health insurance providers. We still have the for-profit middleman except we don't have to pay them as much now and can't get denied for already being sick.
I was not aware that pregnancy could legally be labled be a pre-existing condition. I was under the idea that it was against the law. I found this link on google: http://www.dol.gov/ebsa/faqs/faq_consumer_hipaa.html
Are there illnesses or injuries that cannot be subject to a preexisting condition exclusion?
Yes, as follows:
Pregnancy, even if the woman had no prior coverage before enrolling in her current employer's plan.
Conditions present in a newborn or a child under 18 who is adopted or placed for adoption (even if the adoption is not yet final), as long as the child is enrolled in health coverage within 30 days of birth, adoption, or placement for adoption. In addition, the child must not have a subsequent, significant break in coverage (defined as 63 days). For instance, a significant break might occur if a parent lost his job and health coverage for himself and his family shortly after a child’s birth. This break will be discussed below.
Genetic information. For example, if a woman is found to have a gene indicating she is at a higher risk for breast cancer, she cannot be denied coverage if there is no diagnosis of the disease.
not sure how I feel about everything else, but as someone HIV, FUCK YOU PRE-EXISTING CONDITION CLAUSES! FUCK YEA!
ahem. sorry. I got a little excited there.
you have to look carefully at what it says. "before enrolling in her current employer's plan" you cannot be denied coverage going from a group plan to group plan (and cannot have a gap in coverage for more than 60 days), but there is no law against insurance companies denying preggos individual coverage. Blue Cross rep actually laughed at me when I called asking for some.
You are correct. However, one of the president's promises to the people (just like "this isn't a tax") was that this law would not force you to change insurance if you were covered under your employer. It's true, unless your employer decides to scrap your benefits.
I don't care either way, but it may be an unintended consequence, and blah blah blah people will complain.