Why did the Rabbi put his mouth on the baby's penis?

***Blarg*** · 2012-03-04 20:35

Originally Posted by Sera

Not introducing an infection source in the first place is INFINITELY BETTER than introducing it and then trying to "take it back" or "clean it up afterwards." How is this NOT obvious?

Do you have a problem with the idea of them using a glass tube for suction to remove/separate mouth/penis contact by an inch or 2 if otherwise the procedure is exactly the same.

**Siatdiat** · 2012-03-04 20:35

Originally Posted by Ryko

Yeah I've heard as much before. It was just one of those "THE HORRID TRUTH" moments.

Its actually a really bad and irresponsible thing to not admit it when in a sexual relationship. There is a myth that people have accepted that type 1 can't be transmitted through oral sex, but it in fact can, just at a low rate.

**Ryko** · 2012-03-04 20:37

Yeah that happened to a friend of mine, just ruined her for every other cat.

**Siatdiat** · 2012-03-04 20:38

Originally Posted by Ryko

Why are we ignoring the 100% statistic that he had herpes and that's fatal to a child? <_<

Or also the fact that at best, 1 out of every 2 people has herpes.

**hey** · 2012-03-04 20:39

Originally Posted by Ksandra

I agree this wouldn't be a perfect statistic, but still one nonetheless.

Fake data is worse than no data.

**Sera** · 2012-03-04 20:41

Originally Posted by Blarg

Do you have a problem with the idea of them using a glass tube for suction to remove/separate mouth/penis contact by an inch or 2 if otherwise the procedure is exactly the same.

DERP you can sanitize the glass, can't sanitize your mouth. are you fucking with me right now?

**Ryko** · 2012-03-04 20:42

Condoms dont break, guys. Forget the neosporin lube, that shit's expensive.

**Sera** · 2012-03-04 20:44

if you put your mouth on something, it is no longer sterile or sanitary.

**Ksandra** · 2012-03-04 20:45

Originally Posted by hey

Fake data is worse than no data.

that wouldn't be fake, it would give an idea how often rabbis without known diseases are giving kids infections. It would at least give us a basis of what actually has been happening with those that take precaution.

**Churchill** · 2012-03-04 20:46

Ksandra would you be okay if this practice was performed in front of other children in public, or if I slaughtered a goat in my front yard for your children to see?

Blood sacrifice predates any Judaism garbage, and I need to make an offering to my rape god.

**BaneTheBrawler** · 2012-03-04 20:46

GOATS FOR THE GOAT GOD

**Churchill** · 2012-03-04 20:46

A good solution is for people not to put their mouths on childrens dicks

**Greatguardian** · 2012-03-04 20:48

Wait, was the question about consent for ear piercings? I'd have thought there would be a difference between medical procedures and cosmetics. Maybe I'm off somewhere.

**Rhyis.** · 2012-03-04 20:50

Why did that baby put his penis in that rabbi's mouth? Poor guy. Being sexually assaulted by a baby.

**Ksandra** · 2012-03-04 20:51

Originally Posted by Greatguardian

Wait, was the question about consent for ear piercings? I'd have thought there would be a difference between medical procedures and cosmetics. Maybe I'm off somewhere.

YOUR LATE. No, I meant that you made a vague comment about children must be always considered unconsenting or something to that effect (too lazy to go back and get the exact wording). I was trying to get clarification on what you meant by that. ie. just babies, just circumcisions, anything, etc.

Basically I was trying to get you to put more context to your statement.

**Sera** · 2012-03-04 20:53

Originally Posted by Churchill

A good solution is for people not to put their mouths on childrens dicks

i think this is the first and probably last time we will agree on something

**hey** · 2012-03-04 20:53

Originally Posted by Ksandra

that wouldn't be fake, it would give an idea how often rabbis without known diseases are giving kids infections. It would at least give us a basis of what actually has been happening with those that take precaution.

Sorry, poor word choice on my part. I should have said bullshit data, which is also worse than no data. That's like going to a church, and asking everyone if they support abortion, and then declaring that no one at all supports abortion. it means nothing, and the only purpose of such data would be to deceive people.

***Blarg*** · 2012-03-04 20:53

Originally Posted by Sera

DERP you can sanitize the glass, can't sanitize your mouth. are you fucking with me right now?

well you did have a problem with the creepiness of it so I wondered how much that would still matter to you

**Lucavi** · 2012-03-04 20:53

Originally Posted by Rhyis.

Why did that baby put his penis in that rabbi's mouth? Poor guy. Being sexually assaulted by a baby.

Shouldn't have been a rabbi in a war zone?

**Qalbert** · 2012-03-04 20:54

why is everyone hating on saliva? always was pretty good

Thread: Why did the Rabbi put his mouth on the baby's penis?

Thread Tools

Latest Threads

Up & Coming Threads

Hottest Threads