I think he honestly had no idea what a dispatcher does, simple as that. He may have thought that a dispatcher is someone who sits in a guard shack within the community or something.
I think he honestly had no idea what a dispatcher does, simple as that. He may have thought that a dispatcher is someone who sits in a guard shack within the community or something.
no wonder they're using pictures of him as a kid
http://i43.tinypic.com/2m35lqo.jpg
Flip off web cam, what a thug.
Just look at those fingers...they're black! I bet he's violent.
The word of the dispacther is still a lawful order, and one designed to try to keep individuals safe. Some dispatchers are civilian personal, but are sworn personal simply for this reason.
Its up to the town laws to really decide if refusing a order from a dispatcher, or call taker is a illegal offense. There are no current federal laws containing any wording into that..... and honestly with this case, and the one in Texas a few years back (guy killed 2 individuals breaking into neighbors home) I could see states starting to pass laws about not accepting orders from a dispatcher.
*edit*
Or maybe my department is just special when it comes to sworn personal..... I believe the dispatchers here are the only ones in the country that can make huge decisions like calling off chases, or tactical response to active shooter situations.
http://www.myfoxtampabay.com/dpp/new...erman-03232012
This may help explain why he was not arrested that night.
notthisshitagain.jpg
Lol
Sorry, only came across that today.
So like, if he was beaten like this guy says, and the police let him off because he was bloodied. Why didn't they say that was the reason they didn't charge them? And if they did, then why are they being criticized so heavily?
I can tell you right now, that if pictures were released of this fat mexican all bloodied and battered, then there wouldn't be such a big deal being made out of a shitty investigation. That said, did he even go to the hospital for his wounds?
The article was posted yesterday, why didn't the witness come forward earlier? What's the background on this invisible witness only wanting to be identified by his first name?
Why would the rage be pointless. Some vigilante civilian decided to follow around someone guilty of walking while black and approach him despite being told to stand down.
No, it's fucking irrelevant. If he was a construction worker, football player, soccer player, it's irrelevant. There's no reason the physical description (which someone already posted he was 6'1 150 or something) should matter if the guy was instigating an attack. It's not like this is a little kid beating up a 250 lb adult vs a grown man beating up a 250 lb adult for no reason. The adult instigated the attack in the first place and who the victim was or what the victim was capable of should have no effect on the stand your ground law.
Aggravated walking while black.