You guys are making this way too complicated. If Treyvon was beating his head into the ground he is entitled to the common law version of the right to self defense. Florida's stand your ground law is irrelevant. It also won't matter that Zimmerman approached first if it's true that he disengaged.
And, even if Florida is a duty to retreat state, I don't know how it's even possible to retreat while your head is being bashed into the ground.
Lol'd @ littering, Grade A trolling or these people are fucking douchebags.
i'm no lawyer, but probably depends on if the advice was good and if it was random act of god. If your calling about gun shots and the person tells you to look out the window to verify how many people with guns are out there and you get your head blown off then yea you may have a wrongful death suit on your hands. If your outside and you report a robbery and they tell you to stand still and don't follow and you listen and a piano falls on your head or the person randomly fires and you get hit by a ricochet, then you pretty much got an act of god kind of death and nothing would happen to the dispatcher.
But that didn't happen, so it's irrelevant.
not this shit again...You guys are making this way too complicated. If Treyvon was beating his head into the ground he is entitled to the common law version of the right to self defense. Florida's stand your ground law is irrelevant. It also won't matter that Zimmerman approached first if it's true that he disengaged.
And, even if Florida is a duty to retreat state, I don't know how it's even possible to retreat while your head is being bashed into the ground.
You are completely missing the point that was made many many pages ago in this thread is that the whole situation is so ambiguous and having no witnesses it could equally be argued that Treyvon was invoking his right to self defense when he was bashing his head into the ground. Prove to me that bashing Zimmermans head into the ground wasn't part of Treyvon defending himself.
You can't.
In this case here, since it's a murder charge, the burden of proof is on the state to prove that Zimmerman did not act in self defense. If they can't prove within a reasonable doubt that zimmerman was never in danger and therefore had no need to use his gun on Trayvon, then he will walk. The joy of innocent till proven guilty which a lot of people, zimmerman included seem to forget now a days.
I wonder, then, would lack of injury be enough to do away with the whole self defense plea, given that Trayvon held no weapons other than his fists?
Also, can a suspect's changing of story be brought up in a professional manner in a courtroom?
"Look, this guy went from xx defense to this other one, he's just trying to do anything that will work"
yes
Only if he gave conflicting reports to law enforcement personnel after he's been advised of his rights. If the defense sticks to the story Zimmerman gave on his sworn statement then the prosecutor can try to bring it up, but any defense worth their salt will object because the argument would essentially boil down to he said/she said in an attempt to influence the panel/jury.
One way or the other Zimmerman will end up hurt or dead. If he gets acquitted sooner or later someone will find him. If he gets convicted he's probably going to need to be kept in the special wing of whatever pen he would go to. If they toss him in genpop he's dead. He's going to be living the rest of his life in fear of reprisal. He's never going to know peace again. This amuses me.
http://gothamist.com/2012/04/14/tray...e_wasnt_co.php
Interview with trayvon's big brother