Here BG hate on this.
Here BG hate on this.
Now there's the good shit.
The only half intelligent tweet out of all of those is Eminem's, goddamn celebrities are stupid.
Edit : 35 minutes? yeah no
let's also just ignore this bumbling fuck's awful reenactment video with him getting told repeatedly that he can't lie worth a shit.
tl;dw version: Everything Zimmerman said was true, and poor little saintly George was the real victim, and drug-slinging/using, fight-picking, MMA-trained Trayvon caused his own death.
Edit: Last ten minutes seems to be devoted to showing why it's perfectly reasonable to profile all the blax.
Edit edit: It's the Black Matriarchy's fault.
Triple edit: There are some real gems in that video. His preferred name for Ol' Prezzy is "B. Hussein Obama".
I wonder if Zimmerman is gonna write a book titled "If i had killed Martin because i hated black people, this is how i would have done it". I'd fund it.
Originally Posted by Plow
Originally Posted by Drex
No, I don't. I said it's not "quite clear that Zimmerman's story was complete bullshit full of lies and exaggerations." I don't believe there is evidence to conclude beyond reasonable doubt that Zimmerman's version of events is inaccurate. I believe the prosecution spectacularly failed to prove beyond reasonable doubt that he was not acting in self-defense, therefore I believe he should be innocent of all charges.Originally Posted by Plow
It doesn't take a 36 on the ACTs to understand this verdict, and you don't have to be racist to be happy about Zim getting off.
I keep seeing things like "When Zimmerman got out of the care he started the aggression" and "Zimmerman ran him down then gunned him down" and "Zimmerman ignored the 911 operator and got out."
But how can that be? Exactly? Forget about the reenactment and listen and breakdown the non-emergency phone call.
Zimmerman's non-emergency phone call:
at 2:08 into the call he (Zimmerman) says "fuck"(under his breath) "He's running"
2:10 you hear what sounds like him exiting the vehicle.
2:12 (dispatcher) which way is he Running
then at 2:19-20 Zimmerman sounds like he is breathing heavily (running)
at 2:24-25 (dispatcher) are you following him?
2:25-26 (Zimmerman) Yeah
2:28 (dispatcher) ok, you don't need you to do that.
2:29 (Zimmerman) Ok
2:34-35 Zimmerman's breathing is back to normal and he starts answering questions, his breathing continues to go back to normal. He answers questions until the call ends at 4:05. Obviously walking. So he ran after Martin for up to 14 seconds of the call.
So Martin took off running at 2:08 roughly, at 2:12 it sounds like Zimmerman got out of the car. It wasn't until 2:24-25 that the dispatcher asked if he(Zimmerman) was following the him(Martin). So prior to that question the dispatcher never said "don't get out of your car." And in fact asked Zimmerman which way he(Martin) went. Zimmerman's breathing is back to near normal by 2:34-35 so he ignored the dispatcher for less than 10 seconds. By that 2:34-35 point Zimmerman has lost sight of Martin, so he spent 1 minute 30 seconds longer on the phone during which time Zimmerman has no idea of where Martin is.
Now the average person walks 3 miles per hour and in 2 minutes of walking you will go approximately 475 feet. Jog at 6 miles per hour for 2 minutes 950 feet and run 9 miles per hour and go 1425 feet(nearly the length of 5 football fields).
So Martin started running approximately 2 minutes and 8 seconds into the phone call and when the phone call ended at 4 minutes and 5 seconds Martin could have been anywhere from 475 feet and all the way up to 1425 feet from where he started. How did Zimmerman run him down? How did he even catch up to him if Zimmerman himself didn't even run for more than 20 seconds at the maximum during the phone call and more likely about 10-12 seconds.
You can only come to two conclusions:
1. Martin ran a short distance and hid.
2. Martin ran in a large circle and got in between Zimmerman and his vehicle.
So Zimmerman didn't ignore the dispatcher and get out of his car, he did that 12 seconds before he was told not to. Zimmerman did not run Martin down on foot because he had one and a half to two minutes of conversation with the dispatcher after he lost sight of Martin, and had no clue where Martin was.
Now if you conclude 1 then how did the physical altercation take place?
a. Martin watched from his hiding place and initiated the confrontation after the phone call concluded.
b. after the phone call concluded Zimmerman searched and found Martin.
If you conclude 2, then Martin circled back, why? He could have been long gone. Martin wanted a confrontation.
I did my share of mischief as a teenager and did plenty of running and hiding for adults and other teenagers at night, and getting away in the dark is easy.
Seeing how the big response was clearly and directly to the people saying she didn't want the trial to fail, and you're not one of the people that said she didn't want the trial to fail...
I'm going to go out on a limb and guess that if what I said wasn't related to what you said it's probably because it wasn't a reply to what you said.
I didn't say it was proven beyond a reasonable doubt that he was guilty, I said it was clear that his actual story was complete bullshit.
Speaking of reading comprehension...
Sure, if you completely ignore the fact that he's clearly simply lost sight of the kid and is stalking around to find him, to the extent that he couldn't agree to meet the cop somewhere but had to have him call because he knew he was going to be off looking to find the kid and didn't know where he'd find him, you can convince yourself a dude that lied at every possible opportunity is telling an accurate story about how he wasn't chasing the kid np. Who cares if he made it exceedingly clear that he had every intention of finding and catching the kid and then did.
Jurors disagreed
rural jurors
5 white women disagreed yeah
always keepin the black man down
Celebrity tweets = thread over. Meanwhile a bunch of black people that we don't know are getting killed and guess what no one cares.
Guilt wasn't proven beyond a reasonable doubt so that makes the jury racist?
L
O
L