http://www.mprnews.org/story/2016/07...us-interaction
The officer who killed Philando Castile had interacted with him once before in 2011 in a traffic stop for a broken taillight.
http://www.mprnews.org/story/2016/07...us-interaction
The officer who killed Philando Castile had interacted with him once before in 2011 in a traffic stop for a broken taillight.
Sky News Newsdesk @SkyNewsBreak
Update - #Munich Police says it believes more than one gunman is involved in the shopping centre shooting and no one has been arrested yet
Bah
http://okcfox.com/news/fox-25-invest...birthday-party
In super sad news...
The germany stuff belongs in the not-true-muslim-yet-Islam-inspired megathread
ATF has been shooting dogs for over a decade now. Where have you been?
and they literally use "ITS COMING RIGHT AT ME" as a defense
motherfucker if a little puppy running at you happily causes you to fear for your life, GET OUT OF MY POLICE FORCE
I don't think you can fear for your life that much if he walked away from the dog went back to his car, got a rifle, and shot the dog with a rifle. Or was he really walking around with a rifle rather than his sidearm?
JMC how often do cops do that when serving a warrant?
Sounds like he went and got it.The police officer used a high-powered rifle he retrieved from his police vehicle to put the dog down.
I would disagree that 5.56 is a "high-powered" rifle. But dollars to donuts says it WAS an assault weapon because cops are allowed giggle switches.
So basically, "vicious" dog was in the yard, and the cop felt he had the right to go all over the yard in execution of the warrant, so he executed the dog to protect himself from the dog in the yard, even though the first step should've been knocking on the front fucking door. Or maybe I'm just presuming that this house was organized the way literally every house I've ever seen is, where the fenced in yard is in the back of the house and the front door is freely accessible.
Don't forget the fact that he saw the dog. Went back to his vehicle. Got out the rifle specifically. Then went back and shot the dog. He didn't just shoot the dog when he felt threatened with whatever weapon he already had on him.
Either dog wasn't aggressive or the dog was contained enough that he could take the time to go get his rifle.
Right, I was leaving open the possibility that the house is somehow fully fenced in and the dog was inside the fence. More specifically, in order to execute the warrant (by going to the door), he had to get past the dog, and the most expedient method was by killing it, which he justified by having a warrant. That seems extraordinarily unlikely, but it's not impossible. It's also immensely fucked up, but somehow I think the law would be on his side if that was actually the case.
Did they specify the type of warrant it was? There are warrants that are referred to as no knock where you essentially bust right in. Very rarely used, and is already a source of controversy after someone done fucked up, put the wrong address on the warrant and a grannie got shot.
So back to what I said, this guy purposefully HUNTED the dog...
I'm sorry this shit needs a revamp. People are going to hunt cops until they're accountable for what they do. If the blue line is so fucking important to you, well sorry, fuck you, you're not above the law. Cops have been murdering, stealing, harassing people within our borders for too fucking long. SOMEONE needs to stop this shit. /sorryreallyfuckingpissed
its funny im pretty sure if they had numbers on how many dogs killed with videos like they do for people cops would be hunted down and held accountable by animal rights alone