"He didn’t have to put his hands on him,” Craig says.
“Why not?” the officer asks.
What?
I mean. I can't even. I have no words for that exchange.
"He didn’t have to put his hands on him,” Craig says.
“Why not?” the officer asks.
What?
I mean. I can't even. I have no words for that exchange.
what a shit headed officer
Shouldn't have littered in a war zone.
Not really the right thread for this but not worth a new one, but WTF lol:
http://twitchy.com/brettt-3136/2016/...f-shots-fired/
Like 10 malls across the US yesterday had hoax gunfire and stampedes and shit. I was reading this last night and it just kept going and going. Really curious where this idea originated.
Barking is grounds for shooting? Chasing it down into the basement is grounds for shooting it? What the fuck?
"The dog ran away from me my life was in danger"
Haven't read the article, but based on that reaction I'm guessing the dog was a black lab?
I'm gunna call BS on this one. Lol yahoo celebrity news section with a link to a site that looks all kinds of fishy and snopes calling it BS.
snopes not exactly calling it bullshit.
Well they are saying the incident did occur but not as reported especially the details or lack thereof that make kind of completely change the whole situation as well as the clickbait headlines being false.
Article is trying suggest that this ruling somehow authorizes police to kill any dog that barks or moves completely false. And was trying to make it sound like the dogs did nothing and there was no threat at all and that the court is blatantly allowing that while the snopes report has the court actually ruling on the dogs posing an imminent danger that prevented them from searching. The excerpted quotes of the officers do sound a little fishy imo but that's a different conversation
The court said the owners couldn't provide proof that the dogs didn't move towards officers or bark. If you don't think that sets a dangerous precedent about pets in areas being served a search warrent, idk what to tell ya.
Sounds about the same as any other case involving differing reports from officers and civilians without proof... only we usually hear about it with people getting shot.
#Wisconsin (The Florida of the Midwest)http://www.twincities.com/2017/01/11...a-report-says/A St. Croix County, Wis., sheriff’s deputy likely consumed at least 15 shots of vodka before getting behind the wheel of his squad, where he was found passed out with the vehicle’s transmission in drive and his foot on the brake.
DoJ says Chicago Police routinely trample on civil rights:
https://www.nytimes.com/2017/01/13/u...imes&smtyp=cur
full report link : http://www.chicagotribune.com/news/c...htmlstory.htmlThe Chicago police have systemically violated the civil rights of residents by routinely using excessive force, a practice that particularly affects African-Americans and Latinos, the Justice Department said in a scathing report released on Friday, unveiling the findings of a 13-month investigation into the city’s police department.
I, for one, am shocked!
http://taskandpurpose.com/marine-vet..._medium=social
Military vet turned cop tries to talk down a man with a gun, back up arrives and fatally shoots the man. The gun ended up having no mag in it, and the vet gets fired for endangering the lives of his backup.
Wasn't there a similar story a while back or is it the same one? Cop did the same thing where he tried to talk the guy down instead of killing him and backup came and shot the guy. The argument boiled down to that just the threat of something going awry was enough to kill the suspect and keep the police out of harm's way.
And here I thought we were paying them to risk their lives for us.