Ridiculous Police News (Specific events)

[Ksandra]

As an owner of rottweiler he wasn't trying to attack. He was just trying to get between the cops and his master.


You'll know when a rottweiler wants to attack. The fucking cop panicked and shot the dog.

This is more of an indictment of lack of training on the cops part than anything else.

Not even just a rottweiler. Any dog that's up for an attack is gonna do it from the start. From the very beginning of the exchange, you can see the dog backing away from the cops, keeping low, and trying to move around them to get to his owner. That's extremely typical defensive behavior. He just wanted to get to his owner.

[edit] You can tell even from the beginning of the video that that's an extremely well-behaved/trained dog.

[Quazimoto]

Calling in the BEAHCAT, maybe Jmc could help on this point of view

[hey]

As an owner of rottweiler he wasn't trying to attack. He was just trying to get between the cops and his master.


You'll know when a rottweiler wants to attack. The fucking cop panicked and shot the dog.

This is more of an indictment of lack of training on the cops part than anything else.

Fair enough.

You are terrible at life.

Because i've never seen a dog attack someone?

[Ksandra]

Because i've never seen a dog attack someone?

That's not what you said, but ok.

[hey]

I don't think a youtube video from 30 feet away taken with a crappy phone camera really counts, but ok.

[Quazimoto]

lets assume the officer does not have a dog like a rottwieler, or staffordshire ,pitbull , mastiff...the dog got loose so if anything blame the idiot for bringing his dog to a war zone

[Ksandra]

I don't think a youtube video from 30 feet away taken with a crappy phone camera really counts, but ok.

http://media.tumblr.com/tumblr_lvv4jvx4xj1qemoij.png

Let's try this:

I asked if you've ever seen a dog attack.

You didn't say no or not on this one. You said not on youtube. Which means you've seen them outside of youtube. Which implied you think you know more about dog attacks because you've seen them outside of youtube.

And yet, then responded saying you never saw a dog attack someone.


So either you've seen one before or not. Pick one.

[jmc]

Calling in the BEAHCAT, maybe Jmc could help on this point of view

Nope, don't even want to watch the clip.

Dog lover that owns 3 dogs (german shepherd, jack russell terrier and a border collie)

So yea, not even going to watch that clip.

[hey]

Ksandra, reread my post.

[Sho]

Oh man, I hope the guy gets a fat check in the mail. What a way for a dog to go.

[Ksandra]

Ksandra, reread my post.

Have you never seen a dog attack before?

Not off of youtube.

Because i've never seen a dog attack someone?

pick one

[Quazimoto]

Nope, don't even want to watch the clip.

Dog lover that owns 3 dogs (german shepherd, jack russell terrier and a border collie)

So yea, not even going to watch that clip.

like i said , lets assume the officer does not have a dog like a rottwieler, or staffordshire ,pitbull , mastiff...unsure of a certain dogs behavior, more than likely this incident would happen, correct?

[hey]

pick one

Not off of youtube.

That one.

[Ksandra]

like i said , lets assume the officer does not have a dog like a rottwieler, or staffordshire ,pitbull , mastiff...unsure of a certain dogs behavior, more than likely this incident would happen, correct?

He's not going to watch the video he said. How can he answer this question?

[Cheerios]

Better audio between the officers and the man being detained. The title is sure to rustle some jimmies.

[Ksandra]

That one.

great, so you've seen them, and should know better. I stand by my statement:

You are terrible at life.

[hey]

I think you're still misreading.

Not off (note this is not "on") of youtube, as in i have seen them only on youtube, and nowhere else.

[Cheerios]

I think you're still misreading.

Not off (not this is not "on") of youtube, as in i have seen them only on youtube, and nowhere else.

Probably would've been better off using "outside" instead of "off", but it was understandable the first time.

[Quazimoto]

He's not going to watch the video he said. How can he answer this question?

by reading the above posts..in which he decided NOT to watch the horrible scene?
i have owned staffordshires and pitbulls...but i know how protective they are, but many officers have not met these breeds in a positive manner and for Jmc to avoid the question is odd

[Ksandra]

I think you're still misreading.

Not off (note this is not "on") of youtube, as in i have seen them only on youtube, and nowhere else.

great, so you've seen them, and should know better. I stand by my statement:

You are terrible at life.

I dunno how this is hard for you. If you've seen them on youtube you should know that wasn't a dog attack. I dunno how many times I have to say that for you to get it.