Winning game 1 was meaningless guys. The Thunder would much rather have lost it and be headed to LA with the series tied 1-1.
Winning game 1 was meaningless guys. The Thunder would much rather have lost it and be headed to LA with the series tied 1-1.
Not sure it got reported, but halfway through the third Westbrook and Serge got into it on the sideline. Feel free to speculate about how they can't work together.
westbrook prob told him to stop taking open shots and that if anyone was going to brick the thunder to a loss it would be him.
majerle is such a boss
I LOL'd at harden elbowing metta last night.
Salt on deck
Game 1 of any series is meaningless Yes. Considering LA could've/should've won yesterday and that game one victory by the thunder null.
Can't believe it's that hard for you to grasp. Granted both you and Leroy are retarded as fuck but this is reaching Leonardo dicaprio in Gilbert grape retardedness.
Btw can't believe d wade didn't get suspended for that bitch move while a Scrub gets chastise and suspended multiple games for doing the Same thing to Blake griffin.
CAN ANY1 POST VIC OF DWADE WANG FOUL PLZ
If anything Yesterday's game made game 1 meaningful. Don't be stupid.
Its still 1/4 of the games needed to win. I always hated when people say a game doesnt matter (outside of preseason). It may be because my team has missed the playoffs quite a bit lately by 1 or 2 games but wins in Nov count the same as wins in April.
Do I have to break it down for you?
Forget that the Lakers are 1/7 in series where they start 0-2. Also that teams that start 2-0 win 93% of the time.
EDIT: inb4:
Spoiler: show
It's 95%
...but they didn't win last night, making game 1 meaningful.
And if they had lost, they won the first game so they are not in a 0-2, making the first game meaningful.
What's the different between a win followed by a loss and a loss followed by a win? You seem to think the latter is somehow preferable.
I just fucking said that. Try to keep up.