I thought they only locked it for shite posters and getouts
I thought they only locked it for shite posters and getouts
I mean, like a fellow poster or not, once you have a certain amount of cred[?] it seems odd to lock those people's threads
nah, add butthurt to that list
lin, the faithful cheerleader
it's all opinion bro. plus it was one thread, she didn't need to cry to the mods over it, that's some old lame shit.
gonna stop before I'm accused of white knighting but that's my 2 cents on locking established members' threads
fuck lin just shut up
I'm late to the party as usual, despite checking bg for 8 hours every weekday at work, but I will say that the google4u thread seems a fun enough thread even if its point was made with raggy a day or 2 ago. Whatever it has to do with day (if at all) seems secondary to me and if the thread had been left alone, I don't see that it would have become a second bandstand for the same sermon
i think that everything is fair game as long as it entertains me
entertain us doesn't work when written :\
You are supposed to lock threads to get the upper hand, that is what a spam mod should do
they earned the right to
yeah i think you're going a little overboard with this "fairness" and "credibility", I barely mod anything, so I think it's loltastic it rustled someone into PMing a mod
qal locks the best, I kinda think locking when you're personally involved on any level is a shade of grey too close to power tripping (and I would say this about any mod, nothing that's happening changes how I see day or sera)
but in any case, qal's locks and edits are funny, they're a pretty good spot to take pointers from. Blarg is sorta getting the hang of it but I don't always get it
I mean really how long was that thread going to last? It isn't a catastrophe that it got locked
LOL at the day I take instructions from titanss. Hahahahaha.