Better not have tourettes in that town... lol
Better not have tourettes in that town... lol
be well, Massachusetts
This.
I'm not the type to drop a cuss word in every sentence, but I don't censor myself either. I honestly don't see the point. Again, the words don't hurt anyone. If you have stabbing jolts of pain if/when I say "fuck," then you might want to go get your head checked.
Or you could ignore it, which is what I'd suggest people start doing. You're honestly going to use police man-hours to fine people who are using foul language, instead of chasing after the people who are robbing convenience stores, raping women, killing people, driving under the influence, and any number of worse offenses? Do they think swearing is a gateway to crime? Do they think it's going to cultivate a society of respect for the police? Do they think that if Joe Schmoe gets a fine for swearing that it's automatically going to stop him from robbing your local Blockbuster? What do they seriously hope to achieve here?
If they're going to hire more people just for this swearing thing, I have to question the use of taxpayer money here. If there's a lot of crime elsewhere for which an increase in police force would be justified, why would they hire the police force to enforce a swearing ban over hiring the police force to work on stopping the other criminal offenses?
The whole thing is incredibly stupid to me.
Hence why I was on the fence. The law seems to fine those that are using profanity loudly in public, but does not care about private conversational swearing. I'm arguing that we don't need to use profanity to express ourselves in public, but I'm not arguing against small private/casual profanity which I think most people here are accustomed to (and seem to think that I am against).
However, if this law is trying to curb teenage profanity, then they are going about it the wrong way (I suppose that's what the lawmakers were trying to do based on the article?)
I can't drive around Mass without hearing at least 1 f-bomb a day. Tbh, middleboro is slightly east of the worst parts of math, but I highly doubt this will last long. Too many aholes up here to write that many citations.
Is it bigoted? You would weigh someone that uses profane language as their primary means of expression the same as someone that avoids it for a vocabulary that is considered decent in the public's eye?
Abridging speech is never OK, or reasonable. Perhaps you're aware of the first amendment? If someone is being truly disruptive, there's already something for that: disturbing the peace/disorderly conduct/etc. Creating laws that specifically target speech that's deemed "profane" (by who, exactly?) is, not to put too fine a point on it, anti-american.
Is this the part where we start implanting v-chips into kids so they get shocked when they curse and it'll ultimately save us from Satan and Saddam Hussein taking over the world?
I stand by what i said.
George is rolling over in his grave.