So in a nutshell
We shouldn't talk about hope solo because of the patriarchy cisgender privilege buzzword buzzword sexism misogynist.
Clicked on the authors page, out of curiosity.
http://doylejennifer.kinja.com/
Something I don't think that was ever brought up in this thread, that I admittedly never thought about.
Mommy boards talk about feminism a lot, and I found some women I would think would be hard core feminists aren't. Why? Because they are African American. They take the persepctive that feminism is white women fighting for white male privilege.
Here is an example that shows where they get this idea:
http://thecoloredfountain.net/2013/1...n-review-2013/
Interesting essay about it:
http://www.academia.edu/223818/Being...Women_of_Color
you don't have time to complain about video games when you play life on the hardest setting.
To be fair, no one is pretending to care about the sport.
They're pretending to care whether she's suspended in the sport, so yeah they are.
This is actually a very interesting aspect of intersectionality, and one that a proper safe feminist space attempts to address.
The fact is that black feminists are correct in criticizing many aspects of "typical" white feminist spaces, which highlight the plights of middle class white women. The same criticism is applicable to spaces that don't address plights of minorities, trans indivduals, etc. One example of these is criticism towards "Slutwalk" and how it highlights a heteronormative, cis version of feminism mostly associated with white women (i.e. a Muslim feminist woman may not identify with the message of Slutwalk).
You just technically defeated your own argument. Those two are not the same thing. :^)
Wanting her to lose her job (basically) doesn't mean you care what her job is or care anything about that job. Its the same thing as dudes getting fired in donglegate and any number of other things when the masses call for someone to lose their job over something totally unrelated to it. (Same as Ray Rice and others in the NFL as well.)
Nah.
Professional athletes are amazing at playing their game, but that's just to serve the larger, moneymaking purpose of their being public figures. What matters is not the specific sport she plays, it's that she's an athlete in some capacity with all the merchandise and endorsement deals that entails. I can say a soccer player shouldn't be allowed to get away with domestic violence and keep her job without caring about soccer. I can count the number of NFL games I've ever watched on one hand, I still didn't think Ben Roethlisberger should be able to rape a girl, Ray Lewis to stab a guy, and Michael Vick to run a dogfighting ring and still have jobs selling jerseys and tickets and being heroes to kids.
Maz normally says some dumb shit, but I don't get whats wrong with that.
I wasn't talking about holding hands there, chief. But let's go with that.
I've read it a few times now, there's nothing wrong with Maz's post, and it doesn't sink anywhere near the level of the worst that's made this thread in the last three weeks. You singling out that post makes zero sense. Let's go with nothing.