Your victim card is worn out ever try something new ?
Your victim card is worn out ever try something new ?
Okay, that ran its course, back into the usual Hey-and-Archi vs. Everyone Else rut. Unless you have something new or interesting to share, please don't post. I don't like locking threads.
THATS MY POINT
They dont promote discussion, they just speak their shit, and when anyone tries to discuss anything:
And the few times they do want to discuss something, they resort to strawman bullshit, as called out by literally "everyone else" for the past 3 pages.
That was not new or interesting. Disappointing, though.
Okay. Now that we've had some time to cool down, I'm re-opening this thread. I do not want to see personal attacks, and while it is interesting to see Hey's opinion, I don't want another twenty pages of her defending it. It is extremely unlikely that you are ever going to change her mind, so once you guys find yourselves repeating things or covering topics you've discussed before recently, please just stop. The emphasis should be on new and interesting topics related to feminism. This goes for everyone.
newest factual feminist. I would post the older ones but we've talked about the subjects already(for the most part) and I don't want hey to have an aneurysm
Really?It is extremely unlikely that you are ever going to change her mind
I change my mind about things based on discussion here all the time.
Waste of time, the biggest problem, which is talked about at 4:15 briefly, isn't addressed except to say "there's no data".
Yes, but generally not about the things that take up 20 pages. That's why they end up taking 20 pages. Those are the opinions to which I was referring. I am asking people to stop trying after, say, 3 pages.
Believe it or not, I generally try not to contradict myself in the same post, let alone sentence.
So we should argue for a maximum of three pages and then just ignore Hey? Just trying to clarify what should happen after those three pages.
We're talking about 3 pages at 50 ppp too, right?
Fk, and here I've been putting up with 20 ppp.
Kaley Cuoco does not consider herself a modern generation feminist (keyword being modern generation, since she's aware of the things feminists has to do way back when) because she's never had to deal with inequality.
http://www.theblaze.com/stories/2014...ith-feminists/
Feminists response: "she's a talentless idiot"
http://gawker.com/kaley-cuoco-im-not...ike-1676352429
aka: you're either with us, or you're against us and support the patriarchy.
As you wish.
>irrelevant hot chick says something
>irrelevant other people comment on it
>I only care since she's hot
yea you hit the gold mine here. Can't wait for the real hard hitting discussion to be had from this important news. I don't even see where in the article it says she's a talentless idiot, but whatever. We've established you only read like 25% of sentences anyway.
Uh, read the comments?
The feminists response was from the comments
"Kaley Cuoco: Duh, I'm an Idiot! I have no idea what the word "feminist" actually means, and I'm trying desperately to be popular with the greatest number of people I can grab. Don't ask me, I'm just a girl. He he!"
"Luckiest gal in show biz. No talent and is now making 1 mill per episode. Gives me an instant rage headache."
"She's an unfunny actress in an unfunny show, yet rich beyond imagination. Lucky indeed."
but good job reading past 25% of the page homie. Its good you call the people commenting "irrelevant people", since those are all the feminists I'm referring to, so you're basically calling feminists irrelevant. You do the patriarchy proud![]()