NFL fantasy football 2012-2013.

[Xajii]

skirkle pls

[Gadritan]

SENT YOU SOMETHING FULL OF CALORIES

You don't have a single WR I would consider for even Ridley, much less AD. Stop sending me garbage.

[Tyr]

You don't have a single WR I would consider for even Ridley, much less AD. Stop sending me garbage.

Why was our Reggie Wayne for Adrian Peterson trade rejected? That trade is fair and helps both teams...

I hate it when owners get all jewy.

[Gadritan]

Why was our Reggie Wayne for Adrian Peterson trade rejected? That trade is fair and helps both teams...

I hate it when owners get all jewy.

Eh, it was an ok trade from a needs perspective, but player for player value it was off. That's pretty much what I gathered.

Tbh I didn't even remember making the offer this morning. Almost cut my thumb off the other day and was on some pain meds (which wreck my face lol).

[Boyiee]

Added Schuab to my list of available in IDP. Bunch of awesome LB's in there too. Come and get it.

[Tyr]

I need an explanation why, if both owners (Gadritan and I) want to do a trade that is arguably fair (you'll find Wayne/Adrian supporters), and that help both teams at positions they want, why it is so easily vetoable.

League vetoes or commish vetoes should be for trades like Reggie Wayne for Kendall Hunter, or Adrian Peterson for Justin Tucker...NOT trades that make sense.

[Bregor]

Yeah I agree. I'm the commissioner of both my IRL baseball and football leagues. My policy has been that unless a trade is so unbalanced as to be obvious, or there is evidence of collusion, you never veto a trade. Wayne for Peterson isn't that bad, people need to get over themselves.

[Moss]

Yeah I agree. I'm the commissioner of both my IRL baseball and football leagues. My policy has been that unless a trade is so unbalanced as to be obvious, or there is evidence of collusion, you never veto a trade. Wayne for Peterson isn't that bad, people need to get over themselves.

Agreed. I have found in the past that if you cross that line, it's hard to establish what a "fair" trade is anymore. Unless it is someone being egregiously taken advantage of or collusion, it passes. But there isn't anyone in my money league that is dumb enough to make a vetoable trade for either reason so it isn't an issue anymore.

[Demosthenes11]

garditan, are you kidding me with that trade proposal? lol

[Arvin]

vikings defense why god whyyyyyyy

[jimbo]

been a bit too busy irl to check but all this veto talk has me taking a closer look at my bg teams. first in pts in bge and im only 3-4 D:

[Moss]

garditan, are you kidding me with that trade proposal? lol

blame it on the vi- vi- vi- vi- vi- vicodin

[kisada]

wayne for AP is imbalanced but if it fills needs and it's not collusion then it probably shouldn't be vetoed. as others said, where do you draw the line in the future?

[Omnipotent]

You only know how to use collusion in a sentence from The League

[chapstick]

Started Doug Martin this week.

*success kid*

[Cail]

vikings defense why god whyyyyyyy

^this but it doesnt matter cuz this:

Started Doug Martin this week.

*success kid*

also percy!

[Conrad]

skirkle pls

I haven't looked at your team lol, let me see what looks good

[Xajii]

I need an explanation why, if both owners (Gadritan and I) want to do a trade that is arguably fair (you'll find Wayne/Adrian supporters), and that help both teams at positions they want, why it is so easily vetoable.

League vetoes or commish vetoes should be for trades like Reggie Wayne for Kendall Hunter, or Adrian Peterson for Justin Tucker...NOT trades that make sense.

He's mentioned no less than three times now that he was hopped up on drugs and regrets the offer. Any further whining from you makes you sound like a rapist. A trade rapist.

[Tweek]

You only know how to use collusion in a sentence from The League

was thinking the same thing

[Tweek]

i started dmartin in one league!
i'm playing vs dmartin in 2 other leagues