Hey Ryko

[Qalbert]

I DON'T WANNA WAIT!

fuck now i have that song stuck in my head

[tyven]

You are right, it is an insurance system where the woman will be taken care of financially for the time she is married.

and in a lot of cases the time after she is married. fucking whore

[Linliel]

You are right, it is an insurance system where the woman will be taken care of financially for the time she is married.

Works both ways actually. At least in this country. idk what ass-backwards country you come from but we have gender equality along those lines here.

[Demosthenes]

Die.

Nigga fuck you. Michelle Williams could have gotten it. Miss Jacobs was also pretty foxy.

[Linliel]

Then you can't follow conversations. We agreed that he wasn't to blame. We disagreed that he can only be viewed as right.

Oh well, Leroy + Sera conversations, I just skim them

[Odon]

Works both ways actually. At least in this country. idk what ass-backwards country you come from but we have gender equality along those lines here.

No you don't.

[Demosthenes]

fuck now i have that song stuck in my head

Don't ever watch past season 1.

[Chun Liroy]

As far as I'm concerned they're doing the guy/girl being cheated on a favor by showing them the bitch/fucker is a cheating whore. If they do it with that person, they'd do it with anyone else. The less time spent in a sham of a relationship, the better

bullshit at her being the only one in the wrong.

This. If he knew, and hubby was not/would not be cool with it, it was wrong.

She is to blame, but they're both wrong.

Morals are relative.

Who knew?

Get your shit together Lin.

[Linliel]

No you don't.

Show me where in UK law if I, as a hypothetical wife, with assets, aren't potentially liable to cough up half of them to my husband if he decides to be a douchebag and want them?

[Linliel]

Get your shit together Lin.

whatever, tl;dr, it was a stupid conversation

[Chun Liroy]

He was talking about you guys having equality. Now I'm not agreeing one way or another, I don't know shit about UK law, but cmaaaaan lin

[Linliel]

He was talking about you guys have equality. Now I'm not agreeing one way or another, I don't know shit about UK law, but cmaaaaan lin

oh my god, what part of "along those lines" did you not read

[Linliel]

fucking leroy, got a hardon for me all the time

[Ragnell]

[Qalbert]

"try so hard motherfuckers wanna fine me"

[Odon]

Show me where in UK law if I, as a hypothetical wife, with assets, aren't potentially liable to cough up half of them to my husband if he decides to be a douchebag and want them?

LOL

http://www.dailymail.co.uk/home/you/...-man.htmlWhere the law lies
if you’re a
higher-earning wife

• The law treats men and women equally.
• It looks first at needs (housing and expenditure), sharing (surplus wealth) and compensation (if one person has given up their career to look after the family).
• There are no hard and fast rules about
  exactly how much your husband will be awarded. A court will look at how long you’ve been together, how much money you went into the marriage with, and the standard of living he has become used to.

• Where income is significant, matrimonial assets will almost always be shared equally, unless there’s a good reason against this – for example, a short marriage or inheritances.
• Paying monthly maintenance to men is still relatively rare and usually happens only in cases where the husband has given up his career to look after the children. To avoid paying regular alimony, you are usually advised to offer a lump sum in the settlement on top of the marital assets split, which is seen as compensation for his disadvantage in the workplace.
• For more advice, visit insidedivorce.com or go to the Starting Over Show in Brighton on 15 March (startingovershow.co.uk)

So in those rare instances where the woman is a power rich hungry bitch and for some reason dates a broke ass nigga, sure that dude is getting paid. Tell me how often that happens. Just try and act like that is a high number, just do it.

[Demosthenes]

I can read the first one okay, it is hard to hold my laughter in for the second.

[MF Perm tha Fineass]

http://i764.photobucket.com/albums/x...lackey-fck.gif

[Chun Liroy]

fucking leroy, got a hardon for me all the time

Oh, well then my bad.

Also, you came after me first dipshit.

[Demosthenes]

LOL

http://www.dailymail.co.uk/home/you/...-man.htmlWhere the law lies
if you’re a
higher-earning wife

• The law treats men and women equally.
• It looks first at needs (housing and expenditure), sharing (surplus wealth) and compensation (if one person has given up their career to look after the family).
• There are no hard and fast rules about
  exactly how much your husband will be awarded. A court will look at how long you’ve been together, how much money you went into the marriage with, and the standard of living he has become used to.

• Where income is significant, matrimonial assets will almost always be shared equally, unless there’s a good reason against this – for example, a short marriage or inheritances.
• Paying monthly maintenance to men is still relatively rare and usually happens only in cases where the husband has given up his career to look after the children. To avoid paying regular alimony, you are usually advised to offer a lump sum in the settlement on top of the marital assets split, which is seen as compensation for his disadvantage in the workplace.
• For more advice, visit insidedivorce.com or go to the Starting Over Show in Brighton on 15 March (startingovershow.co.uk)

So in those rare instances where the woman is a power rich hungry bitch and for some reason dates a broke ass nigga, sure that dude is getting paid. Tell me how often that happens. Just try and act like that is a high number, just do it.

Daily Mail. LOL