The Ant-man trailer was so boring that the standout line was Rudd asking if it was too late to change the name. Did they even name/show the villain? Felt like there was no driving force behind why he'd be Ant-man in the first place.
In other words, if Ant-Man is terrible (which I actually think it'll do well) it may affect future "rural" properties like Dr. Strange or Inhumans. It may not. I'm just saying this year is a year where Marvel needs to deliver. It's not like other movies are going to suck, but people would probably be less likely to see a movie of a remote character if this fails. That's all I'm saying.
Jesus people.
You heard it folks, being disappointed with a lackluster trailer is unreasonable. It's a superhero movie. One can reasonably expect good guy, bad guy, and why they're fighting from the trailer(s). My point was that this particular trailer was boring, not that the movie is going to suck.
Enough bitching. Let's talk more about those sweet milf knocks.
Spoiler: show
Spoiler: show
What? Dr. Strange is set already. Inhumans is also set. Marvel Studios is so far into money & popularity right now they could release whatever they want, have it be a flop, and still have the clout to continue to release whatever they want.
They don't need to deliver at all, they did this already when it counted (All of Phase 1). Guardians of the Galaxy just recently taught Marvel movie goers that even the obscure in Marvel is a potential hit and worth seeing as well. Ant-Man will do just fine and is guaranteed seats even if it's sub-par (which it won't be).
Nah people are still gonna see Marvel and go see it.
Btw, while on the subject of Marvel "flops" this guy effectively describes my thoughts, and why I enjoyed, Iron Man 3: http://blip.tv/the-blockbuster-buste...buster-7139955
^ correct answer
Meta.
I never said it would flop. I said they have to be careful.