Killer wins tax-funded sex change.

**hey** · 2012-09-07 07:10

Plow: the voice of reason.

That's sad.

**AidenCarby** · 2012-09-07 07:13

Cause rape isn't used as a tool of intimidation and dominance or anything. C'mon, ya'll niggas never accidentally flipped onto an episode of Oz while looking for the Cinemax porn as a kid?

**hey** · 2012-09-07 07:29

Originally Posted by Sera

No, idiot. What is absurd is that it took $80k worth of legal proceedings to come to a conclusion, and the wrong conclusion at that. The fact that it was even considered for that long is ridiculous. The case should have gone something like this:

"Court is in session. Ok, this convicted murderer wants the state to pay for their gender reassignment surgery? LOL NO! Case dismissed."

Which would then be followed by a million dollars in appeals. After which, even if she lost (she wouldn't have), she could just sue the state for 20k to pay for the surgery, which she'd win.

**Plow** · 2012-09-07 08:59

Originally Posted by AidenCarby

Cause rape isn't used as a tool of intimidation and dominance or anything. C'mon, ya'll niggas never accidentally flipped onto an episode of Oz while looking for the Cinemax porn as a kid?

a. you're right, it occasionally is

b. oz? really? you realize you can see real version of oz all over tv or youtube or whatever at this point, right?

c. ass is a commodity in there

a transsexual ass is quite a valuable commodity in there

a commodity which people will fight quite viciously for ownership of

**Patriarch** · 2012-09-07 11:12

Glad my tax money is getting proper use

**AidenCarby** · 2012-09-07 11:18

Originally Posted by Plow

a. you're right, it occasionally is

b. oz? really? you realize you can see real version of oz all over tv or youtube or whatever at this point, right?

c. ass is a commodity in there

a transsexual ass is quite a valuable commodity in there

a commodity which people will fight quite viciously for ownership of

They fight viciously over cigarettes and sneakers, what's your point?

**Churchill** · 2012-09-07 11:52

Originally Posted by hey

Which would then be followed by a million dollars in appeals. After which, even if she lost (she wouldn't have), she could just sue the state for 20k to pay for the surgery, which she'd win.

You're not even good at this. Why do you do it? I would never continue to do something I so clearly am terrible at so I guess I'm just confused.

I'm talking about trolling of course; if she'd "win" eventually, that implies she is the first to try this.

Sup, she's not. She's just the first to guilt trip a pussy judge into not wanting blood on his hands.

**Eurell** · 2012-09-07 11:56

Just because Hey admits he was trolling in every other thread he's been in doesn't mean he isn't here! We should trust him on this!

**Dimmauk** · 2012-09-07 11:57

I wonder how his fellow inmates feel about 20k getting wasted on getting his dick chopped off. I bet they would rather cut it off during a riot, and use the 20k on gym equipment or flat screens.

**Plow** · 2012-09-07 12:03

Originally Posted by AidenCarby

They fight viciously over cigarettes and sneakers, what's your point?

cigarettes and sneakers aren't people getting raped in the ass and turned into unwilling sex slaves

although some people have probably been raped in the ass over sneakers at some point

**quannum** · 2012-09-07 13:20

the pragmatic approach (you know .. not barbaric) is to determine if this is cruel and unusual punishment. Is it cruel and unusual punishment to jail a pre-op T murderer with the gender that they don't identify with?

what is cruel and unusual?

Originally Posted by http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Eighth_Amendment_to_the_United_States_Constitution

In Furman v. Georgia, 408 U.S. 238 (1972), Justice Brennan wrote, "There are, then, four principles by which we may determine whether a particular punishment is 'cruel and unusual'."

The "essential predicate" is "that a punishment must not by its severity be degrading to human dignity," especially torture.
"A severe punishment that is obviously inflicted in wholly arbitrary fashion."
"A severe punishment that is clearly and totally rejected throughout society."
"A severe punishment that is patently unnecessary."

If you don't think anything should be done, then you're arguing against the 8th amendment or disagree that this fits c&u punishment.

I'm assuming the federal judge for this case thinks so ... that this person is being punished in this way.

With that assumption, how do you fix the situation? make a jail just for transgenders? put a "dude" in the chick jail? pay for the op then put her in chick jail?

**AidenCarby** · 2012-09-07 14:06

Originally Posted by Plow

cigarettes and sneakers aren't people getting raped in the ass and turned into unwilling sex slaves

although some people have probably been raped in the ass over sneakers at some point

Ok then, what about the dudes in jail already getting fucked in the ass unwillingly, there are already sex slaves in prison who are referred to as "property" why should some dirtbag who killed his wife receive special treatment over any of them?

**hey** · 2012-09-07 14:53

Originally Posted by AidenCarby

Ok then, what about the dudes in jail already getting fucked in the ass unwillingly, there are already sex slaves in prison who are referred to as "property" why should some dirtbag who killed her wife receive special treatment over any of them?

Same reason we should care more about someone who is killed than someone who was almost killed.

But we should probably help all of them anyway.

Originally Posted by Dimmauk

I wonder how his fellow inmates feel about 20k getting wasted on getting his dick chopped off. I bet they would rather cut it off during a riot, and use the 20k on gym equipment or flat screens.

I guess it's a good thing it's not up to them then. I'm pretty sure if someone needed a heart surgery, they would also vote against that too.

**AidenCarby** · 2012-09-07 16:23

Originally Posted by hey

Same reason we should care more about someone who is killed than someone who was almost killed.

LOL WAT

**bechyni** · 2012-09-07 16:29

Originally Posted by Plow

cigarettes and sneakers aren't people getting raped in the ass and turned into unwilling sex slaves

pretty sure people would fuck someone in the ass for their sneakers and cigarettes. hell some people get killed over their shoes, and that's not even in jail

**hey** · 2012-09-07 17:03

Originally Posted by AidenCarby

LOL WAT

Oh, sorry i didn't realize you cared about the victims of all crimes equally, regardless of how severe the crime.

**Rhinox** · 2012-09-07 18:09

Like I've said let him rot with his dick on.

I also find if amusing you show him the respect of calling him a her.

All pleasantries went out the window when he murdered his wife afaic

**hey** · 2012-09-07 19:31

Originally Posted by Rhinox

Like I've said let her rot with her dick on.

I also find if amusing you show her the respect of calling her a her.

All pleasantries went out the window when she murdered her wife afaic

It's not really about respect. She/her are words used to refer to women. Why would i use he/him to refer to a woman? Doesn't make any sense.

**Tajin** · 2012-09-07 19:34

Lets argue semantics! 3.. 2... 1...
She cant have married her wife. Just saying

**hey** · 2012-09-07 19:34

Originally Posted by Tajin

She cant have married her wife. Just saying

And yet she did.

Thread: Killer wins tax-funded sex change.

Thread Tools

Killer wins tax-funded sex change.

Re: Killer wins tax-funded sex change.

Latest Threads

Up & Coming Threads

Hottest Threads