Kluwe Owns Anit-Gay State Delegate

[Yugl]

As long as they only apply to willing members of that sect and do not infringe upon the legal rights of others, I have no problem. Fuck them anyways; why would you want to join them?

[archibaldcrane]

Lol, still pumping that seperate but equal eh Yugl.

[Yugl]

Oh of course; that's why I said to make civil unions replace the text of marriage.

[quannum]

dey took ar jobs word!

[kuronosan]

Oh of course; that's why I said to make civil unions replace the text of marriage.

You're advocating political correctness. It's like calling smoke "combustion byproduct".

[Yugl]

Replacing marriage with civil union bestows certain rights granted by marriage, rights typically denied, upon the LGBT community. Do you know this Kurono? This isn't about being politically correct.

If a Federal law says "Married couples receive X benefit", some states will allow the denial of said benefit if you only have a civil union.

http://www.factcheck.org/what_is_a_civil_union.html

Edit: The page is old, but the info is still relevant. Wiki has more "recent" stuff I imagine, so if you complain about the date, go there next and look this shit up.

[kuronosan]

Then I think I misunderstood you. Your point is that they should make it so that they are defined as one and the same, legally.

My point is that they shouldn't have to redefine it. They should just make it that way.

We're saying the same thing, going to point C. You're just going through B and I'm going through D.

[archibaldcrane]

Replacing marriage with civil union bestows certain rights granted by marriage, rights typically denied, upon the LGBT community. Do you know this Kurono? This isn't about being politically correct.

If a Federal law says "Married couples receive X benefit", some states will allow the denial of said benefit if you only have a civil union.

http://www.factcheck.org/what_is_a_civil_union.html

Edit: The page is old, but the info is still relevant. Wiki has more "recent" stuff I imagine, so if you complain about the date, go there next and look this shit up.

I'm sure each state and municipality is going to hop right to changing every single law on the books pertaining to marriage. That sure is efficient and realistic.

Even if its the "if i were dictator this is what id do" ideal, chastizing those who push for the realistic path to full rights for homosexuals is bad and you should feel bad.

[Yugl]

Yeah because every state is just burning to implement same-sex marriage as we speak.

[quannum]

Yeah because every state is just burning to implement same-sex marriage as we speak.

states aren't doing the morally obvious thing, so let's swap 2 words instead.

[Patriarch]

That letter

10/10

[Yugl]

states aren't doing the morally obvious thing, so let's swap 2 words instead.

Goes to show how much you know. Many inequalities stem at the federal level. And the idea isn't to change the two words; the idea is to collapse them both into Civil Unions.