Item Search
     
BG-Wiki Search
Page 146 of 367 FirstFirst ... 96 136 144 145 146 147 148 156 196 ... LastLast
Results 2901 to 2920 of 7340
  1. #2901
    D. Ring
    Join Date
    Jul 2008
    Posts
    4,529
    BG Level
    7
    FFXI Server
    Phoenix

    Pile on enough refresh to where you can rely entirely on 5, and DD tanking is a thing again. lol

  2. #2902
    Old Odin
    Join Date
    Oct 2006
    Posts
    6,198
    BG Level
    8
    FFXI Server
    Asura

    Quote Originally Posted by dasva View Post
    It just said damage. I seriously doubt they'd go to the effort to make it so different forms of damage had different enmity calcs. Though only c5 getting lowered as far as cures go.
    this definitly pushes whm more ahead as a prominent healer in longer fights

  3. #2903
    TIME OUT MOTHERFUCKER

    Join Date
    Nov 2007
    Posts
    3,885
    BG Level
    7
    FFXI Server
    Ragnarok

    I wish I could just have my new toy already, but they seem to have forgotten about it again.

  4. #2904
    Old Odin
    Join Date
    Oct 2006
    Posts
    6,198
    BG Level
    8
    FFXI Server
    Asura

    Quote Originally Posted by Tarage View Post
    I wish I could just have my new toy already, but they seem to have forgotten about it again.
    If I would get everytime 1 buck because of a smn bitching for new avatars I would be rich and no need to work!

  5. #2905
    Resident Moogle
    Join Date
    Mar 2007
    Posts
    13,222
    BG Level
    9
    FFXI Server
    Asura

    Kinda sorta exciting that the emnity changes might have enough impact to drive us back to old times (outside of VW, since emnity still won't matter in there with temp spam), with dedicated tanks, the old standard positioning setups for support/mages, etc.

    Really depends on how much that att/def ratio means for anything not pumping up on PDT or Def gear.

  6. #2906
    BG Content
    Join Date
    Jun 2007
    Posts
    3,300
    BG Level
    7
    FFXIV Character
    Slycer Ilerion
    FFXIV Server
    Excalibur
    FFXI Server
    Fenrir

    FYI, the Camate post says that enmity will be reduced BY 30%, not TO 30% of the current values. However, I still think my translation is correct.

    Code:
    対象のレベルが99以上の場合で、調整前(=現状)の3割程度に軽減されます。
    Strict translation:
    "For the case of targets higher than level 99, it will be reduced to about 30% of pre adjustment (= currently)."

    If he used "o/wo" instead of "ni" as his particle then Camate's would have been correct, but as it stands, I'm pretty sure mine's correct. Maybe someone with more technical knowledge of JP grammar can help clarify.

  7. #2907
    Relic Horn
    Join Date
    Aug 2008
    Posts
    3,131
    BG Level
    7
    FFXI Server
    Sylph

    Quote Originally Posted by Kaisha View Post
    Kinda sorta exciting that the emnity changes might have enough impact to drive us back to old times (outside of VW, since emnity still won't matter in there with temp spam), with dedicated tanks, the old standard positioning setups for support/mages, etc.

    Really depends on how much that att/def ratio means for anything not pumping up on PDT or Def gear.
    In an earlier post on the changes, SE said that below 500-550 defense will be the spot where the adjustment to defense will cause you to take more damage than before on the current big-time monsters. That means that most melees (as long as they have Protect V) will be taking similar damage to before unless they put up a JA that lowers defense.

  8. #2908
    TIME OUT MOTHERFUCKER

    Join Date
    Nov 2007
    Posts
    3,885
    BG Level
    7
    FFXI Server
    Ragnarok

    Quote Originally Posted by Damane View Post
    If I would get everytime 1 buck because of a smn bitching for new avatars I would be rich and no need to work!
    Can you blame us?

  9. #2909
    Hydra
    Join Date
    Mar 2010
    Posts
    122
    BG Level
    3
    FFXI Server
    Siren

    Quote Originally Posted by Slycer View Post
    FYI, the Camate post says that enmity will be reduced BY 30%, not TO 30% of the current values. However, I still think my translation is correct.

    Code:
    対象のレベルが99以上の場合で、調整前(=現状)の3割程度に軽減されます。
    Strict translation:
    "For the case of targets higher than level 99, it will be reduced to about 30% of pre adjustment (= currently)."

    If he used "o/wo" instead of "ni" as his particle then Camate's would have been correct, but as it stands, I'm pretty sure mine's correct. Maybe someone with more technical knowledge of JP grammar can help clarify.
    I asked Camate, and this was his response:
    Quote Originally Posted by Camate
    Sorry for the confusion. I didn't actually consider the difference in how it sounded with "by," but I can see the problem now. It will be reduced to 30% of the current value. I made edits to the original post as well.

  10. #2910
    BG Content
    Join Date
    Jun 2007
    Posts
    3,300
    BG Level
    7
    FFXIV Character
    Slycer Ilerion
    FFXIV Server
    Excalibur
    FFXI Server
    Fenrir

    Difference in how it sounded? lol. What about difference in what it means?

    Thank you for asking and it's great that Camate cleared it up so quickly.

  11. #2911
    Old Odin
    Join Date
    Oct 2006
    Posts
    6,198
    BG Level
    8
    FFXI Server
    Asura

    Quote Originally Posted by Tarage View Post
    Can you blame us?
    honestly? yes, stop asking for avatars and start asking for real job adjustments. SMN is beyond saveing atm new avatars wont fix it!

  12. #2912
    First invited, last in the zone.
    Join Date
    Sep 2008
    Posts
    1,448
    BG Level
    6
    FFXI Server
    Lakshmi

    Quote Originally Posted by Fwahm View Post
    In an earlier post on the changes, SE said that below 500-550 defense will be the spot where the adjustment to defense will cause you to take more damage than before on the current big-time monsters. That means that most melees (as long as they have Protect V) will be taking similar damage to before unless they put up a JA that lowers defense.
    Well, yeah, given that the old cap was 2.0. and Ig Alima had 1059 attack, that means that @530 defense, you'd take the same damage in both systems. That said, given that you'd need more than 1059 defense to benefit from the hypothetical new system (which isn't happening) it still seems like a nerf to players in general on high-end content.

  13. #2913
    Ridill
    Join Date
    Dec 2009
    Posts
    9,653
    BG Level
    8
    FFXI Server
    Asura

    Quote Originally Posted by Damane View Post
    honestly? yes, stop asking for avatars and start asking for real job adjustments. SMN is beyond saveing atm new avatars wont fix it!
    We've been asking for adjustments for ages and we keep getting minor things that simply don't fix the core issues. At least with new pets we get to feel special for a couple minutes instead of simply being ignored when it comes to everything else. Summoner seems an afterthought even when they release new gear sets.
    The job needs an overhaul and they simply don't seem to care.

  14. #2914
    a p. sweet dude
    Pens win! Pens Win!!! PENS WIN!!!!!

    Join Date
    Jul 2010
    Posts
    25,990
    BG Level
    10

    Very curious if that one-hander adjustment is going to apply to hand-to-hand or not.

  15. #2915
    Banned.

    Join Date
    Oct 2007
    Posts
    533
    BG Level
    5

    Quote Originally Posted by Darkmagi View Post
    MNK really isn't very far ahead of any other 1h.
    Can't tell if serious

  16. #2916
    Impossiblu
    Join Date
    Mar 2010
    Posts
    10,445
    BG Level
    9
    FFXIV Character
    Prothescar Centursa
    FFXIV Server
    Balmung
    FFXI Server
    Valefor

    he's completely right. still dont understand why impetus is some godwrought treasure that makes mnk amazing, since thats all it really has

  17. #2917
    D. Ring
    Join Date
    Jul 2008
    Posts
    4,529
    BG Level
    7
    FFXI Server
    Phoenix

    It's not, BLU is in fact almost on par and occasionally better. Proth did the math on it a while ago. I'd bet 2.2 ratio for all 1h besides mnk would make mnk the worst choice in any buffed setting.

  18. #2918
    Ridill
    Join Date
    Apr 2011
    Posts
    23,594
    BG Level
    10
    FFXI Server
    Bahamut

    Quote Originally Posted by Foldypaws View Post
    Well, yeah, given that the old cap was 2.0. and Ig Alima had 1059 attack, that means that @530 defense, you'd take the same damage in both systems. That said, given that you'd need more than 1059 defense to benefit from the hypothetical new system (which isn't happening) it still seems like a nerf to players in general on high-end content.
    Only if you don't lower the att of the mob. bwhahhahahaha it's bsts time to shine in pt play!

  19. #2919
    Dr. Salami
    HERO OF TIME

    Join Date
    Oct 2007
    Posts
    7,565
    BG Level
    8
    FFXIV Character
    Selamis Bloodwood
    FFXIV Server
    Coeurl
    FFXI Server
    Unicorn

    Quote Originally Posted by Alkar View Post
    The job needs an overhaul and they simply don't seem to care.
    Yes, which is everyone's point, that everyone except for most smns seem to realize. Instead of complaining all the time about lack of new avatars that were mentioned in passing by people not even working on the dev team anymore, why not complain to SE about this? Be a louder voice, maybe they listen, maybe they don't, but at least if they have constant feedback they might listen, especially with the new guys in charge.

    The more they hear "we want new avatars and we want them now, what's taking so long already, gosh!" the more likely they are to tune out the legitimate complaints of the players that enjoy playing as a smn.

  20. #2920
    Impossiblu
    Join Date
    Mar 2010
    Posts
    10,445
    BG Level
    9
    FFXIV Character
    Prothescar Centursa
    FFXIV Server
    Balmung
    FFXI Server
    Valefor

    holy shit someone is agreeing with me for once, is this real life

Page 146 of 367 FirstFirst ... 96 136 144 145 146 147 148 156 196 ... LastLast

Similar Threads

  1. Dev Tracker: Findings/Posts (NO DISCUSSION)
    By Yugl in forum FFXI: Official News and Information
    Replies: 827
    Last Post: 2017-11-29, 17:03
  2. Dev Tracker
    By Burningthought in forum FFXI: Official News and Information
    Replies: 7282
    Last Post: 2012-09-25, 10:52
  3. Dev Tracker - Job adjustments 3rd June 2011
    By Eldelphia in forum FFXI: Official News and Information
    Replies: 200
    Last Post: 2011-06-15, 14:27