US Presidential Election 2012 part 2: Bitches love Binders

[Kerberoz]

I literally could not believe what I was watching. She has to be trolling us all somehow. Please, she has to.

http://rationalwiki.org/wiki/Deep-cover_liberal

[Qalbert]

has anyone made a joke about him playing his trump card because if not I just did.

[Weeks]

Ann Coulter isn't a liberal in disguise, she's just the political media's equivalent of Tom Green. I guarantee she would suck a cow's tit on camera if it was the best way to get her a book deal and a spot on O'Reilly.

[Gryffes]

I literally could not believe what I was watching. She has to be trolling us all somehow. Please, she has to.

She is, like BOR, hannity, glen beck at al, they realised there is massive amounts of money to be relieved of utter fucktards and is gleefully taking it.

[ronin sparthos]

Yeah there is no way in hell Ann Coulter is a deep cover liberal. Shes an oppurtunist who preys upon the ignorance of a market of fools, misguided individuals and those who are brainwashed by religious indoctrination.

The bruised fruit of capitalism as it were.

[Dimmauk]

One of Ann Coulter's best friends is Jimmie Walker. He says they talk on the phone almost daily. So weird.

[ronin sparthos]

One of Ann Coulter's best friends is Jimmie Walker. He says they talk on the phone almost daily. So weird.

You mean 'Good Times' Jimmy Walker? LOL

That just amused me in ways you wouldn't know.

[Niiro]

Ann Coulter isn't a liberal in disguise, she's just the political media's equivalent of Tom Green. I guarantee she would suck a cow's tit on camera if it was the best way to get her a book deal and a spot on O'Reilly.

She is, like BOR, hannity, glen beck at al, they realised there is massive amounts of money to be relieved of utter fucktards and is gleefully taking it.

Yeah there is no way in hell Ann Coulter is a deep cover liberal. Shes an oppurtunist who preys upon the ignorance of a market of fools, misguided individuals and those who are brainwashed by religious indoctrination.

The bruised fruit of capitalism as it were.

See: that episode of The Boondocks.

[Plow]

I asked my Republican friend that was bitching about the timing of the terrorism announcement, and I asked him why it mattered. And he said it mattered because Obama lied about it. So I asked him what was he lying about? And he said the timing. And it just got more circular from there.

that's... not... circular >.>

he's wrong, but what you said really makes absolutely no sense

[Kurokikaze]

See: that episode of The Boondocks.

I fucks with these crab cakes.

[Blubbartron]

Is that... actually Ann Coulter voicing herself? I try hard not to listen to her, so it's hard to be sure, but the ghetto talk is so forced and unnatural I wouldn't be shocked if it really is.

[Kurokikaze]

Is that... actually Ann Coulter voicing herself? I try hard not to listen to her, so it's hard to be sure, but the ghetto talk is so forced and unnatural I wouldn't be shocked if it really is.

Doubt it, Ann's voice is a bit more high pitched/nasally. The snorting/half laugh is spot on though. lol

[Plow]

only part that was close was the "uh-uhuhhuh-uh", but that was really good

[Tyche]

So I like to troll the UK messageboards. It's full of hick, hillbillies, and racist ass republicans who worship Rush Limbaugh. One dude carried on a page worth of arguments that the reason Rush Limbaugh exists is because of people being fed up with the liberal media. He said he didn't give two shits about the repeal of the fairness doctrine, saying it had nothing to do with it. I thought that was hilarious given Rush pioneered that landscape of talk radio.

Anyway, they have this huge need to discredit Nate Silver, posting this as some refute (it's an oversampling argument that's I've beaten and debunked to death). Here's the thing about Nate Silver's model that I find absolutely fascinating; he's more bullish on Romney than anyone. The right should be citing him as the reason Romney has a chance. Sam Wang gives Romney about a 10% chance. Drew Linzer gives him about a 5 percent chance. University of Illinois gives him a 0.7% chance. Richard Charnin gives him a 5% chance. Nate Silver is Romney's champion and the right throw his ass under the bus. Does anyone have any model that actually projects Romney to win? A single one? The only model I'm aware of that projects Romney a winner is the University of Colorado model, however it uses no polling data, only economic factors, and it was developed after 2008 and never projected an election.

[Plow]

relevent

[Plow]

also, coulter making one of the craziest bitches on fox (which is saying something...) basically straight up go "why the fuck are you on tv"

[Palin]

So I like to troll the UK messageboards. It's full of hick, hillbillies, and racist ass republicans who worship Rush Limbaugh. One dude carried on a page worth of arguments that the reason Rush Limbaugh exists is because of people being fed up with the liberal media. He said he didn't give two shits about the repeal of the fairness doctrine, saying it had nothing to do with it. I thought that was hilarious given Rush pioneered that landscape of talk radio.

Anyway, they have this huge need to discredit Nate Silver, posting this as some refute (it's an oversampling argument that's I've beaten and debunked to death). Here's the thing about Nate Silver's model that I find absolutely fascinating; he's more bullish on Romney than anyone. The right should be citing him as the reason Romney has a chance. Sam Wang gives Romney about a 10% chance. Drew Linzer gives him about a 5 percent chance. University of Illinois gives him a 0.7% chance. Richard Charnin gives him a 5% chance. Nate Silver is Romney's champion and the right throw his ass under the bus. Does anyone have any model that actually projects Romney to win? A single one? The only model I'm aware of that projects Romney a winner is the University of Colorado model, however it uses no polling data, only economic factors, and it was developed after 2008 and never projected an election.

Its even funnier since Romney's bounce, more and more of his supporters are coming to his blog and posting in the comments their conspiracy theories. Someone today was even like "the fact you even have this race at 66%-33% just shows your complete bias. It's obvious you're seeing what you want to see.

People really don't understand how models work. I blame the anti-intellectual movement of the right.

[Plow]

unfortunate fact about tonight:

obama is going to dominate

nobody's going to watch

fox is going to rant and rave about how romney dominated and obama was horrible, regardless of how terrible it really goes for romney (and it's going to be really, really bad)

since nobody was watching, half the country is going to hear "oh romney won the foreign policy debate? Wow, maybe I should go vote for him, he's a badass he took out the guy that took out osama!"

[Cleverness]

unfortunate fact about tonight:

obama is going to dominate

nobody's going to watch

Why would you schedule a debate during MNF, that is totally NOT an American thing to do. You are asking the American people to choose between the final debate that may decide the fate of our country for the next 4 years, or watching this man

http://cdn.bleacherreport.net/images...jpg?1295495165

How can you expect us to do that?

[Tyche]

I'm pretty sure Obama could load the NFL feed on his phone, watch the game and still win tonight's debate. I see no reason why the american people can't do that too.