I'll agree with McCrystal. That guy is pure genius and I hope that someday his story and what he proposed and accomplished in Iraq gets told.
I'll agree with McCrystal. That guy is pure genius and I hope that someday his story and what he proposed and accomplished in Iraq gets told.
^ Pretty much that. There are certain jobs / positions that if you hold, integrity can be the only principle that really matters. And if you ever wind up with an empty integrity bucket, you're done - there is an old, crude, and somewhat odd ( I don't know exactly how it started, but it seems to me to be missing a word or two ) adage to describe this, actually. Integrity is like virginity - first time you use it you lose it, and by the way you're getting fucked.
In my experience it has nothing to do with personal / professional separations or religion or 'murica. It has something to do with blackmail and other items ( which is why for example if you have a high debt / income ratio you can't be in certain positions either ). It has much more to do simply with whether or not you can be trusted. If you can't be trusted with a, b, or c, then how can we trust you to take care of x, y, and z? A good reference is an old Cold War example - how do you pick the captain of a ship armed with nuclear ballistic missiles? On one hand, you have to trust that he / she won't attempt to use them or sell to them or etc. But on the other hand, he / she also has to be willing to push the button when the boss says, knowing full well what will happen when they do.
His position is high enough to be noticed publicly, but I've seen plenty others who've met with similar fates.
Someone on twitter dug this up. Tell me when you see it.
http://www.nytimes.com/2012/07/15/ma...om-beyond.html
Coincidence? Holy shit if its not.
Dimmy you on twitter?
lettuce b real
I'd go all in as well.
Lets use some common sense here.
Officials say revelations about the affair that led to Friday's resignation of CIA Director David Petraeus were discovered in the course of an FBI investigation.What might have spured the investigation you might ask?According to a statement he sent to CIA employees, Petraeus asked President Barack Obama on Thursday to allow him to resign and on Friday the president accepted. Petraeus said he had shown "extremely poor judgment" in having the affair.
I'm glad you asked Zealot.
http://usnews.nbcnews.com/_news/2012...-officials-say
Sure, they could include the Tillman portion. There's other stuff too.
some of you are stupid, and should feel bad for being so.
I never watch fox news...
Here's more sources of that rumor:
http://blog.al.com/live/2012/11/post_274.html
http://www.weeklystandard.com/blogs/...us_657896.html
http://www.dailymail.co.uk/news/arti...ty-threat.html
http://www.breitbart.com/Big-Peace/2...zi-It-Wasnt-Me
http://basicsmedia.com/wp-content/up...nderARock1.png
Looks like you can add CNN and Reuters to the rumor list. Such irreputable sources!
pretty much the same as drudge as far as im concernde
Other articles have explained the FBI was watching his emails and discovered the affair.
Edit: http://www.newsmax.com/Headline/petr...1/09/id/463573
This article should help explain a bit:
http://xfinity.comcast.net/articles/....Resigns/?cid=
Two major points involved:
1) The FBI was aware of the affair prior to his resignation through scanning his emails.
2) And I quote: "For the director of the CIA, being engaged in an extramarital affair is considered a serious breach of security and a counterintelligence threat. If a foreign government had learned of the affair, the reasoning goes, Petraeus or Broadwell could have been blackmailed or otherwise compromised. Military justice considers conduct such as an extramarital affair to be possible grounds for court-martial." That should put the final nail in the coffin of why an affair = resignation.
Jobs like his, and like mine (though mine doesn't typically have access to the same level of intel, thank God - I don't wanna know that stuff) are all about acceptability to blackmail or coercion. If you can be seduced, you can't be trusted with sensitive or secret (or top secret or nuclear top secret, ect.) information. Period.