Iowa Supreme Court Rules That Ladies Can Be Fired For Being Too Damn Fine

**Churchill** · 2012-12-23 08:31

so you're going the US courts rule in favor of men route

**dejet** · 2012-12-23 08:33

I can think of about 100% of Men V Women Trials that might say otherwise LOL

*unless the women is on more then 1 hard drug.

edit: got to love it, the male wins "Mans world" women wins "VICTORY!!!!!!!!!!!!!" no matter what trial was for.

**archibaldcrane** · 2012-12-23 12:05

Originally Posted by kuronosan

The Supreme Court backing him is just an example of male dominance, because if a woman had done this there would have been no set precedent. They would have sent her home packing with a ticket saying "lol u cant fire sum1 4 being 2 hot".

No.

And also, props to the assistant for not claiming sexual harassment. She seems like she was completely not bothered by him talking about his boners and what not, but she obviously could've lied and said she was, twisting this firing into a hostile work environment situation (with text evidence) and taken him to the cleaners. Good for her for fighting fair.

**Plow** · 2012-12-23 12:12

it sure seems to me like there must have been something from the girl in the texts that we're missing

**Jeryhn** · 2012-12-23 12:15

Originally Posted by Churchill

Creating family problems is negatively impacting performance.

You're retarded. He didn't fire her because either his or her performance was negatively impacted. He fired her because he didn't want his wife to take half his shit - and perhaps if he wasn't talking about boners and comparing his assistant's vagina to a Lamborghini, he wouldn't have set himself up for his wife taking half his shit.

**archibaldcrane** · 2012-12-23 12:16

Why do we have to be missing something? You can get fired for your looks, good or bad, this isn't a complicated case.

**Rhinox** · 2012-12-23 12:23

if the chicks looks is a distraction for workplace productivity why is this a problem? If the guy can't work with her there what do you want him to do? resign?

**kuronosan** · 2012-12-23 12:24

How about not asking about her orgasms?

**archibaldcrane** · 2012-12-23 12:25

Originally Posted by kuronosan

How about not asking about her orgasms?

If this doesn't bother her, who are you to judge?

**Jeryhn** · 2012-12-23 12:26

Originally Posted by Rhinox

if the chicks looks is a distraction for workplace productivity why is this a problem? If the guy can't work with her there what do you want him to do? resign?

Smash it, obviously.

**Rhinox** · 2012-12-23 12:28

are you suggesting he sexually harassed her?

She did not say he committed sexual harassment.

**Jeryhn** · 2012-12-23 12:30

Originally Posted by Rhinox

are you suggesting he sexually harassed her?

You're retarded too.

The problem doesn't lie with the employee he hired, it lies with the fact that she wanted to give her a hot dicking and that she was okay with that.

**Rhinox** · 2012-12-23 12:36

Originally Posted by Jeryhn

You're retarded too.

The problem doesn't lie with the employee he hired, it lies with the fact that she wanted to give her a hot dicking and that she was okay with that.

wat

**Rhinox** · 2012-12-23 12:40

If my marriage was adversely affected by someone's employment you're going to get fired.

This is the problem with some BG liberals. They're so use to not getting any push back from any competent conservatives they see Victimization everywhere.

**kuronosan** · 2012-12-23 12:42

Originally Posted by archibaldcrane

If this doesn't bother her, who are you to judge?

Never stated that it didn't bother her.

**Rhinox** · 2012-12-23 12:43

It stated that she didn't feel sexually harassed. You can easily draw the conclusion that it didn't bother her

**kuronosan** · 2012-12-23 12:44

Well then that changes things a little.

**Jeryhn** · 2012-12-23 12:45

Originally Posted by Rhinox

If my marriage was adversely affected by someone's employment you're going to get fired.

Or he could have just gotten divorced. Sure, he might be out half of his shit, but that's the price you pay for getting to fuck your hot assistant.

Let's be realistic. His wife is keeping that card in her deck, is gonna file and take half his shit sometime in the future when its most convenient for herself anyway.

Originally Posted by Rhinox

This is the problem with some BG liberals. They're so use to not getting any push back from any competent conservatives they see Victimization everywhere.

So your argument is that the guy isn't responsible for his own actions? Lookin' real competent, gangsta.

**kuronosan** · 2012-12-23 12:45

I still think he's responsible but if she didn't take the initiative to stop it it's equally her fault she got fired.

I was under the impression that his behavior was unwanted, not indirectly reciprocated.

**Jeryhn** · 2012-12-23 12:48

Stop what? The texts and flirtation were mutual and welcomed by both sides. Shit only got real when his wife found out.

Thread: Iowa Supreme Court Rules That Ladies Can Be Fired For Being Too Damn Fine

Thread Tools

Re: Iowa Supreme Court Rules That Ladies Can Be Fired For Being Too Damn Fine

Re: Iowa Supreme Court Rules That Ladies Can Be Fired For Being Too Damn Fine

Re: Iowa Supreme Court Rules That Ladies Can Be Fired For Being Too Damn Fine

Re: Iowa Supreme Court Rules That Ladies Can Be Fired For Being Too Damn Fine

Re: Iowa Supreme Court Rules That Ladies Can Be Fired For Being Too Damn Fine

Re: Iowa Supreme Court Rules That Ladies Can Be Fired For Being Too Damn Fine

Re: Iowa Supreme Court Rules That Ladies Can Be Fired For Being Too Damn Fine

Latest Threads

Up & Coming Threads

Hottest Threads