I guess that was sort of the point I was trying to get it. But really is that a good enough excuse to warrant not advancing the technology, or coming up with something better in 50 years? Or does the old adage "If it isn't broken, don't fix it", apply here?
So I guess to reprhase:
It really depends on what military technology you're comparing. Air Superiority downright goes to 1st world powers. Frankly the only one that will really matter in any hypothetical war with NK where China/Russia doesn't intervene. Land infantry will not get anywhere with air & more modern GPS guided artillery impeding their progress.
I wouldn't venture to comment on any possible nuclear retaliation, considering the technology we have in swatting shit out of the air, ask Israel.
XI Wiki



