
Originally Posted by
Acevalefor
Biased story is bias.
We do not know where this kid is on the autism spectrum. We do not know if he is a minor or one of the adults arrested. The original story was published by the parents....of course they are going to tell the media that their son is innocent. There are many other reasons to look at this with a grain of salt.
I personally know several people with autism in various forms and work with kids age 7-10 with everything from slight Asperger Syndrome that is barely diagnosable to severe Rett Syndrome where the child cannot do something as simple as walk across the room without physical guidance. There is nothing in the story that tells where this kid lies on that spectrum. Until we get more details, we could just as easily assume that this child is indeed selling his prescriptions. Just because the kid has no friends (again, according to the parents who are trying their hardest to connect dots that have no correlation) does not mean he is innocent. Also, it appears he was arrested while in a classroom with other mainstream students. That tells me his "illness" is not near as severe as the parents inferred.
Just remember that mental illness does not equal innocence or victimization. Wait for some facts instead of getting indignant over a story written by the parents of a child that was arrested in connection with a drug bust. They cannot and will not tell the story objectively. It appears that the judge in this case did look at all the facts and dismissed the charges. Now let's see what the school district does.
P.S. I am not saying this kid wasn't wronged. I am pointing out that the bias in the story is sickening. Just look at the descriptions of zero tolerance and the "STPP".........really?