
Originally Posted by
Sechs
Since when did the physical aspect of weapons affect their damage type, aside a very few exceptions? (Birdbanes and Vampiric Claws for H2H, for instance)
I guess Ukonvasara should be Blunt Damage then?
And Verethragna double piercing?
By what logic are you assuming that Tlaplolani would have been a damage type different from the standard blunt of 99,9% of H2H weapons? Not trying to offend you or to troll you, just checking if there is something I missed to justify some sort of logic supporting your statement. (not even the first time you say that, iir)