Supposedly hes communicating with authorities via written methods
So I heard on the radio that there are "public safety" loopholes that allow police to detain and question him without reading him his Miranda Rights.
I've already read that they're seeking the death penalty because he was using weapons of mass destruction. I guess we really needed to invade Iraq so we could confiscate their pressure cookers.
Is anybody else tired of hearing that we need expanded background checks on pressure cookers? Ugh.
I was intending to pick one up soon, I think I'll wait awhile so I don't end up on some FBI watchlist lol
That thought briefly passed through my mind as a joke but I'm not surprised that people are somewhat seriously calling for that kinda shit.
People will inevitably respond to what they hear with a call to control it- if it's threatening.
Fuck, we had idiots who couldn't tell the difference between "Czech" and "Chechen" at my workplace who were sitting there going "We should bomb them"- and they meant the wrong country.
Banning the casing is hardly going to do anything, there's plenty of alternatives. While you're at it, neither will banning nails, BBs or ball bearings. People fail to realize that given a little ingenuity, common household items are capable of being turned into IED's and there's jack shit they can do to stop it, other than stop the human who wants to plant it next to a crowd and set it off. If it was easy, we wouldn't hear about people blowing each other up with bombs daily, all over the world.
Is this really happening? Wow. I mean, I get the background checks on things like guns which are designed to kill as a primary purpose, but not on something that was used against its intended design. That's just ridiculous. I really don't need the government checking up on every little thing I ever buy. (Obviously an exaggeration and I know people are not supporting this or saying it's happening). The fact that I have to hand over my ID when I buy Advil Cold & Sinus just because some miscreants feel the need to make meth with it is bad enough.
The only time I've seen people say that is pro-gun people using it as a sarcastic counter argument to background checks for guns. I have yet to see someone legitimately feel we need background checks for pressure cookers.
The way I heard it described is they can ask him questions that directly relate to other threats. They can ask him if any other bombing attempts are planned or about associates who may be planning attacks. Of course at worst, it would mean anything he said wouldn't be admitted in court. I would think there's enough evidence before his testimony to make a winnable case.
He's officially been charged in federal court with use of a weapon of mass destruction and malicious destruction of property resulting in death. The penalty can include death or any term of imprisonment.
wow, can't believe this, don't we live in america???????????