Enforcement Actions in Boston

[archibaldcrane]

Pretty sure it's been said time and time again the homeowners gave the cops permission.

Who gave police permission to search inside unoccupied houses again? That's a damn broad statement for searches of dozens, perhaps hundreds of homes.

[archibaldcrane]

Also, trees had nothing to do with their failure to track this kid lol.

[Ksandra]

Who gave police permission to search inside unoccupied houses again? That's a damn broad statement for searches of dozens, perhaps hundreds of homes.

I'd say that would go under the probably cause bit. I didn't mention that.

[Ksandra]

Also, trees had nothing to do with their failure to track this kid lol.

So helicopters (which you brought up) have x-ray vision through trees now?

[archibaldcrane]

I'd say that would go under the probably cause bit. I didn't mention that.

you're wrong and quite frankly don't know what the fuck you're talking about, go away

So helicopters (which you brought up) have x-ray vision through trees now?

helicopters weren't used - i asked if they were, they weren't. trees are irrelevant.

[Ksandra]

helicopters weren't used - i asked if they were, they weren't. trees are irrelevant.

You were shocked they weren't used. I'm explaining why it's ignorant to be shocked by it. Keep living that world where everything is on Cali standards though.

[archibaldcrane]

please, tell me more about

probably cause

[Ksandra]

please, tell me more about probably cause.

You know I meant probable. But please, continue telling us how re-re LAPD shooting a car outside means Boston PD can't go in houses.

[archibaldcrane]

keep acting like the officers in this scenario didn't shoot an unarmed man lol

[Ksandra]

keep acting like the officers in this scenario didn't shoot an unarmed man lol

....

1. what does that have to go with going into houses? I mean, the homeowner gave the cops permission, so that has nothing to do with saying they can't go in without permission

2. a guy who bombed 200 =/= two women who had jack dick to do with anything.

[archibaldcrane]

I mean, the homeowner gave the cops permission
2. a guy who bombed 200 =/= two women who had jack dick to do with anything.

1. Even the ones who weren't home?
2. What those people all have in common is that they are innocent until proven guilty.

[Ksandra]

1. Even the ones who weren't home?
2. What those people all have in common is that they are innocent until proven guilty.

You misunderstood 1. THE GUY WHO OWNED THE LAND/BOAT gave cops permission to be there.

2. fucking lol.

[edit] you seem to have two issues and you want to combine them but they are completely separate things.

innocent until proven guilty has nothing to do with permission to enter homes.

[Plow]

what did I miss where they shot him while they thought he was unarmed?

[archibaldcrane]

You misunderstood 1. THE GUY WHO OWNED THE LAND/BOAT gave cops permission to be there.

And all the other unoccupied houses they searched when they were looking in the wrong area? They had permission for each one of those too?

[archibaldcrane]

what did I miss where they shot him while they thought he was unarmed?

http://www.dailymail.co.uk/news/arti...g-himself.html

I don't know what they "thought" - but apparently he was unarmed when they opened fire on him in the boat.

[jmc]

what did I miss where they shot him while they thought he was unarmed?

Wait, what? Your not referring to suspect #2 in the boat are you? As everyone in the town still thought he was armed.

[Ksandra]

And all the other unoccupied houses they searched when they were looking in the wrong area? They had permission for each one of those too?

I am referring directly to THIS statement:

keep acting like the officers in this scenario didn't shoot an unarmed man lol

This has zero zip zilch to do with cops entering homes because the cops had permission to be at the boat from the owner.

[Xajii]

Jesus Christ ksandra the argument isn't about whether consented searches are ok why the fuck would anyone argue that ever

[archibaldcrane]

I am referring directly to THIS statement:



This has zero zip zilch to do with cops entering homes because the cops had permission to be at the boat from the owner.

I made that statement because your argument was that the lessons learned from the unruly crazy insane LAPD shouldn't be applied to the professional, well-trained, would never open fire on an unarmed suspect Boston-area law enforcement officers.

[Plow]

http://www.dailymail.co.uk/news/arti...g-himself.html

I don't know what they "thought" - but apparently he was unarmed when they opened fire on him in the boat.

your link came through with the ellipses so it's not working ><