You act as is he's a less logical target to stop terrorism than the various other blanket targets. You're assuming far too much competence in the NSA when it comes to picking reasonable targets.
Would you say targeting civil rights groups is reasonable for stopping terror? How about people already entrusted with top secret information by the government without any evidence of possible wrongdoing or traitorous behavior with close ties to a former president? Or just random people playing world of warcraft? Surely those world of Warcraft players being spied upon are deadly menaces? Ambassadors from friendly nations?
I'm not saying there's a drone outside his house or anything like that but i certainly wouldn't use the idea that the NSA wont break the law when clear and present proof that they do not give a shit about the law as evidence that he'd never be spied upon nor would i use the idea that he's unimportant because they repeatedly spy upon random or unimportant people simply because they can.
Given that it's proven that they would it's ridiculous to claim they wont.
yeah but it's mamas.
George Takei reminded me that today is the last day to file a comment at the FCC website
Nope, after crashing again they've extended the deadline until Friday lol
List of programs the GCHQ used as of July 2012 in their cyber spyinghttps://firstlook.org/theintercept/2...trol-internet/
- Angry Pirate - a tool to permanently disable a target's account on their computer
- Bomb Bay - the capacity to increase website hits/rankings
- Cannonball - the ability to send repeated text messages to a single target
- Gestator - a tool to make a message, normally a video, more visible on websites including YouTube
- Glitterball - software to help agents carry out operations in Second Life and other online games
- Birdstrike - Twitter monitoring and profile collection
- Fatyak - public data collection from the business-focused social network LinkedIn
- Spring Bishop - a tool to find private pictures of targets on Facebook
- Changeling - the ability to spoof any email address and send messages under that identity
- Bearscrape - a tool to extract a computer's wi-fi connection history
- Miniature Hero - the ability to source real-time call records, instant messages and contact lists from Skype
- Swamp donkey - a way to send a modified Excel spreadsheet document that silently extracts and runs malware on the target's computer
- Underpass - a tool to change the result of online polls
- Concrete Donkey - a tool with the ability to send an audio message to a large number of telephones and/or "repeatedly bomb" a target number with the same message
https://s3.amazonaws.com/s3.document...6/jtrigall.pdf
hrmSwamp donkey - a way to send a modified Excel spreadsheet document that silently extracts and runs malware on the target's computer
It's as if they used 4chan as the model for a lot of these programs.
http://www.independent.co.uk/life-st...e-9585250.html
Oh i'm sorry, were you reading up on something we don't like? Probably a terrorist!Any internet users who use or even read about privacy services online will be targeted for surveillance by the NSA, according to a new report from German broadcaster ARD.
According to leaked source-code of the US spy agency’s ‘XKeyscore’ software, individuals who search for information about anonymising services such as Tor have their IP addresses logged by the NSA and can be flagged for further monitoring.
Not new in the slightest. Before the internet, there was this brouhaha.
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Library_Awareness_Program
And librarians were fucking awesome for it. They stood up again when the government tried to pull a repeat with a section the patriot act.
If only the ISPs had as much balls.
But the point of the post was that agencies have had too much of a hard-on about deciding for people what they're allowed to think and know, and demonizing anyone who doesn't fall in line.*
And have been trying to pull this shit for quite a long time.
*Reading rates aside, I find it telling that the government budget for libraries has been not so hot for a few decades. I'm not saying it's directly retaliatory, but when you go to balance the budget, when you're deciding to make cuts, it's probably easier to decide to give them to those who've given you the middle finger.
Let's be real though, you know the NSA backdoored the libraries' systems immediately.
https://forum.truecrypt.ch/t/hidden-...rg-website/163
Hidden message on Truecrypt's site. Lends credence to the theory the NSA shut them down and that any future versions are probably not safe, aka like ECC.
http://www.theguardian.com/commentis...nnocent-people
You're all terrorists!
http://www.ibtimes.co.uk/fbi-lied-ab...expert-1464552
FBI lied about how they obtained the IP for silk road.
Typically in movies, when that sort of thing comes to light, defendants lawyers motion to dismiss all charges due to evidence being collected by illegal means. Let's see how this plays out. Just watched The Star Chamber this weekend...
Analyzing the data the server sent them isn't illegal though.