Page 2 of 2 FirstFirst 1 2
Results 21 to 33 of 33
  1. #21
    I'll change yer fuckin rate you derivative piece of shit
    Join Date
    Sep 2006
    Posts
    58,707
    BG Level
    10

    Quote Originally Posted by ringthree View Post
    It more signals that the Ayatollahs are worried about their power if the population of Iran gets any more pissed. The fact that they allowed this guy to get elected is the signal, not the guy himself.
    So the Ayatollahs are taking small steps towards moderation.

    I agree with you.

  2. #22
    I'm not safe on my island
    Nikkei will still get me.

    Join Date
    Oct 2006
    Posts
    20,043
    BG Level
    10

    Quote Originally Posted by ringthree View Post
    It more signals that the Ayatollahs are worried about their power if the population of Iran gets any more pissed. The fact that they allowed this guy to get elected is the signal, not the guy himself.
    Allowed him to get elected? Why would the clerics reject him? He's not exactly a polarizing figure, and this isn't the first time a moderate is elected.

  3. #23
    Nidhogg
    Join Date
    Apr 2006
    Posts
    3,562
    BG Level
    7

    because they didn't allow the last guy to win.

  4. #24
    Sandworm Swallows
    Join Date
    Dec 2006
    Posts
    7,328
    BG Level
    8

    Quote Originally Posted by Kuya View Post
    Allowed him to get elected? Why would the clerics reject him? He's not exactly a polarizing figure, and this isn't the first time a moderate is elected.
    No it isn't, but it is since certain changes in circumstances have occurred. Khatemi could have broken either way, and Ahmadinejad definitely was a reaction from the more conservative ayatollahs. The problem is that reformers are given power from the conservatives when the public reacts. The conservatives then take that power back when they don't need to appear to support reform. Reformers never have true power.

  5. #25
    Bagel
    Join Date
    Feb 2009
    Posts
    1,386
    BG Level
    6
    FFXI Server
    Lakshmi

    Quote Originally Posted by archibaldcrane View Post
    So the Ayatollahs are taking small steps towards moderation.

    I agree with you.
    Projecting moderation. Policies will not change, this is purely a PR/image move.
    They'll let the guy who speaks in more conciliatory terms be the new figurehead, but carry on oppressing their people as they've always done.

    Iran won't get any better until ayatollah blood runs in the streets.
    I'm no hawk, but theocracies are only overturned when the people rises against them and the head of the tyrants roll.

  6. #26

    Sweaty Dick Punching Enthusiast

    Join Date
    Sep 2010
    Posts
    21,839
    BG Level
    10

    it's ok you don't have to be a hawk for people rising and head rolling you can just be a radical revolutionary

  7. #27

    Sweaty Dick Punching Enthusiast

    Join Date
    Sep 2010
    Posts
    21,839
    BG Level
    10

    historically those do well in Iran

  8. #28
    Sandworm Swallows
    Join Date
    Dec 2006
    Posts
    7,328
    BG Level
    8

    Are you joking, or do you just not understand the history of the Iranian revolution?

  9. #29

    Sweaty Dick Punching Enthusiast

    Join Date
    Sep 2010
    Posts
    21,839
    BG Level
    10

  10. #30
    Banned.

    Join Date
    Jun 2008
    Posts
    6,514
    BG Level
    8
    FFXI Server
    Phoenix

    Figured I'd bump this instead of making new thread. Nothing new, it's just finally official now.

    CIA admits role in 1953 Iranian coup

  11. #31
    Renegade Philosopher
    Join Date
    Jul 2004
    Posts
    4,439
    BG Level
    7

    So if it typically takes 60 years for this stuff to become declassified, I guess we only have to wait until around 2070 for the NSA to admit all the stuff they're doing now.

  12. #32
    A. Body
    Join Date
    Aug 2008
    Posts
    4,264
    BG Level
    7

    2061 Is going to be an interesting year then.

  13. #33
    BG's #1 Hatsune Miku fan!
    Join Date
    Dec 2009
    Posts
    9,974
    BG Level
    8



    This is not the whole interview. I can't find the whole thing for some reason. I'll just quote other parts of it. From the NBC news site:

    Iranian President Hassan Rouhani blamed Israel for causing "injustice to the people" of the Middle East during an exclusive interview with NBC News in which he also called for peace, saying Iran is not "looking for war."

    Unlike his predecessor Mahmoud Ahmadinejad, Rouhani struck a moderate tone on many issues, but he deflected a question from NBC News' Ann Curry about whether he believed that the Holocaust was "a myth."

    "I'm not a historian. I'm a politician," he replied. "What is important for us is that the countries of the region and the people grow closer to each other, and that they are able to prevent aggression and injustice."

    When asked by Curry about the fact that Ahmadinejad had people believing that Iran wanted to wipe Israel off the map, Rouhani replied: "What we wish for in this country is rule by the will of the people. We believe in the ballot box."

    Curry also asked Rouhani to respond to comments by Israeli President Benjamin Netanyahu, who has called him a "wolf in sheep’s clothing."

    Rouhani described Israel as "an occupier and usurper government" that "does injustice to the people of the region, and has brought instability to the region, with its warmongering policies."

    He added Israel "shouldn't allow itself to give speeches about a democratically and freely elected government."
    http://worldnews.nbcnews.com/_news/2...for-peace?lite

Page 2 of 2 FirstFirst 1 2

Similar Threads

  1. US Presidential Election 2012 part 2: Bitches love Binders
    By Adajer in forum Politics: Advanced Shitposting
    Replies: 1398
    Last Post: 2012-11-05, 21:47
  2. US Presidential Election: Fight of the Mirror Moderates (and Moles) 2012
    By Ragnus in forum Politics: Advanced Shitposting
    Replies: 3443
    Last Post: 2012-10-17, 16:57