Page 2 of 4 FirstFirst 1 2 3 4 LastLast
Results 21 to 40 of 77

Thread: Prison Reform     submit to reddit submit to twitter

  1. #21
    Ridill
    Join Date
    Apr 2007
    Posts
    13,293
    BG Level
    9

    I would imagine the private prison lobbyists are going to fight tooth and nail against this.

  2. #22
    Member since 2006 and still can't think of a title.
    Join Date
    Oct 2006
    Posts
    28,348
    BG Level
    10
    FFXIV Character
    Acanis Lindri
    FFXIV Server
    Midgardsormr
    FFXI Server
    Bismarck
    WoW Realm
    Kil'jaeden

    Quote Originally Posted by Niiro View Post
    I would imagine the private prison lobbyists are going to fight tooth and nail against this.
    How many private prisons are there? I'm on my phone so can't research it but there can't be that many with all the federal, state and county prisons already out there.

  3. #23
    I'll change yer fuckin rate you derivative piece of shit
    Join Date
    Sep 2006
    Posts
    58,766
    BG Level
    10

    A little over 100, comprising between 3-4% of the total prison population.

  4. #24
    New Spam Forum
    Join Date
    Jul 2011
    Posts
    150
    BG Level
    3

    Hard to find info on number of private prisons vs public on my phone. I did find that in a few states more than half of the prisoners are housed in a private prison. Louisiana has somewhere around 80k prisoners for example over 40k are in for-profit private prisons.

  5. #25
    Member since 2006 and still can't think of a title.
    Join Date
    Oct 2006
    Posts
    28,348
    BG Level
    10
    FFXIV Character
    Acanis Lindri
    FFXIV Server
    Midgardsormr
    FFXI Server
    Bismarck
    WoW Realm
    Kil'jaeden

    Ok, so seems to be just a few states. I wouldn't really worry too much about their lobbying as honestly I think the first ones that will be released if this happens are the ones in state/county prisons.

  6. #26
    Pandemonium
    Join Date
    Feb 2010
    Posts
    7,661
    BG Level
    8
    FFXI Server
    Sylph

    Quote Originally Posted by Melena View Post
    Ok, so seems to be just a few states. I wouldn't really worry too much about their lobbying as honestly I think the first ones that will be released if this happens are the ones in state/county prisons.
    That's can't be the case, right? Holder is the AG, which is a federal office....they don't have any jurisdiction over state and local penalties? Have I failed to understand something about the way the law is enforced or codified?

  7. #27
    Pandemonium
    Join Date
    Feb 2010
    Posts
    7,661
    BG Level
    8
    FFXI Server
    Sylph

    Relevant:

    The costs certainly are high. Over 219,000 inmates are held in federal prisons, 47% of them for drug offenses, according to the Federal Bureau of Prisons. Most federal prisons operate at 40% above capacity, Holder said on Monday. That costs taxpayers dearly at a moment of budget shortfalls: over $28,000 per year per inmate.

    Under the new policy, judges have more leeway when sentencing nonviolent drug offenders without ties to large-scale organizations, gangs and drug cartels. If a defendant is charged with selling a controlled substance, they will be charged based on the nature of their crime; not forced to serve a specific amount of time. Currently, there is a five-year mandatory minimum sentence for possession of 28 g, or about an ounce, of crack cocaine.

    While drug-policy reformers cheered Holder’s speech, Piper also noted that the attorney general was catching up with a movement already under way around the nation.

    “The states have been leading on this issue for years,” Piper says. Viguerie echoed that criticism: “By waiting to take up criminal-justice reform until almost a year into his second term, Holder is playing catch-up and has little credibility on this issue,” he said in a statement.

    It’s no surprise that states would lead the way on this issue: state prisons house about 1.3 million people, or 86% of the U.S. prison population, putting strain on their reduced budgets. In California, overcrowding is so severe that last week the Supreme Court ordered the state to release more than 9,000 inmates.

    Texas is credited with pioneering a statewide reform movement in 2007, when legislators decided against building several new prisons and instead shifted nonviolent offenders to prison alternatives and spent more than $200 million on antirecidivism programs. The state hopes to save $2 billion as a result, even as its crime rate has fallen to 1960s levels (although its prison population remains the nation’s highest).

    In all, 27 states have now experimented with reforms, ranging from reclassifying some offenses as misdemeanors rather than felonies to providing better substance-abuse and mental-health treatment. Critical to the political durability of these reforms is the fact that all but three of the reformist states have experienced a drop in their crime rate, according to the Pew Charitable Trusts Public Safety Performance Project.

    Read more: http://swampland.time.com/2013/08/13...#ixzz2btXWlMDc
    Source: http://swampland.time.com/2013/08/13...up-to-a-point/

  8. #28
    Member since 2006 and still can't think of a title.
    Join Date
    Oct 2006
    Posts
    28,348
    BG Level
    10
    FFXIV Character
    Acanis Lindri
    FFXIV Server
    Midgardsormr
    FFXI Server
    Bismarck
    WoW Realm
    Kil'jaeden

    Quote Originally Posted by Buffy View Post
    That's can't be the case, right? Holder is the AG, which is a federal office....they don't have any jurisdiction over state and local penalties? Have I failed to understand something about the way the law is enforced or codified?
    A lot of offenses, especially dealing with the "war on drugs" which is a federal offense get sentencing guidelines including min/maxes from the feds. Drug use is a federal offense which is why the feds can still keep raiding pot dispensaries even if it's legal in the state.

  9. #29
    I'll change yer fuckin rate you derivative piece of shit
    Join Date
    Sep 2006
    Posts
    58,766
    BG Level
    10

    Quote Originally Posted by Buffy View Post
    That's can't be the case, right? Holder is the AG, which is a federal office....they don't have any jurisdiction over state and local penalties? Have I failed to understand something about the way the law is enforced or codified?
    He only has jurisdiction over federal offenses. Fortunately many state and local governments have already made some of these changes or never had mandatory minimums to begin with.

  10. #30
    You just got served THE CALLISTO SPECIAL
    SASSAGE KING OF DA WORLD
    cheap hawks gay

    Join Date
    Sep 2007
    Posts
    26,424
    BG Level
    10

    iirc Texas has surprisingly lax or no minimum sentences for that kind of stuff, and I believe CA as well. I think this is a decent change, and probably is going to roll into the momentum for legalizing pot; hopefully that's something that gets done and regulated at the the state or federal level so they can tax the shit out of it.

  11. #31
    Pandemonium
    Join Date
    Feb 2010
    Posts
    7,661
    BG Level
    8
    FFXI Server
    Sylph

    All drugs should be legalized. Should be treated like cigs and booze - you're an adult, you have the right to screw up your own life if you want to. Giving, contributing, or selling to minors should carry serious penalties, since by definition they lack the knowledge and judgement to make good decisions. Wanna sell your house for more crack? Go ahead, there is a store on the corner that sells it.

  12. #32
    Banned.

    Join Date
    Aug 2007
    Posts
    2,547
    BG Level
    7

    Quote Originally Posted by Buffy View Post
    All drugs should be legalized. Should be treated like cigs and booze - you're an adult, you have the right to screw up your own life if you want to. Giving, contributing, or selling to minors should carry serious penalties, since by definition they lack the knowledge and judgement to make good decisions. Wanna sell your house for more crack? Go ahead, there is a store on the corner that sells it.
    I can agree with this, up to a certain point. Drugs that are insane addictive and have horrible, horrible consequences (think krokodil), or ones that have a tendency to make people extremely violent and juggernaut-like (think bath salts) should still be outlawed.

  13. #33
    You just got served THE CALLISTO SPECIAL
    SASSAGE KING OF DA WORLD
    cheap hawks gay

    Join Date
    Sep 2007
    Posts
    26,424
    BG Level
    10

    Pretty much agreed with that sentiment...I think certain things are a little too heavy-duty, but for the most part I would be for the legalization of recreational stuff if it was tightly regulated as to create government revenue and eliminate black markets. I would also like it to only be legalized within one's own household for personal use and to still have limits where certain levels of possession becomes trafficking; and extremely stiff penalties for operating vehicles while under the influence.

  14. #34
    hey
    hey is offline
    listen!
    Join Date
    Apr 2011
    Posts
    7,234
    BG Level
    8
    FFXI Server
    Sylph

    ones that have a tendency to make people extremely violent and juggernaut-like (think bath salts) should still be outlawed.
    This is really the only acceptable reason to ban a drug. It's not the government's job to protect people form themselves. If someone wants to eat at McDonalds every day until they are 1000 lb, jump out of an airplane without a parachute, or do crack, they should be able to do so, no matter how stupid, as long as it doesn't hurt anyone else. If you don't want people to do such things, improve education, so fewer people want to do them.

  15. #35
    Electric Six groupie
    Join Date
    Sep 2007
    Posts
    5,451
    BG Level
    8
    FFXIV Character
    Jayne Barsala
    FFXIV Server
    Lamia

    @Buffy

    Why are we as a society ok with people fucking up their lives? Yea I agree about legalization but not because "people have the right to fuck up their lives". What is this, the Dark Ages? We just give up on people that seemingly have given up on themselves?

  16. #36
    hey
    hey is offline
    listen!
    Join Date
    Apr 2011
    Posts
    7,234
    BG Level
    8
    FFXI Server
    Sylph

    Quote Originally Posted by Jaybar View Post
    @Buffy

    Why are we as a society ok with people fucking up their lives? Yea I agree about legalization but not because "people have the right to fuck up their lives". What is this, the Dark Ages? We just give up on people that seemingly have given up on themselves?
    Because it's none of our business. Other than drugs, we don't legislate anything else that would fuck up people's lives. Putting them in jail just makes their lives even worse anyway. Not to mention the senseless violence caused by drug wars that kills plenty of innocent people.

  17. #37
    Banned.

    Join Date
    Jun 2008
    Posts
    6,514
    BG Level
    8
    FFXI Server
    Phoenix

    You just went full libertarian

  18. #38
    New Odin
    Join Date
    Jul 2006
    Posts
    8,659
    BG Level
    8
    FFXIV Character
    Sparthia Abysseant
    FFXIV Server
    Excalibur
    FFXI Server
    Lakshmi

    Quote Originally Posted by Jaybar View Post
    @Buffy

    Why are we as a society ok with people fucking up their lives? Yea I agree about legalization but not because "people have the right to fuck up their lives". What is this, the Dark Ages? We just give up on people that seemingly have given up on themselves?
    Because in the process of trying to save people from themselves we've created a black market that thrives on producing these illicit drugs which further destroys the lives of many who die in ground wars between cartels, drug dealers and the DEA. So much of the allure of illicit drugs comes from the fact that it's shunned by society and shrouded in mystery rather than being presented the same way other vices are. Marijuana has been demonized so hard that teens feel it's cool to experiment with which draws them into an underworld of dealers rather than picking up a pack of smokes like you can with cigarettes and liquor.

    It should be your choice so long as you behave within the boundaries of the law the same way we punish persons for driving drunk. Enjoy your liquor but keep that shit off the road where you could hurt or kill other people.

    We live in the information age and the more information you put out there regarding the negative effects of these substances the way we've done for cigarettes and liquor, the higher chance that persons will choose to refrain from abusing these substances or avoiding them outright. Organizations can devote their existences to making arguments for or against using substances and effect people accordingly.

    Hiding them away in a closet and hoping that no one notices that marijuana exists is an exercise in wasting American tax dollars.

  19. #39
    You wouldn't know that though because you've demonstrably never picked up a book nor educated yourself on the matter. Let me guess, overweight housewife?
    Join Date
    Mar 2006
    Posts
    22,829
    BG Level
    10
    FFXIV Character
    Allyra Arianos
    FFXIV Server
    Sargatanas
    WoW Realm
    Windrunner

    Other than drugs, we don't legislate anything else that would fuck up people's lives.
    http://media.moddb.com/images/member...y_bottles.jpeg

    http://www.rcuv.org/wp-content/uploa...-Countries.jpg

  20. #40
    hey
    hey is offline
    listen!
    Join Date
    Apr 2011
    Posts
    7,234
    BG Level
    8
    FFXI Server
    Sylph

    Forgive me, i'm sick and high on percocet. I meant we don't ban them. Such drugs should definitely be regulated. Also, alchohol and tobacco are drugs...

Page 2 of 4 FirstFirst 1 2 3 4 LastLast