Item Search
     
BG-Wiki Search
Page 237 of 733 FirstFirst ... 187 227 235 236 237 238 239 247 287 ... LastLast
Results 4721 to 4740 of 14646

Thread: Dev Tracker: Discussion     submit to reddit submit to twitter

  1. #4721
    Absolute Messenger of Promathia
    Join Date
    Jan 2008
    Posts
    13,211
    BG Level
    9
    FFXIV Character
    Blaise Destin
    FFXIV Server
    Sargatanas
    FFXI Server
    Asura

    I thought they were just saying that "Enmity+" through gear would cap higher... Could have read it wrong myself

  2. #4722
    BG Content
    Join Date
    Jul 2007
    Posts
    22,372
    BG Level
    10
    FFXI Server
    Lakshmi
    Blog Entries
    1

    If you're talking about this:
    Quote Originally Posted by Camate
    While we will not be making adjustments to Crusade, we will be increasing the cap for the amount of enmity effect that can be gained by equipment and other avenues in the next version update.
    They're just saying that they'll raise the equipment Enmity cap above its current cap of +100.

  3. #4723
    Campaign
    Join Date
    Jul 2007
    Posts
    6,633
    BG Level
    8

    Ungh... completely read it wrong.
    Yeah put that way it makes sense I guess. Higher cap from +enm (will the same happen for -enm too?) from gear, and bonuses like Crusade and Animus are in the gear cap category etc etc.
    That gives people equipping +enmity gear a higher cap than, say, DDs. So in theory it should become possible to mantain hate in several circumstances!
    Wow! Keeping my fingers crossed lol

  4. #4724
    Nidhogg
    Join Date
    Aug 2007
    Posts
    3,757
    BG Level
    7
    FFXI Server
    Bahamut

    I don't understand why people want tanks to have a higher enmity cap than anyone else. Not saying I don't want tanks to be able to hold hate, but it should involve something more than just capping higher than others and riding enmity generation to stay at a cap that no one else can reach.

    For the changes mentioned though, if trash mobs ever get to the point of living any meaningful amount of time and are a threat, maybe a tank securing early hate would be beneficial.

  5. #4725
    Campaign
    Join Date
    Jul 2007
    Posts
    6,633
    BG Level
    8

    Quote Originally Posted by Malithar View Post
    I don't understand why people want tanks to have a higher enmity cap than anyone else.
    Are you saying that you don't want the Enmity thing to be trivialized into a non issue where tanks never lose hate no matter what?
    I understand and support such feeling. Enmity SHOULD matter, you should see the difference between a good tank or rather a good group of people working together and a group of random players where everybody is playing as he were alone.
    But at the same time the current situation (where you often have to rely on niches like RNGs and Decoy Shot) is clearly not acceptable.

    In many other games there is no enmity cap and tanks have several tools (Abilities, more often passive traits) that multiply the amount of enmity generated by all of their actions.
    That would be kinda hard to directly translate into a world like FFXI though.

  6. #4726
    Old Odin
    Join Date
    Oct 2006
    Posts
    6,198
    BG Level
    8
    FFXI Server
    Asura

    the enmity cap raising istn gonna benefit much tank jobs, especially RUN wont benefit at all from it, the amount of enmity + gear run gets is... really really low, even their AF and Relic have almost no enmity +. I also dont understand the reason behind the rune enmity nerf, they nullyfied any enmity gained from runes when they made them undispellable. Why?

    i think SEs best option would be to tweak some /SJ choices around for melees if they dont want to raise the enmity cap. makeing Super Jump available as a SJ and lowering maybe trick attack recast from 1 min to 20 sec. I also dont want melee tanking to get destroyed by any means, its an essential part now in FFXI. its no a perfect solution, because white damage will still cap your enmity at some point as a melee, the other problem is survivability of the melees from AoE moves.

  7. #4727
    Campaign
    Join Date
    Jul 2007
    Posts
    6,633
    BG Level
    8

    Quote Originally Posted by Damane View Post
    the enmity cap raising istn gonna benefit much tank jobs, especially RUN wont benefit at all from it, the amount of enmity + gear run gets is... really really low
    Well it kinda depends on wether or not the +30 from Crusade will count as "+enmity from gear" or not.
    I'd be leaning to think that it doesn't, but let's see.

  8. #4728
    Old Odin
    Join Date
    Oct 2006
    Posts
    6,198
    BG Level
    8
    FFXI Server
    Asura

    Quote Originally Posted by Sechs View Post
    Well it kinda depends on wether or not the +30 from Crusade will count as "+enmity from gear" or not.
    I'd be leaning to think that it doesn't, but let's see.
    RUN cant reach the current enmity + cap even with crusade, the only AF piece with enmity+ on it are the futhark gauntlets and then there is like 0 ilvl gear left with enmity + on it, only accessoires/back/belt/neck slots left. you still have to factor in recast for enmity spells if valliance/vallation fastcast-trait gets dispelled. the rune enchantment nerf has hit RUNs enmity capabilitys real hard with the non available + enmity gear atm depending on the situation. and running non-ilvl enmity gear is not even an option for a tank job.

  9. #4729
    Campaign
    Join Date
    Jul 2007
    Posts
    6,633
    BG Level
    8

    Quote Originally Posted by Damane View Post
    RUN cant reach the current enmity + cap even with crusade
    Yes, but I don't think that's the issue.
    When you can spam Flash/Foil/BlankGaze/Geistwall non stop you basically stay at the top of the current cap, as long as your MP allows you to.
    The issue is more than that cap is too low and DDs can reach it as well by doing damage.

    The only possible issue I see with this is the dispel of Inspiration, as you mentioned.

  10. #4730
    Old Odin
    Join Date
    Oct 2006
    Posts
    6,198
    BG Level
    8
    FFXI Server
    Asura

    Quote Originally Posted by Sechs View Post
    Yes, but I don't think that's the issue.
    When you can spam Flash/Foil/BlankGaze/Geistwall non stop you basically stay at the top of the current cap, as long as your MP allows you to.
    The issue is more than that cap is too low and DDs can reach it as well by doing damage.

    The only possible issue I see with this is the dispel of Inspiration, as you mentioned.
    you cant spam if your Inspiration trait gets dispelled form vallation/valliance, which can happen in 1/3 of the fights. and spamming it can be very MP intensiv, there isnt much refresh gear you can sport on RUN if you are going -DT/MDT/PDT, its not like RUN is sporting some form of ochain that gives you limitless MP. IMHO the rune enmity nerf needs to be reverted.


    RUN has still flaws compared to pld with, even with a run mythic. to name some:
    -holding a group of mobs without engageing: parry cant kick in without engageing as oposed to shield blocks, this would be less an issue if it could, when engaged its not much of an issue as long as the NMs/mobs stand in front of you for parry to kick in.
    -MP issues when left for longer duration without any form of refresh (RUNs own refresh spell wont cut it)
    -enmity+ coupled with PDT/MDT/DT gear issue

    neverthless a very intersting tank job, foil and battuta (especially battuta) have some very potent effects to evade/counter stuff, battuta makes you basicly invincible for 1.30 min against any form of physical attacks, slap foil on that and the chances are slim/to non existend for a NM move to hit you.

  11. #4731
    Old Merits
    Join Date
    Sep 2010
    Posts
    1,094
    BG Level
    6
    FFXI Server
    Ragnarok

    Tenebrae+Pulse can help mitigate MP issues a bit, but you don't always have the leeway to use dark ele runes. But in any case, if you're not soloing, there's probably a brd around.

  12. #4732
    Ridill
    Join Date
    Apr 2011
    Posts
    23,594
    BG Level
    10
    FFXI Server
    Bahamut

    Quote Originally Posted by Sechs View Post
    Well it kinda depends on wether or not the +30 from Crusade will count as "+enmity from gear" or not.
    I'd be leaning to think that it doesn't, but let's see.
    It is gear not that it or raising the cap matters much... because in the end who cares how much of a multiplier to enmity gained tanks have when everyone is capping with 1 ws? Especially considering 99.9% of the players aren't reaching the cap anyways

  13. #4733
    Relic Shield
    Join Date
    Sep 2010
    Posts
    1,795
    BG Level
    6
    FFXI Server
    Titan

    Quote Originally Posted by Sechs View Post
    I mean... this means we'll be first: forced to get that item, second: forced to keep it equipped, limiting gear swaps and options for that slot. It sounds pretty dumb to me.
    Thief Knives. Thief Knives for everyone.

  14. #4734
    D. Ring
    Join Date
    Jul 2008
    Posts
    4,529
    BG Level
    7
    FFXI Server
    Phoenix

    Yeah, higher enmity modifier via equipment is pretty much worthless. It's already trivial to hit and maintain the cap.

  15. #4735
    Impossiblu
    Join Date
    Mar 2010
    Posts
    10,445
    BG Level
    9
    FFXIV Character
    Prothescar Centursa
    FFXIV Server
    Balmung
    FFXI Server
    Valefor

    Randomly generated dungeons and what reads like a not fucktarded augment system? This I like. 'Tis what Skirmish should have been from the beginning

  16. #4736
    Campaign
    Join Date
    Jul 2007
    Posts
    6,633
    BG Level
    8

    Quote Originally Posted by Prothescar View Post
    'Tis what Skirmish should have been from the beginning
    ^ this.

    Well at least on paper, I don't want to get too happy before time

  17. #4737
    Impossiblu
    Join Date
    Mar 2010
    Posts
    10,445
    BG Level
    9
    FFXIV Character
    Prothescar Centursa
    FFXIV Server
    Balmung
    FFXI Server
    Valefor

    Interested in seeing what these weapons/augments are like though. We're getting pretty saturated with 119 stuff

  18. #4738
    Relic Shield
    Join Date
    Dec 2012
    Posts
    1,765
    BG Level
    6
    FFXI Server
    Siren

    Don't worry the item lvl will eventually raise and it will all be worthless anyway. I kinda hope they use the new looking models that people have speculated will be Adoulin style RME. Mostly because they keep using boring weapon models for a lot of things like skirmish and delve II augmentable weapons.

  19. #4739
    Nidhogg
    Join Date
    Aug 2007
    Posts
    3,757
    BG Level
    7
    FFXI Server
    Bahamut

    Quote Originally Posted by Prothescar View Post
    Interested in seeing what these weapons/augments are like though. We're getting pretty saturated with 119 stuff
    Most curious about this. Every weapon type has 119s from 1+ BC, Delve (sans Katana and Gun), Skirmish +2, Plasm, and JSE sans Pld, Brd, and Geo, plus all the RMEs. Is another 119 option that relies on augments really going to be useful? I'm kind of giddy about "shields." Here's to hoping we're going to see some meaningful MDmg/MAB/MAcc shields come about, even a 119 DD shield for Bst since according to the official forums, that's still a thing. Then again, with all the mistakes in that post, maybe shields was a mistake too. ._.;

    Kind of figured we'd be going back to the other skirmish zones at some point. Would just be weird to have such a system separated into 3 tiers with the lower tiers being extremely pricey to run due to their reliance on legs and bodies. I wonder if this means Inner Ra'kaznar will be useless other than niche CP farming. :/

  20. #4740
    ccl
    ccl is offline
    Old Merits
    Join Date
    Sep 2008
    Posts
    1,016
    BG Level
    6
    FFXI Server
    Asura

    So the news on skirmish only mention wpn ? It better be awesome wpn to compete with current top tier wpn for each job and grindy enough to not be cleared day one, but I fear that if it's weapon only, the event is already dead for people with relic/mythic for their job

Page 237 of 733 FirstFirst ... 187 227 235 236 237 238 239 247 287 ... LastLast

Similar Threads

  1. Dev Tracker: Findings/Posts (NO DISCUSSION)
    By Yugl in forum FFXI: Official News and Information
    Replies: 827
    Last Post: 2017-11-29, 17:03
  2. Dev Tracker: Discussion (Old)
    By Yugl in forum FFXI: Official News and Information
    Replies: 7339
    Last Post: 2013-10-22, 21:02
  3. Dev Tracker
    By Burningthought in forum FFXI: Official News and Information
    Replies: 7282
    Last Post: 2012-09-25, 10:52
  4. Dev Tracker - Job adjustments 3rd June 2011
    By Eldelphia in forum FFXI: Official News and Information
    Replies: 200
    Last Post: 2011-06-15, 14:27