Dis guy gonna get fiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiired
Dis guy gonna get fiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiired
there was some article about how apparently its totally verboten to be like "I hate Hamas and also I hate Bibi" and people seemed pretty upset to hear that was an option.
Nuanced opinions aren't allowed these days, it's all or nothing
Tho saying "I don't like terrorists and also don't like the monstrous war hawk" isn't exactly a nuanced take.
You'd think so, but apparently it is.
i feel that's the standing judgement for many/most American observers (Hamas has always been hated here and 60%ish of Americans now disapprove of the assault on Gaza). the loudest just tend to drown out other discussion as usual and the pro-Israeli bias in our media and government is intense.
that said using that fundamental basis (which i share) to both sides it and pretend there's a hard ethical equivalency between the Israelis and the Palestinians is moral cowardice of the first order.
polling in wartime is nebulous but it's always wild to me people ignore p much every poll done among Palestinians in years that show the majority don't support Hamas. they would probably lose a free election tomorrow (as would Fatah certainly). Pallies deserve better leaders.
https://www.nbcnews.com/news/world/g...ion-rcna144183
tldr support for Hamas at 34%, before the war it was 12%(!), war fever/solidarity temporarily spiked it to 42% in December. the Palestinians do not like Hamas but it will be a long time before Western media explores that facet of the conflict.
also fun tidbit 1% of them approve of the US handling of the war let that anti-American hatred fester for a worthless ally babyyyyy
I wouldn't say they're worthless. They provide a more localized target for haters and gave us Gal Gadot (though seems like more than a few people here view that as a negative)
you're right, it's an actively hamrful alliance to our interests which are not aligned and never have been
Speaking of media bias don't know if this came up here before but (sorry for the debate bro, but it was the most succinct example I saw)
https://www.youtube.com/shorts/OZ0mI54igAk
Which part of this is bad, please tell me how to feel.
also fuck you for making me watch a youtube short, what a worthless format.
You'd prefer a tiktok, what are you some kind of communist?
Tbf a big part of the problem there is that "Palestinian Authorities" generally speaking means Hamas. If you're already coming into it with a certain viewpoint, it can be pretty easy for one to just automatically look at any news from the Palestinian side as "well this is just terrorist propaganda"
roughly 3/5 independent Palestinians live in the West Bank under Fatah rule rather than 2/5 in Gaza under Hamas rule (along with 1.5 million in Israel and millions more in foreign exile). only those with profound and fundamental ignorance of the region would think Palestinian authorities generally indicates Hamas, regardless of the issue of identifying an entire peoples by their government in a place that has gone without elections for 20 years, and the last ones resulted in civil war.
Profound and fundamental ignorance is a core component of modern day life.
I wrote a small tampermonkey script to automatically change the shorts/{id} link to the watch?v={id} link style when actually on the Youtube site. I just uploaded it to my github. You can get it here.
Edit: Wrote the script a while ago when YT shorts started to take off. I absolutely hate the volume controls and the "scroll" functionality.