(with a fertility rate of 6 vs. the rest of the country's 2 or w/e)
(with a fertility rate of 6 vs. the rest of the country's 2 or w/e)
It's pretty weird that so many major religions espouse excessive reproduction.
Almost like they're a cult that wants to have as many members as possible or something
Settlers aren't "innocent" nor are they "civilians" dawg. That whole region is illegally occupied. They're enemy combatants down to the last man woman and child.
I've been told that decolonialization is best served extra crispy.
That city was established by Israel in 1949, you're only calling the people there settlers at that point if you have a clear agenda (like said account cheering on a terrorist organization)
Wasn't the Golan Heights Syrian territory until Israel seized it in 1967?
Sent from my SM-A546U using Tapatalk
Wikipedia says modern Katzrin was founded by Israeli settlers in 1977.
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Katzrin
Sent from my SM-A546U using Tapatalk
I'm talking about Kiryat Shmona, where that picture is from
Ah, I was referring to this rocket attack.
https://www.ynetnews.com/article/hknfswin0
Sent from my SM-A546U using Tapatalk
The rocket attacks were there but the fire has obviously spread to the surrounding areas
With this line of thinking, we should look at every single palestenian man, woman and child that supported hamas, and that are part of the 75% that approved of what hamas did on Oct 7th as enemy combatants and we should be similarly happy they're being blown to bits?
Source:
https://www.reuters.com/world/middle...es-2023-12-14/
anyone that runs is hamas.
anyone that doesn't run is well-disciplined hamas?
As a general rule, at this point in history, most instances of further decolonization would be hilariously counterproductive because it would mean addressing instances of setcol that are in fact pillars of the modern world that prevent further colonization (i.e. bye-bye U.S., hello Russian and Chinese empires)
It makes sense from the standpoint of the aggrieved to want to settle the score, but at some point losses are more or less set in stone and everyone else moves forward. After that point, other people have a stake in preventing your upending of the status quo no matter how much your initial cause is just.
This [the chronological passage of time] is the same reason why reparations have become a non-starter even though, logically, it makes perfect moral and legal sense right after the harm.
TL;DR - The statute of limitations has passed on settlerism. Tuck and Yang are idiots whose academia literally depends on making demands they refuse to justify in any metric beyond "something bad happened three hundred years ago"
Well hold on let's hear the man out
Sent from my SM-N981U using Tapatalk
make the Apache great again