McElwain gonna be the new Florida coach most likely.
Foley meeting at McElwain's house.
McElwain gonna be the new Florida coach most likely.
Foley meeting at McElwain's house.
Yeeeah. Crazy right? lol, he came in, went 11-2 with RichRod's players and everyone's like HE'S DA BEST. Oops.
McElwain's house, holy fuck. I should coach CSU
![]()
#3 TCU so excite - suck it FSU
FSU has moved down each week while winning...
I'm going to laugh so hard if they play Tech like they've played their last 5 games and they end up 13-0 and ranked #5.
it'll be well deserved. No one wants to watch them get blown out to Bama or Oregon
The chances they win and move down again are zero. Absolutely zero. Ohio State can put in Peyton Manning and beat Wisconsin by 60, they aren't moving up. The committee will end in it's inaugural season. The ACC will burn it to the ground. Say what you want about FSU, they're defending national champs and won 28 straight football games. The fact that they're #4, behind 3 teams with a loss, is a complete joke.
ESPN has never been more transparent. FSU vs. Alabama is a huge game. Big money. And they are doing everything they can to make it happen. As an FSU fan I am disgusted at the lack of respect but as a college football fan I am eagerly looking forward to two CFB powers squaring off.
I knew MN was going to drop after that loss, but I didn't think they were going to get bumped. It's looking like Outback or Holiday bowl for them.
Holy shit the mad is hilarious.
A) I don't give a fuck, personally, that FSU are the defending national champs. This team isn't that team, and as many have said, is the biggest mistake people make; comparing the two. But hey, they've won every game, so obviously in AP Poll times, we should just rank em #1 because fuck it. Hell no. At least the committee has the balls to drop em when they aren't deserving. They barely beat Florida for fuck sakes.
Tyche is right, though. There is zero chance they get dropped from the Top 4 unless they lose, then they're donezo.
@Anoat; ESPN and transparent? Didn't you see how mad Danny Kanell was? Least you have him there, :^) Not to mention there's tons of talking heads there defending FSU as deserving of #1. As long as you're top 4, this shit shouldn't matter either way. I wouldn't want to be #2/3 anyway due to having to go to the Rose Bowl. -- But really, Alabama/FSU, or Oregon/FSU..or even TCU/FSU would be good games, though obviously Bama/FSU would probably draw better.
But hey, with no respect, be sure to use it as motivation as a fan like they will as a team.
I don't think Bama or Auburn or any SEC team go 28-0 as FSU did. If you want to say "well, it's only the last 10 that count", fine, but we both know that's bullshit. A 28-0 team that won a national championship doesn't deserve a 4 ranking. They don't. There's no "balls" being out on display. There's nothing ballsy about saying "well, they look bad at times, so let's drop them". Their four ranking is the committee playing punditry, and it's disgusting. FSU wins games against quality opponents. They deserve to be higher. They don't do it pretty, so what. They haven't lost. Three teams in front of them have. Give me a good reason why any of the teams ahead of FSU deserve to be in front of FSU? The ACC isn't the MAC, the big East, or the SEC east. It's a respectable conference with good football teams.
Three teams (Baylor, Miss St, and Mich St) outside the top 4 are favored over FSU.
If vegas is going to rank teams, let's just drop the committee and put in 4 SEC teams and rid ourselves of the rest of football. Why do games even matter?
If there wasn't a four team playoff, and the top 2 teams went to the national championship as they have in years past, there's no way FSU would be ranked 4. It would be 1 or 2. But since 4 teams go, it's OK to manipulate the rankings of the top 4 however you see fit. I guess to make some kind of a statement? I don't know. If this wasn't a four team playoff, and the top 2 went, and FSU was omitted, it would be the biggest controversy in college football history. But there's a 4 team playoff now, so dropping them to 4 is OK. I think it's a massive slap in the face.
They are where they should be. They're the weakest team of the top 4 and so if they wanna prove their the best then they can in the playoff.
Why are they objectively the weakest team in the top 4? Because vegas favors the others?
The fact that this is a four team playoff instead of 2 is the only reason they are 4.
I don't know, maybe it's some weird way of rewarding FSU by not putting them at 2 or 3 and sending them way they fuck out to the rose bowl. Regardless, it feels stupid as hell. New Orleans is a much better place for them, and I would rather play Alabama than Oregon. The logistics of the game work fine I suppose.
While I'm not claiming to be some guru on sports, but if it was any other sport would a team with loses be above a team with no losses? Is any other sport based purely on performance during the game and not wins? I think some sports do points but they don't do that with football right?
First of all, Vegas usually knows what it's doing in terms of H2H odds.
But I'll agree it's a slap to FSU to keep dropping them. The arbitrary committee shit is dumb, they should have just kept the BCS rankings and made the playoff take the top four teams. I'm glad the committee is re-evaluating their rankings every week based on performance, but winning ugly is still winning. Besides, Bama struggled with Arkansas, Oregon did the same with Washington State, and TCU did with Kansas. It's not like the one-loss teams ahead of them are boatracing everyone they play.
Like Anoat said, this is likely a ploy to get Bama and FSU to play each other. Oregon and Bama are 14+ point favorites, and TCU is a 34-point favorite, so the top three are unlikely to shift. If FSU wins, they'll get Bama and it will be a ratings monster. If FSU loses, then it justifies moving them down. It's unfortunate that the first year post-BCS feels even dirtier than the old system.