So once again, if X supports your objective, X is good, you accept it as fact and parrot it. If X goes against your narrative, X is to be discredited and ridiculed as bullshit.
So once again, if X supports your objective, X is good, you accept it as fact and parrot it. If X goes against your narrative, X is to be discredited and ridiculed as bullshit.
^ There's like 15 of those in this thread. Nothing new.
Sorry for not providing enough color commentary with my updating of tweets from activists in Ferguson. Maybe you could take a break from cable news once in awhile to realize that this type of behavior isn't how news is supposed to operate.
All these anti-cop posts of recent years must really get under your skin.
Have some Darren Wilson supporter updates you could provide us with? I'm ashamed to say that I don't follow the opposition to give a fair and balanced narrative.
Guys, news is supposed to operate from random biased sources 140 characters at a time.
No. Because most people are WAITING FOR REAL INFORMATION. Jesus fuck dude. All the other side has said since page fucking 1 was to wait and see. They are going to release some info soon, just fucking hold tight. Tweets don't mean shit, and laughing because some random fucking kid called the mayor a bitch was the most retarded shit I've seen since middle school.Have some Darren Wilson supporter updates you could provide us with? I'm ashamed to say that I don't follow the opposition to give a fair and balanced narrative.
Sounds like much ado about nothing. Breaking news: your dude Notorious has a biased viewpoint, an opinion you could say. I'll keep posting updates on protestors and you'll keep reading them, I guess.
Show me one post in this thread from myself saying the dude is innocent.
It's already clear Wilson is guilty in your mind no matter what evidence is released saying otherwise. God forbid anyone else tries to maintain a neutral position. I'll wait until the federal investigators, who don't give two shits who the hell Wilson or Ferguson PD are, release their findings.
Although nobody is waiting for a "guilty" verdict in the first place, let me ask you a question: What kind of evidence are you waiting for that will make you believe DW is guilty of murder? Let's abandon hope for some miracle video footage and be realistic. What more could MB's case need to show that he didn't deserve to die?
This story doesn't make any kind of sense lol
National Guard drill at south St. Louis gas station startles some residents
http://www.kmov.com/news/local/Natio...#ixzz3JUhSnxt7
At least 1,581 other police departments in the USA arrest black people at rates even more skewed than in #Ferguson: http://www.usatoday.com/story/news/n...ates/19043207/
At least 70 departments scattered from Connecticut to California arrested black people at a rate 10 times higher than people who are not black, USA TODAY found.
I asked the question before, and I got no responses from Reddit (I think I broke the circlejerk there), so I'll ask here:
Why Ferguson? There's literally thousands of cities in the US with the same disparities, so what set this off?
My own speculation is that there were people lying in wait for one shooting to happen, and it's just what they needed to push their own agenda. The data from cities where arrest rates and murder rates of black are higher? Ding ding ding! There's more blacks per capita there, so you'll probably have some skewed numbers. If there were more Asians, there'd be more Asian arrests. Same thing down in the South, where more Hispanic's are arrested than blacks or whites. Why is this a hard concept to grasp?
It's for whoever wants to take and use such an article to push whatever message they want to push. There's still facts in the data you cannot ignore, such as the fact that crime stats for violent offenders share a direct correlation to the poverty levels of the area that's a focus of the study. It's also quite coincidental that the largest concentrations of blacks in America are around major metropolitan cities, that also has some of the highest concentration of wealth disparity in the nation. No one cares about that, though. It's always about white vs. black, and nothing else.
thats not coincidental at all. it's a legacy of slavery/jim crow. also, arrest rates do not match population demographics, proportionally.
https://www.indiegogo.com/projects/p...uson-billboard
This crowdfunding campaign is for the purchase of a billboard in the Ferguson, MO area. The billboard will display black text on a white background with the text “#PantsUPDontLoot.” After some initial confusion we are working with other, undisclosed companies in the area that are willing to create and display this image. The funds collected from this campaign will be used to purchase this billboard for as long as possible.
http://thedailybanter.com/2014/11/pe...lboard-racist/
I reached out to Alexander at the email provided on his Indiegogo page, and he was rather brief in his replies. Asked what his occupation is, he replied “CIA” (I don’t think he’s in the CIA), and said that “OF COURSE!” he had reached an agreement with a billboard company. Asked to respond to allegations the billboard is racist, he said “Those are big allegations, for you.”
Most tellingly, though, is that he said the effect he hopes to have on the situation in Ferguson is “Starting the fire.”
The silver lining is that those 29 or 30 idiots who funded this thing may just end up the ones being looted. I asked Alexander what he would do with the funds if the billboard didn’t go up. “It would be extremely painful,” he replied, and refused to answer any followup questions
I don't have a source, but the whole thing is fake. Some people on reddit found out it was faked by some bored 4Chan users.
Well yeah, I'd be surprised if anyone ever had actual intent to put up the billboard, but they still ran a campaign for it, and people pledged (even if they were just trolling) so it seemed relevant to the thread.
Why Ferguson?
Because Ferguson is the place where multiple eye-witnesses claimed a cop shot an unarmed kid to death while his hands were in the air surrendering.
Pretty sure that's why.
at the national level:
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Statist...American_males
at the department level i'd need the names of specific departments to find out here:
http://www.bjs.gov/index.cfm?ty=dato...sts/index.cfm#
and i just dont care enough to spend the time on that
it's not like i'm making a particularly radical assertion, here. iirc you admitted in the police thread that departments target low income people in dui checkpoints; if you target low income people and all the low income people in your area are black, you're gonna end up with an apparently racist arrest rate.
I made no such statement, and now you're talking out your ass. I already know there's a disparity in incarcerations for race. That has nothing to do with arrests rates, and the BJS already shows proportions that reflect demographically, arrests based on race are specific per the region.Originally Posted by BaneTheBrawler
not really. if you set up a checkpoint and hand out a shitton of tickets for non-DUI offenses, most of them are going to be vehicle maintenance related. This disproportionately affects low-income people, who can not afford to fully maintain their vehicles. If a disproportionate number of your low-income population is black, that means you're handing out tickets at a disproportionate rate. The same applies to arrests.
My point is, your kneejerk defense of unnamed departments you know nothing about is silly because you're assuming that racist arrest rates mean racist cops and that doesn't jive with the blue line. It is entirely possible for those departments to be 100% honest and still put out racist arrest rates because the system is rigged against black people because they make up a disproportionate percentage of the low-income population due to the aforementioned legacy of slavery/jim crow.