Remember those girls who said they were assaulted on a bus in NY by a group of whites? And there were hashtags and outpourings of support and condemnation of the attackers and so on and so forth.
Yeah, about that...
http://www.cnn.com/2016/05/02/us/new...ack/index.html
"N.Y. college students accused of fabricating racially motivated attack"
but wait! there's more!
'University police said an investigation revealed that no one used racial epithets against the women. Instead, they assaulted another passenger and falsely reported the incident.
"What happened on the bus was not a 'hate crime,'" University Police Chief Frank Wiley said in February. "The only person we heard uttering racial epithets was one of the defendants."'
:/
Some actual Ferguson, Missouri news: City is millions in debt from trying to win cases built on their brilliant racketeering scheme to extract wealth from poor blacks.
Legal bills mount as Ferguson stands by 'failure-to-comply' cases
http://m.stltoday.com/news/local/cri...af4dfed5e.html
http://www.mprnews.org/story/2016/07...ddie-gray-case
Baltimore prosecutors have dropped all charges against the remaining officers set to go to trial for the Freddie Gray murder after they have failed to stick any charges against the first 4.
I can't believe they couldn't get a single charge to stick. Like, not even negligence, and the dude was in their custody! They, legally, didn't do a single thing wrong, even though some one died? Cmonnnn
someone smoked Darren Seals, left him in a burning car.
https://www.yahoo.com/news/darren-se...192631538.html
Who?
He was one of the bigger activists in Ferguson and was all over twitter. Great guy who self proclaims he lives in AmeriKKKa
Seals wasn't the first person recently to be found shot to death in a burning car in that area. Something is afoot
Darren Seals tweeted a few months ago.
https://twitter.com/KingDSeals/statu...47016414781440@LegendaryQueen8 yea 10 detectives pulled me and my 14 year old brother over, pointed guns on us, and told me "choose your enemies wisely"
http://www.cbsnews.com/news/massachu...er-police-say/
MA cop's wife fakes a break in and tries to pin it on BLM.
http://www.theroot.com/everything-yo...e-b-1793261221
New court papers reveal that Brown never tried to take the officer’s gun, never struck the officer and did not initiate any contact with Wilson, who was cleared of wrongdoing by a secret grand jury in November 2014.
![]()
Wait how did they decide to clear the officer of any wrong doing again?
it makes it difficult to read that article when it brings up that documentary like it's not a discredited mess of shady edits to spin a narrative.
So the documentary has been out for less than a week, but it's already been debunked as TMZ style context altering of video? Seriously?
So the context of what happened in the convenience store changes from robbery involving the cigarillos, to a drug deal where the cigarillos were part of the payment. It still doesn't change the court dockets where Wilson pretty much admitted that he used excessive force and escalated the situation.
How about they released the already unedited full video showing the entire situation which you can glean for yourself. So yes it's almost like the full context of the video discredits the narrative weaving edit of some hack documentarian trying to get publicly for his documentary by exploiting circumstance of a highly controversial case
I said it was a difficult to read article because it brings up an edited video under the claims it blew the lid off the case. It was sensationalist crap. I still read it all... just don't have to like how it's presented. Apologies. I was actually arguing wiith myself to edit that to be clearer as well but didn't and I should have.still doesn't change the court dockets where Wilson pretty much admitted that he used excessive force and escalated the situation.
But it baffles me if true that they wouldn't think this would blow the fuck up once released, i really don't look forward to more riots over this.
I don't like the style of the documentary style of the article. It cherry picks stuff and makes assumptions without considering the other answered interrogatives.
"the document goes on to show that—instead of reaching for his pepper spray, baton or Taser—Wilson pulled out his gun and admits to shooting Brown, even though Brown had not reached for his weapon or struck him."
The document says he didn't have a baton or a taser.
". Wilson admits that after the first shot, Brown started running away from him and he fired another shot, which missed Brown. Wilson basically admits that he fired at Brown and the bullet hit a building close by."
I dont see that, im looking at answers 67 and 68