Page 5 of 85 FirstFirst ... 3 4 5 6 7 15 55 ... LastLast
Results 81 to 100 of 1695

Thread: GamerGate thread     submit to reddit submit to twitter

  1. #81
    The Anti Miz
    The Anti Miz of the House of Weave

    Join Date
    Feb 2007
    Posts
    32,666
    BG Level
    10

    Yo homeboy called a free game that raised money for charity a standout.

    What the fuck is wrong with you people.

  2. #82
    Banned.
    Account locked at request of user.

    Join Date
    Feb 2006
    Posts
    9,841
    BG Level
    8

    Quote Originally Posted by tyven View Post
    Yo homeboy called a free game that raised money for charity a standout.

    What the fuck is wrong with you people.
    "Charity absolves wrongdoing" - guy who kicked this thread off by poisoning the well to the idea that charity absolves wrongdoing

  3. #83
    The Anti Miz
    The Anti Miz of the House of Weave

    Join Date
    Feb 2007
    Posts
    32,666
    BG Level
    10

    So a sentence at the bottom that said. "Full disclosure I know zoe" and your whole fucking world would be upside down right now?

    I mean the nefarious corruption by dedicating a positive sentence to a free game. The horror

  4. #84
    Banned.
    Account locked at request of user.

    Join Date
    Feb 2006
    Posts
    9,841
    BG Level
    8

    Quote Originally Posted by tyven View Post
    So a sentence at the bottom that said. "Full disclosure I know zoe" and your whole fucking world would be upside down right now?
    Not greatly, as I've said before Zoe was just a spark. Gaming journalism has been rotten for years.

    I mean the nefarious corruption by dedicating a positive sentence to a free game. The horror
    Full disclosure, it's actually the title, only image, and first game mentioned in the article. And Zoe now makes $34 grand per year just from Patreon.

  5. #85
    The Anti Miz
    The Anti Miz of the House of Weave

    Join Date
    Feb 2007
    Posts
    32,666
    BG Level
    10

    Damn, I hope homeboy kicks me a sentence one day. That's not bad

  6. #86
    Conejita's Jolly
    Chaparrita's Dulce
    Trigger warning: Fuck your feelings.

    Join Date
    Feb 2006
    Posts
    7,075
    BG Level
    8

    Would you suck his cock before or after?

  7. #87
    The Anti Miz
    The Anti Miz of the House of Weave

    Join Date
    Feb 2007
    Posts
    32,666
    BG Level
    10

    3 months after as is standard procedure

  8. #88
    TIME OUT MOTHERFUCKER

    Join Date
    Nov 2007
    Posts
    3,885
    BG Level
    7
    FFXI Server
    Ragnarok

    Can't I just hate everyone involved and be done with it?

  9. #89
    Running Hell
    Join Date
    Apr 2010
    Posts
    1,232
    BG Level
    6
    FFXIV Character
    Curly Brace
    FFXIV Server
    Hyperion

    Quote Originally Posted by Kuya View Post
    I think regarding the issue of inclusiveness in gaming media, it's ultimately about what's important to you and your life experiences. As a bisexual black male, I DO want to see more media that reflects my preferences and gives me options. I personally don't feel doing this negatively affects games, and I don't think you really have any objective evidence to claim otherwise.
    I think there is some miscommunication going on here. I don't recall anyone saying they would be against more inclusive games as a generality. The issue arises when people attack or otherwise question why current developers don't make those types of games themselves. Instead of insisting that the current devs should change their methods, maybe some new devs who want to make those types of games should step up to bat and make their own. That way you aren't hindering the current progress of games people already enjoy and instead add to the pool of potentially good games.

    It's like the only restaurant in a town serving Pizza and someone suggesting "Hey I don't really like Pizza, you should make Hamburgers for people like me." Why should they feel obligated to change their menu when the optimal solution is to simply open another restaurant so everyone gets what they want? Pizza place still serves the same amount of pizzas to the people who love pizza and the Hamburger place has a special niche with the people who only want Hamburgers. And shit there will always be plenty of people who just enjoy good food who can choose from both.

    Sorry if I'm missing a vital point somewhere, and I don't really give two shits about this whole #GG nonsense as it basically boils down to "lol, internet" levels of self-importance, but this just stuck out to me as a strange sense of logic.

  10. #90
    Banned.

    Join Date
    Jun 2008
    Posts
    6,514
    BG Level
    8
    FFXI Server
    Phoenix

    yea guys don't questions devs fuck

  11. #91
    Banned.

    Join Date
    Jun 2008
    Posts
    6,514
    BG Level
    8
    FFXI Server
    Phoenix

    no wait questions devs about every single menial detail (ex. graphics in Watchdogs) but leave that inclusiveness bullshit out of it

  12. #92
    Banned.

    Join Date
    Jun 2008
    Posts
    6,514
    BG Level
    8
    FFXI Server
    Phoenix

    Also, in case it wasn't clear, unlike social justice, game development is a zero-sum game. The more funding there is for rehashed, non-inclusive bullshit made by the status quo developers, the less funding there is for the "other type" of developers trying to make other things.

  13. #93
    Mr. Anna Kendrick
    BGs Worst Golde Abuser

    Join Date
    Jul 2007
    Posts
    10,996
    BG Level
    9
    FFXIV Character
    Charles Barkley
    FFXIV Server
    Faerie
    FFXI Server
    Quetzalcoatl

    I didn't really follow this too closely cause its not really a major issue compared to the ongoing military/political conflicts in the world, the emergence of Ebola outside Africa, etc, but from what I gather its about a chick who banged someone in the same field and it led to questionable end products. Rather than have the white knights on CNN paraded, why don't girls police this shit amongst themselves? There ARE girls who fuck for professional gain so it does raise questions when one bangs a dude and it may potentially result in professional results. But maybe if mothers taught their daughters to not sleep their way up the ladder and if all the girls shunned the few women who did cross lines and make problems and questions for ALL the girls, then they wouldn't have this problem.

    If the goal is gender equality, that women are evaluated and paid according solely to their work performance, then I'd think they'd want to eliminate these cases of a few women ruining it for everyone else when they bang dudes at work cause its girls like this that turn the review of
    "(1) How was your work performance this past work period?"

    into

    "(1) Did you bang me?
    (2) Do I think you may bang me in the future?
    (3) Was the work performance at least adequate?"

  14. #94
    I'm not safe on my island
    Nikkei will still get me.

    Join Date
    Oct 2006
    Posts
    20,043
    BG Level
    10

    Quote Originally Posted by Voyage1970 View Post
    I think there is some miscommunication going on here. I don't recall anyone saying they would be against more inclusive games as a generality. The issue arises when people attack or otherwise question why current developers don't make those types of games themselves. Instead of insisting that the current devs should change their methods, maybe some new devs who want to make those types of games should step up to bat and make their own. That way you aren't hindering the current progress of games people already enjoy and instead add to the pool of potentially good games.

    It's like the only restaurant in a town serving Pizza and someone suggesting "Hey I don't really like Pizza, you should make Hamburgers for people like me." Why should they feel obligated to change their menu when the optimal solution is to simply open another restaurant so everyone gets what they want? Pizza place still serves the same amount of pizzas to the people who love pizza and the Hamburger place has a special niche with the people who only want Hamburgers. And shit there will always be plenty of people who just enjoy good food who can choose from both.

    Sorry if I'm missing a vital point somewhere, and I don't really give two shits about this whole #GG nonsense as it basically boils down to "lol, internet" levels of self-importance, but this just stuck out to me as a strange sense of logic.
    It's a two part issue.

    1. Creating more realistic and diverse female and LGBT characters in gaming media.
    2. Not using female or LGBT characters as props.

    I feel that it's absolutely justified to attack certain developers if they are known for making games where they dehumanize a whole group of people. For example, one problem LGBT activists have been complaining for a while is that not only are LGBT characters often not present at all in media, but that when they do exist, they are either quickly killed off or presented as completely psychotic characters. In terms of LGBT representation: we've been seeing progress on both points. We've been seeing more LGBT representation and more realistic and diverse LGBT characters. So I don't think criticizing negative portrayals of LGBT or female characters is disconnected from asking for more inclusivity in media. I think they're both inherently tied together.

  15. #95
    I'm not safe on my island
    Nikkei will still get me.

    Join Date
    Oct 2006
    Posts
    20,043
    BG Level
    10

    Quote Originally Posted by Sepukku View Post
    I didn't really follow this too closely cause its not really a major issue compared to the ongoing military/political conflicts in the world, the emergence of Ebola outside Africa, etc, but from what I gather its about a chick who banged someone in the same field and it led to questionable end products. Rather than have the white knights on CNN paraded, why don't girls police this shit amongst themselves? There ARE girls who fuck for professional gain so it does raise questions when one bangs a dude and it may potentially result in professional results. But maybe if mothers taught their daughters to not sleep their way up the ladder and if all the girls shunned the few women who did cross lines and make problems and questions for ALL the girls, then they wouldn't have this problem.

    If the goal is gender equality, that women are evaluated and paid according solely to their work performance, then I'd think they'd want to eliminate these cases of a few women ruining it for everyone else when they bang dudes at work cause its girls like this that turn the review of
    "(1) How was your work performance this past work period?"

    into

    "(1) Did you bang me?
    (2) Do I think you may bang me in the future?
    (3) Was the work performance at least adequate?"
    The thing is: there isn't any evidence of any questionable end products from her sleeping with any of those guys. She didn't get any reviews from them nor anything even resembling a puff piece. What Zoe (and the men too) is ethically muddy in principle, but no actual tangible result has been observed. Aside from that, I think that many women would much rather leave this between Zoe and her ex because chiding Zoe for it sounds like slut shaming.

  16. #96
    I'm not safe on my island
    Nikkei will still get me.

    Join Date
    Oct 2006
    Posts
    20,043
    BG Level
    10

    Regarding inclusivity in media, take for example that new movie Maze Runner and why it annoyed me after a certain point:

    Spoiler: show
    The movie was, for a long period of time, about a whole camp, full of dudes and only dudes for, I think, several years. At no point in the movie was it ever implied that any of the dudes there got together neither sexually or romantically. Even if you don't believe in 'gay while in prison', statistically, someone there should have been gay or at the very least bi. It annoyed me because homosexuality, in real life, is always bursting at the seems in any place where people of only one sex congregate. To straight people this might seem irrelevant, but to someone who is LGB it just looks like straight-washing. In the minds of a lot of straight people, LGBT people don't exist or they shouldn't exist, so when they make media it seems that the existence of LGBT people is really the last thing they consider if ever at all. What this does is create this really weird situation where media presents worlds where only straight people seem to exist. Which is not only false, but it also gives one the impression straight people wish LGBT people didn't exist. I honestly found it very annoying, but I can understand why straight people wouldn't care or why even some gay people might not care either. They're used to it.

  17. #97
    Mr. Anna Kendrick
    BGs Worst Golde Abuser

    Join Date
    Jul 2007
    Posts
    10,996
    BG Level
    9
    FFXIV Character
    Charles Barkley
    FFXIV Server
    Faerie
    FFXI Server
    Quetzalcoatl

    Quote Originally Posted by Kuya View Post
    The thing is: there isn't any evidence of any questionable end products from her sleeping with any of those guys. She didn't get any reviews from them nor anything even resembling a puff piece. What Zoe (and the men too) is ethically muddy in principle, but no actual tangible result has been observed. Aside from that, I think that many women would much rather leave this between Zoe and her ex because chiding Zoe for it sounds like slut shaming.
    I'm speaking more in generalities, women should police within when women sleep around for professional gain so that women who sleep with a co -worker NOT for professional gain do not have to unfairly answer questions and accusations under suspicion of being in the former group.

    And ppl not fucking coworkers
    In General would help improve office place equality

  18. #98
    Relic Shield
    Join Date
    Jul 2010
    Posts
    1,843
    BG Level
    6
    FFXI Server
    Carbuncle

    So if netflix made a OITNB game and let you play as Boo , would that calm the feminists.... cuz id play an open "sandbox" where i could prison shank people as a big angry lesbian

  19. #99
    A. Body
    Join Date
    Apr 2007
    Posts
    3,939
    BG Level
    7

    Quote Originally Posted by Kuya View Post
    Regarding inclusivity in media, take for example that new movie Maze Runner and why it annoyed me after a certain point:

    Spoiler: show
    The movie was, for a long period of time, about a whole camp, full of dudes and only dudes for, I think, several years. At no point in the movie was it ever implied that any of the dudes there got together neither sexually or romantically. Even if you don't believe in 'gay while in prison', statistically, someone there should have been gay or at the very least bi. It annoyed me because homosexuality, in real life, is always bursting at the seems in any place where people of only one sex congregate. To straight people this might seem irrelevant, but to someone who is LGB it just looks like straight-washing. In the minds of a lot of straight people, LGBT people don't exist or they shouldn't exist, so when they make media it seems that the existence of LGBT people is really the last thing they consider if ever at all. What this does is create this really weird situation where media presents worlds where only straight people seem to exist. Which is not only false, but it also gives one the impression straight people wish LGBT people didn't exist. I honestly found it very annoying, but I can understand why straight people wouldn't care or why even some gay people might not care either. They're used to it.
    While I haven't seen the film, you are correct in that I don't care if they exist or are written into the story. Their sexuality only matters to them and if the story wasn't about escaping mazes and actually about love maybe I'd care. But I don't care and to lazily (Qalberts' suggestion), hamfisted write in something like that I'd probably not go see the movie, not that I will watch it anyways.

  20. #100
    A. Body
    Join Date
    Apr 2007
    Posts
    3,939
    BG Level
    7

    Quote Originally Posted by Kuya View Post
    It's a two part issue.

    1. Creating more realistic and diverse female and LGBT characters in gaming media.
    2. Not using female or LGBT characters as props.

    I feel that it's absolutely justified to attack certain developers if they are known for making games where they dehumanize a whole group of people. For example, one problem LGBT activists have been complaining for a while is that not only are LGBT characters often not present at all in media, but that when they do exist, they are either quickly killed off or presented as completely psychotic characters. In terms of LGBT representation: we've been seeing progress on both points. We've been seeing more LGBT representation and more realistic and diverse LGBT characters. So I don't think criticizing negative portrayals of LGBT or female characters is disconnected from asking for more inclusivity in media. I think they're both inherently tied together.
    What is stopping people from writing their own stories/game ideas that include them? I'm sure there wouldn't be backlash if you know, straight people wrote LGBT material...

Page 5 of 85 FirstFirst ... 3 4 5 6 7 15 55 ... LastLast