I think LGBT is probably over represented in the media at large compared to the actual population. Exemplified by America's perception that there are far more LGBT individuals then there actually are. Not that this is inherently bad, I mean lots of things are over represented in the media, just that complaining about a lack of LGBT in any specific movie just seems nit-picky. I mean isn't maze runner a kids show? Why would it need to be explicitly sexual in any context?
The goal should be to more accurately portray LGBT, not just pack more in movies/shows.
That argument is very annoying. When someone advocates for more well written LGBT characters, they aren't advocating for stereotypes and plopping a gay character awkwardly into a story. This argument is very senseless because it pretends there aren't examples of movies and games where LGBT characters are done right. It's also a canard to say you're putting emphasis on a character's sexuality or you're revolving a story around a character's homosexuality. In a story you don't even have to say a character is gay. There's plenty of creative ways to portray diversity in human sexuality without having to be so verbal about it. Paranorman is one example.
People who insist that including more LGBT characters will be about making a character all about their sexuality are merely showing their own lack of imagination. When we have straight characters in media, nobody says that we're making those characters all about their heterosexuality. When heterosexuality is not assumed, it is shown. Heterosexuality is just part of what constitutes a straight character, and similarly in a well written gay character, their homosexuality is just one aspect of their personality.
^ I've always tried to say that: Homosexuality is part of a character. Its not a character. Its not the character.
Since when is representation in media proportional to population demographics? You're obviously not advocating that since LGBT people are, just to put an example, 1% of the population, that only 1% of media should have LGBT characters, so I don't know why you would even say such a stupid thing.
Maze Runner, the one we've been talking about is a movie, not a kid's show. Furthermore, LGBT isn't synonymous with hardcore porn. That's why, earlier, I mentioned romance as well. If you want to equate any signs of same sex affection as being explicitly sexual, then you have a personal problem.
Spoiler: show
Various characters in the Valdemar series by Mercedes Lackey?
You seem to be implying that your argument isn't just as stupid, since it's still demanding that creators shove LGBT characters in stories for no reason because of your feelings.
Uh, I don't know anything about those, but apparently a lot of the cast is LGBT which is interesting and could be good.Various characters in the Valdemar series by Mercedes Lackey?
A kuya thread about the gays?
![]()
Bill from the Last of Us? (#5 on this list).
i believe kuya is saying that being gay shouldn't be the point of a character.
That's got fuck to do with all. That's not what the article is about, and that's not what Leigh Alexander is about. It's a willful misrepresentation. Watch a talk of hers, her whole thing is that video games are important as a medium but that the culture around them and everyone who plays them needs to fuck off so she can use the medium to push agendas that matter to her.
You are fucking going to keep moving the goal posts whenever someone says anything to try and prove a stupid point amirite?
Here you go, the best gay on the planet:
http://images.sodahead.com/polls/001...er_xlarge.jpeg
My goal posts are if you disagree you deserve to be shot in the dick.
Not every LGBTQ character has to be a main one with emotional scars in order for them to be in it. Fuck just having descriptions of two men holding hands at a cafe is more than what most authors do.
I mean we have got Nico from Percy Jackson
Renly from GoT
Armand (mmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmm armand) from Anne Rice's vampire series
fuck the brokeback mountain book was written by a straight woman.
And before you go all "well that's not a lot"
Well of fucking course it isn't a lot. NOT because straight authors can't write gays, but because they DON'T write gays. The list is so small to choose from to look at.
You know how you fix that? Have them fucking write gays.
Yeah, but in the same breath, saying that he wants gay characters there because they are gay.