Keep up the good and noble and super important crusade, comrade!
Ignorance of facts has never and will never be a legitimate defense. Especially after going out of your way to shout your opinion on a subject you demonstrably know nothing about.
I know, why can't I just see why this is super important? How could I miss it?
surprised it took this long for fem feq to bitch about Witcher 3!
http://www.forbes.com/sites/erikkain...the-witcher-3/
He describes Geralt as “emotionally deficient in the extreme. Never cries or laughs. Never expresses grief, fear, sadness or vulnerability.”
I got to about here before I completely fucking lost my shit and had to take a break from laughing so hard.
I never played Witcher 1 or 2 and I'm only a dozen hours or so into Witcher 3 and I can see how incredibly wrong this is. It's just like the writer goes onto to say, Geralt does indeed show emotions. He does laugh, he can't physically cry due to his mutations but it's obvious he's in great emotional distress, he expresses huge amounts of grief, fear, sadness, and vulnerability regardless of your personal choices in the game. To claim any of this is to literally have not played the game at all. Within the first hour of gameplay of witcher 3 you find out about ciri missing, his heartache at having lost Yen, and so much more feelings and emotions.
Was a good read, and yeah, no one should be surprised that miss "pop culture critic" and the puppeteer that is McIntosh don't play games enough to actually judge them worth a shit.
Somehow I knew that when #s typed "It's just like the writer goes onto to say" that this would be an Erik Kain article.
He's one of the few people out there who writes anything worth a damn. I haven't read this one yet and I'm not sure I will because I've stopped caring about what Anita has to say about anything since the analysis of nearly everything she talks about is so poor (with regard to video games at least) because neither she nor Jonny-boy actually play these video games. Kinda hard to go in-depth or be accurate when you're pulling shit out of your ass, eh?
I think it's a worthwhile read regardless of the Anita commentary. He describes the necessity for art and story direction in fantasy/fiction genres towards real-world issues (in this case sexism, as well as racism).
Art has always done that. Art has always been sought after to perform that need. Art has always been there shine the light on the darkness that is society and bring it's dirty secrets to the surface. To proclaim that storytelling isn't about finding greater truths is to ignore all of the best stories told for millenia.
Even if you don't agree, there are times where you can at least comprehend the angle in which these asinine statements come from. But the ones regarding the Witcher are just flat out attention-grabs from people who never played the game and saw boobs in a cutscene. The Monarch of Skellige? A woman. The child of the elder blood you spend the entire game looking for and straight up badass? Woman. Master blacksmith in Velen? Woman.
What patriarchy do they think they're referencing?
Not gamergate related but I'm putting it here since GG was trying to get gawker nuked off the internet.
The dream might happen thanks to Hulk Hogan
MY SWEET SWEET GAWKER NOOOOOOOOOOOO. and florida of all places? gdi half their stuff is about how shitty Florida is.
classic gawker. love em
https://archive.is/EUkg0
Looks like Gawker outed the brother of Tim Geithner and essentially aided in a blackmailing. So much for being a progressive site.