It's a good thing, no doubt. I just have some mixed feelings about the whole thing.
I get the father's response to the whole thing as being a reasonable alternative to the issue, however, I take the issue with endorsements from Frank Serpico (who used to be a prominent figure on the forefront of police corruption) and the "police unions" who endorsed the bill. Frank and people who have the mentality of his so called "transparent" police world grew up in a time when police corruption was the front of every newspaper in the nation. It's old school to a T, but comparing past policing to modern and current day policing is not exactly a good distinction. The missions and the mindset are totally different. And, Frank has become more of a political figure than an advocate for transparency. He's letting his endorsement build his political agenda, rather than doing what modern day policing really wants is collaboration.
That's what the issue is really about. Outside sources be damned; if you don't have two entities working together to fix issues, nothing is solved. What these people are proposing are just plain old fashioned "cleaning house", which doesn't differentiate between the good and the bad. If they identify systematic failures of a police force, they disband it instead of fixing it. In the end, it's easier to do than individualizing each review of performance and policy/procedure, however, that in itself means nothing when you A) Don't have enough personnel to fill the positions that are suddenly vacant, mostly because something of 75% of the population does not qualify to be a police officer, and B) There's a strong lack of want in candidates to fill the positions when you already have more than qualified personnel on board who can be recycled to meet the objective.
That's what my gripe is. I don't care about an outside review board; let them come, but let them work with the agency, not review it without any type of oversight or understanding of the situation.
You flatter me.Originally Posted by Bane
![]()
XI Wiki


