
Originally Posted by
Kirin
I can kind of see it both ways.
If you plan for 3 movies at once, you're likely going to get too huge or overreach at one point and then have to start snipping. Snipping can lead to inadvertently cutting something major or important lore-wise. If you plan 12 hours worth of story, you then have to cut it down to 8 hours worth of movie and pray you are able to fit everything in.
If you plan for one at a time, you need to ensure that many of the same people are involved to keep that continuity. You lose the sweeping outlook of vision in doing a longer story in the planning stages, but it does let you adapt as you go and add/remove concepts with a little more clarity instead of trying to fit it into "movie #2's 2 hours".
They've done the second option more or less, but without ensuring that continuity between staff. That leads to interpretation holes (TLJ), poor story pacing (TLJ), mishandling of story concepts (Solo), reliance on shoehorning stories to some success (Rogue One), or some director eager to make his mark on cinematic history to do something radically different because it's his pet project (TLJ), and finally the apology series done right (Mandalorian).
It was mentioned before and hit the nail on the head. Marvel is now established with set concepts and more importantly consistency. Star Wars has the set concepts in de-canon'ed previous works and existing films, but is wildly inconsistent in presentation and polish. That is Kennedy's problem, and why that comment of hers is a lot shortsighted.