Feedback Thread (Petitions to Ban Guartz Go Here)

[Cantih]

Remember Church was perma-ed twice. Spam got uppity, "bring people back", tried to get Krye, lolfuckno, Church was one of the people that got a reprieve, and went and got himself got again.

Or maybe.. Plow? But no, the user list doesn't show them banned.

I know it happened, because you were going back and forth with the person for at least a couple weeks, it was pmuch as big a blowup as Guartz has been the past month.
Debating them to respond to points, the mods enforced it, it resulted in them being banned when they kept dodging or went nuclear. And then in the next few months, your name turned blue.

[Yabby]

I don't know why people are still talking about this. We have this talk like once every few months and it shits up threads just as much has Guartz does. The mods have told you why, and you not accepting it is just as bad as guartz not accepting proof he is wrong, move the fuck on.

Also, Gred gave a good solution IMO.

I also would not be opposed to something like people keeping track of posts that guartz has to respond to before he can say something else.

No idea how this could be enforced, but this would stop guartz pretty quick in most issues. Dude never finishes a debate as the second he gets backed into a corner he runs away. If he did this, and the above is enforced, I would see his posting going down.

[Xno Kappa]

Jesus you motherfuckas are insufferable about this shit.

[Gredival]

I don't know why people are still talking about this. We have this talk like once every few months and it shits up threads just as much has Guartz does. The mods have told you why, and you not accepting it is just as bad as guartz not accepting proof he is wrong, move the fuck on.

Also, Gred gave a good solution IMO.




No idea how this could be enforced, but this would stop guartz pretty quick in most issues. Dude never finishes a debate as the second he gets backed into a corner he runs away. If he did this, and the above is enforced, I would see his posting going down.

I can't keep track of everyone's shit at the same time. But if everyone individually keeps track of their posts that guartz doesn't reply to and reposts what he needs to respond to whenever he reappears, he can be required to respond or concede the point before being allowed to continue on his latest return. And if he doesn't, he gets a timeout.

[Guyverarmor]

I can't keep track of everyone's shit at the same time. But if everyone individually keeps track of their posts that guartz doesn't reply to and reposts what he needs to respond to whenever he reappears, he can be required to respond or concede the point before being allowed to continue on his latest return. And if he doesn't, he gets a timeout.

As Tyche stated, a brand new poster can come in and do the same shit and spout the same idiotic nonsense Guartz does and his ass would be banned within the week easily.

In all seriousness, I just put him on block because I honestly do not believe you or any of the other mods will actually hold him to the standard of responding or conceding a point before moving on else timeout. Everything else shows me the contrary.

[Gredival]

I mean there was a time before guartz was the special idiot of the subforum. Upon initial exposure, I didn't ban him for his idiocy. I also didn't want to get rid of D44 who was the last person shitting up all the threads -- that was Ksandra.

My entire schtick is free speech John Stuart Mill style

[BerenTebogo]

Maroot was the only reasonable poster that identified as republican/conservative/religious that we've had. Egon was willing to change his mind on a few things but when it came to anything involving religion he was intractable. Maroot and I occasionally (though not in a while) chat on discord in DM about lib vs conservative viewpoints on current events. He was generally open to having his mind changed by a good argument.

[kuronosan]

I can't fucking stand guartz and I'm 100% against banning him.

Sent from my SM-G986U using Tapatalk

[Zealot]

Jesus this is tough to watch.

Sent from my SM-N960U using Tapatalk

[synistar]

Now shovel the last page and then some into the feedback thread.

It's *A* Feedback Thread.

[Zealot]

You know who was the worst? Fondue.

Sent from my SM-N960U using Tapatalk

[Cail]

even when hes not posting, dudes trolling the fuck out of this forum lol

[archibaldcrane]

You know who was the worst? Fondue.

Sent from my SM-N960U using Tapatalk

Fondue's racism is entertaining at least, he has a sense of humor

[Andalusian girls]

this is appropriation

[Draylo]

Stop playing with your food, just ban him already.

whether someone kills someone because they're evil or because god told them so doesn't change the fact you give one a pass to do so and the other a one way trip to jail for life. why should that sort of backwater logic apply to these forums? whether one shits up the forums because they're an idiot instead of a troll, its still shitting up the forums with crappy conspiricy theories instead of interesting discourse. BG is diverse enough as it is without this crap. we don't need it.

if you're so worried about BG becoming an echo chamber and needing to hear the outside craziness of the world... we have only to listen to a trump speech. or the newest conspiracy theory youtube video. or just open a godsdamned yahoo article (any will do) and read the comment section. bonus points if its a transgender article, the vitriol in those posts is enough to etch metal. or just ask any of us cashiers if we've heard any crazy customer rants lately, we often do.

WE. DONT. NEED. THIS. SHIT. the world is screaming crazy from the rooftops, its impossible to be an echo chamber of rationality in these times. we can barely hear ourselves think as it is.

Holy hell, how can people be so closed minded in 2020? Literally crying for bans to anyone they disagree with lmao. When did BG become like this? I remember arguing with tons of different people and never once did I go to spam report because I didn't like their opinion, this is insane. You even have mods giving suspensions to people whom they disagree with their opinions. Then you have posters committing crimes online and they are allowed to post again. I just can't even.

[Draylo]

i didnt even see this thread. Well the whole thing is just funny, I have even PMd mods in the past about Sath openly personally attacking and trolling (nothing to do with opinions on issues just completely bad faith attacks) and not a single one responded. Including Gred and his righteousness. You arent going to get anyone suspended unless the mod disagrees with their opinion.

[mallister]

you must be new here.

[kuronosan]

No, he's just a narcissist.

Sent from my SM-G986U using Tapatalk

[BerenTebogo]

No, he’s a stupid idiot.

[kuronosan]

Por que no los dos??

Sent from my SM-G986U using Tapatalk