Generally speaking, when people speak of free speech issues they speak of the legal right to put a message out there.
Sony had no legal obligation not to release the film regardless of threats... so in that sense it is not a free speech issue. It really depends on which angle you want to approach this from. That said, Anonymous isn't your personal army. For them to do things when it is in their particular interest to do so only makes sense.
Are people saying the Bill of Rights should apply to North Korea and they are violating Sony's free speech with terrorist threats? Is that something that is happening in this thread? I really hope that is happening.
As funny as that would be, I believe people are saying that Sony is blocking the creators(edit: the production crew that doesn't include Sony, I'm sensing someone is going to say something here so I'll just edit this now) of the movie's free speech to show the movie. Or perhaps the movie theatres that want to show it or etc and that Sony is prohibiting them.
Because I highly doubt people are trying to say that North Korea is violating Sony's free speech.
Either way, I don't think this falls under freedom of speech. And it's not even the main concern that I have.
Although if you're the person trying to say that North Korea is stamping on Sony's freedom of speech to show a movie, please step forward so I can laugh.
Holy shit people think a free speech issue can only pertain to rights held by Americans? I'm talking about it in general terms. Artists getting threatened over what they create because it hurt someone's feeling is a free speech issue to me. Sony canceling the movie only empowers those threats.
Surprisingly freedom of speech isn't something the entire world feels obligated to abide by. And the point I was making was if people were saying that North Korea oppressing Sony would be ridiculous.
I feel this whole thing is a joke by some hacker kiddies anyways and people are getting their panties in a bunch.
I'm 99% sure though that this isn't Sony trying to hurt the freedom of speech here of this movie. That's not even a piece of what this is about. And honing in on that being the issue is silly.
The real issue is that we're succumbing to internet threats and Sony Pictures lack of protection on their fucking systems is egregious.
Generally speaking, that is what people are referring to when they talk of free speech.
The problem is that you're speaking separate languages even though you're using the same words.
Clearly there is an issue outside of the rights of Americans. Morally, whoever carried out the attack is in the wrong; where do you go from there?
I don't have much to say about this aside from the comment that was made about Anon not wanting to fight a battle that does not pertain to them as if to call them hypocrites (because I also don't care all that much); but this is outside the scope of what they would normally handle and they don't seem to particularly care about it.
^
I grant you that (sadly) this document is not law, but
http://www.un.org/Overview/rights.html
Article 19.
Everyone has the right to freedom of opinion and expression; this right includes freedom to hold opinions without interference and to seek, receive and impart information and ideas through any media and regardless of frontiers.
Yo do you guys think if the Senate hadn't let TRIA expire this wouldn't be happening? Niggas is scared without that terrorism insurance
Additionally if this was made by the North Korean government (and not some kids getting their rocks off) this is an issue of basically making threats of violence on American citizens.
Which would be cray as all hell.
And there would be no way that this movie could be so grand or amazing that it would deserve this sort of attention.
But I would sure as hell want to watch it.
Depends on who you ask. My family would say otherwise. The half that you could reach anyways. The other half in North Korea, I have no idea how they feel.
Half of my ancestors were raped/killed and their kids or some of the older generation still talk today. They freak out whenever North Korea is mentioned.
Does your family know of the DarkSeoul attacks and that this kind of thing is par for the course?
I mean, I know its Sony and not SK. Normally I'd be inclined to believe this was a hoax or publicity stunt but our intelligence agencies sure don't seem to think so.
They seem to be pretty convinced it was an attack attack from North Korea.
There is a difference in how South Korea responds to being threatened and how America responds.
History kinda shows that we don't respond in a positive way to being threatened.
I'm no war general. I'm no intelligence agent. But I'd find it hard to believe I'm smarter than North Korea's government agencies.
My guess is Kim Jong Un googled his own name, saw "The Interview" and got butt-hurt that someone was making fun of him. So he hired some hackers, and then had them threaten Sony to to "save his honor".
Actually, scratch that. I don't think he has the intelligence to think up that plan.