transcrackerjack
transcrackerjack
transwhitedevil
while im not willing to make the leap and claim he was a nigga, he does have some field qualities
Jesus would've been brown tbh
jesus is son of god
u gaiz are retarded
Gred has been doin work in the poli section. I feel bad i went insane on him and told him i wasn't giving him a mandau before kicking him.
Grills were manipulating me.
Spoiler: show
Well, in a clinical setting, they don't say being trans is a disorder, but that trans people suffer from a disorder from not being able to achieve the transition that they want. It's the difference between saying Charlie is disordered and Charlie has a disorder because he lost his job/went to war/had his family murdered.
In real life, most trans people won't tell you that you triggered them by calling them mentally ill. They might shiv you, depending on what kind of trans we're talking about. I doubt most of the trans people involved in these online discussions are the ones out on the street trying to survive.
So in a clinical setting would they say that being epileptic is a disorder or that a person is suffering from a disorder? Is the difference that one has an identity built around it and to call it a disorder would belittle that construct? I feel like im lost in semantics.
So if they do transition, they clinically cease to have a disorder?
In a clinical setting, as part of bed side manner that every health professional has to have training in, it's not considered appropriate to refer to a patient as an epileptic rather than saying that a patient has epilepsy, but you're right. They could be considered the same thing in this example, sans one being more accurate and the other being a shorthand.
But yes, it has to do with the medical establishment's attempts at not treating anything different form the norm as a disorder in of itself unless it causes someone serious social problems. Part of the DSM's criterias are that for something to be considered a disorder, it has to also cause serious disruption in a person's life, such as in work, family and friends. If the disruption ends, the disorder is considered to have subsided.
In that sense, if a transexual transitions successfully and no longer has dysphoria because of it (which can be measured objectively with tests by clinicians), then yes, the transsexual is no longer considered to be suffering from a disorder. You are also correct that transsexual is an identity category, while gender dysphoria is a category for a disorder.
Is this accurate given studies that show such high rates of suicide and regret among post op trans people? I feel like they are still suffering from an illness and that they still don't feel fully transitioned and since they have exhausted all current avenues open to them it will most likely be a pretty big blow to them. Or is it just because even though they personally may feel like they are now the sex they wanted to be it isn't reinforced by the outside world?
And if being able to fully feel comfortable as a trans person requires every person in your daily life to "play along" with your assumed identity does this mean that it is essentially impossible to ever fully heal a trans person in this day and age?
http://waltheyer.typepad.com/blog/20...ot-adjust.html
http://www.theguardian.com/society/2...h.mentalhealth
http://journals.plos.org/plosone/art...l.pone.0016885