Uh, his explaination makes no sense. His comparison is dumb as shit, and the only point he made is why he shouldn't be making laws governing reproduction.
Uh, his explaination makes no sense. His comparison is dumb as shit, and the only point he made is why he shouldn't be making laws governing reproduction.
Person1 wanted to be able to do an gynecological appt over webcam. Person2 says thats dumb.
Person1 says it should be fine, because you can check on a coloscopy by swallowing a webcam.
Person2 says Sarcastically "Oh, can you also swallow a webcam to check on a vagina?" He knows you can't. He's pointing out how Person1's example is irrelevant.
I dont understand what I'm missing here lol.
The point Person 1 was making was that if you can do a colonoscopy via webcam which is a highly intrusive procedure simply by swallowing a small camera, then why is it such a trial to do a gynecological visit via webcam considering it would involve the same usage of camera being inserted into orifice broadcasting over internet. Even with his backpedaling all it shows is that he completely missed the point that their is no issue with doing the procedure via webcam as they already do a similar thing and he instead focused on the irrelevant part that the webcam has to be swallowed for a colonoscopy.
How in the world do you expect a doctor to determine fetal age via a webcam? There's really nothing in common with colonoscopies here, it was a very poor comparison and the guy should have just called it out rather then playing coy.
Unless medically necessary I see no reason why people shouldn't be expected to actually physically go to a doctor to have an abortion. The goals should be to make that easier.
RE: Wage gap, saw this on imgur.
![]()
Its rare to see someone get BTFO that hard. Wow.
I think I'm saving this picture...
Totally saving that.
God damn someone got knocked the fugg out.
Fucking ouch lol.
I can almost hear the feminists crying rape over that.
Exactly why is that rape? Stop trivializing rape by calling shit that isn't rape, rape. You know damn well that has nothing to do with rape.
And why not? Feminists trivialize rape by calling drunk sex "rape" or by calling sex by false promises "rape". You cant have your cake and eat it too.
Someone call the cops because she got raped.
It was a joke because SJWs often compare EVERYTHING is actually worse or equivalent to rape. Twitter harassment? Rape. Asking you to defend your self proclaimed ideals? Rape. Killing a female player (not even player character, the person holding the controller) in a video game? Also rape.
Aksannyi is on record about her stance on jokes equating things to rape. It was a joke to you, but it probably set off her rage-o-meter a bit. I don't know if she goes as far as to say the things you mentioned are rape but it pushes her button when rape is used in that sense.
Yes, Vandal, thank you.
I don't equate drunken sex to rape, and I will argue with people (read: SJWs) over that rule of semantics. I've said it enough times, I'm sure everyone knows it. Rape is not about sex but violence, however, it is a crime that is sexual in nature. A twitter attack is cyber-bullying, but not rape. That tumblr post was not rape, and doesn't equate to rape in the slightest. Anyone who would claim that is an idiot. Even if they're joking. Joking about rape is not, has never been, and will never be funny.