The breaking of superheroes to show that they're still human(ish) is actually a trope. Hard to believe, I know, given that Anita hasn't said anything about it.
http://www.cgccomics.com/news/enews/...e/article9.asp
The breaking of superheroes to show that they're still human(ish) is actually a trope. Hard to believe, I know, given that Anita hasn't said anything about it.
http://www.cgccomics.com/news/enews/...e/article9.asp
bunch of fuckin nerds in here
I saw a bunch of pages from comics where Batman and some other one got raped, and feminists aren't saying diddly shit about those.
He obviously wants superman being subjected to a kryptonite lobotomy. Im sure that would illicit some tears too!
Clearly they're misogynist because real heroes cry in the face of danger.
Protip: That isn't what makes them heroes, and they've cried plenty of times over traumatic events.
People against the cover got death threats. Creator requested DC pull it. The end.
This must have been what it was like to be a rock n roll band in the 50's and being accused of leading america's youth astray.These wild, and horrific accusations proclaiming that any aspect of my makeup line would ever promote the degradation of women, statutory rape, sexual behavior, human trafficking, underage drinking, or even idealization of fleeting youth, goes against everything I stand for. So, please excuse me if I find those articles and comments appalling and inaccurate.
All this gosh darn hip swaying is leading to too much human trafficking and underage sex.
"Underage" does have poor implications though, I mean it's great that it has another meaning for her, but I can see why people are upset by it.
to which she says:
"If you read the word "underage" and you automatically jump to a disgusting conclusion, I ask you to perhaps question your own mind and thoughts." emphasis on questioning your own mind and thoughts.
I don't think it's a terribly unusual conclusion though. It's a fact that to a good percentage of the population, "underage" has a poor connotation. I'm not one of the people asking her to take it off the shelves, hell, I don't give much of a shit about make up, but I can see why people are upset by it.
Really? You can see why people are upset by the name of a lipstick? Because I'm utterly baffled by the fact that people have so fucking little to worry about, how they're completely ignorant of actual problems in our country/the world, that they even have time to be upset about how somebody names a shade of fucking lipstick. If they were upset because they're actually upset by the fact that the stated problems exist (human trafficking, etc) and the fact that they're powerless, so they lash out at anything they could even possibly see as related, then they would be misguided but pitiable. Unfortunately, these fucking retards honestly believe that a goddamn lipstick name actually contributes to those problems, and that makes them retarded beyond measure. I have nothing but contempt for these idiots.
If you're on the hunt for offense, sure. I would argue it isn't a fact that people think underage has poor connotation in the way that the people crying about the name have. They are taking it to the sexual aspect of being underage.
Also, I'd like to bring to light WHO found the lipstick offensive. None other than Parker Marie Molloy. Who is a professional offense-finder. I'm sure if you looked in the gamergate thread or this one, you'd find her bitching about miniscule things
I honestly have no idea who that is, and I have a feeling I don't want to.
I mostly remember her because of this kerfuffle:
http://boingboing.net/2014/04/04/rupaul.html
Social media allows one person who gets annoyed by a nonexistent offense to be retweeted and upvoted until it pops onto clickbait articles giving a voice to something that never would have come up. This is the future welcome to it, it's not going away.
That is the truth. I think it's just a matter of everyone else adjusting to it and ignoring it accordingly