How else can you avoid the vaccine requirements?
How else can you avoid the vaccine requirements?
Maybe vaccines cause feminism
12 female officers over 40 sue the Colorado Springs PD claiming the fitness test is discriminatory after being relegated to desk duty for failing it, win.
http://denver.cbslocal.com/2015/11/1...fitness-tests/
AHAHAHAHAHAHAHA
Why are we, as a people, letting this shit happen? Who do I need to write a letter to?
The case is still going to court, it's not "over", but the injunction was granted - so a "suspend this possibly illegal activity until the courts have had time to rule" type of thing.
Apparently the test went into effect last year, 35% of the women failed it and only 2% of the men did. The optics are bad, so the PD needs to make a convincing case that it's necessary (which is difficult considering they had an apparently fully functional police department before the tests were implemented.)
Sounds to me like the tests might have been designed with men in mind, which is something they could have fixed rather than eliminating the tests entirely.
Or you know, the rational approach of giving different tests for men and women, considering there are clear fucking biological differences.
Then the argument is - if the job requires a certain level of physical fitness, wouldn't it apply equally to both sexes?
I'm not against a gender-less standard of fitness for cops. Biological differences which may or may not be relevant aside, you need to do what you need to do - male or female.
The tests may be flawed or skewed or what have you, but I don't think separate tests is a better idea.
We've been letting it happen since we let women vote. It's our fault. Well, it's bitch ass dudes fault because they are basically women anyway. You know alpha bro in 1900 ain't like, damn we need a womans opinion. lol. not even once.
The Army has different standards, and the standards were different because women needed to look neat in appearance, and physically fit, but weren't Infantrymen. If you're going to be Infantrymen, the standard needs to be the same.
For the record, 52 pushups is closer to a womans requirement than it is a mans.
The APFT requirement to pass for a 41 y/o female is 20 pushups.
When I got back from Ranger School and was broke as fuck, couldn't do shit physically but walk really far with a lot of weight without food or sleep, I could still do 20 fucking pushups. You can do 20 pushups if you just tell yourself "hey self, don't be a fucking bitch and just knock out 20". It's really easy, you just do it and it happens. All of the APFT requirements are in the realm of man up, and you can do it though.
No reason to ever fail a PT test, if you fail you deserve to get shitcanned because you really are shit.
It should, I don't know if a lot of places run separate requirements but I know the Army does (as mentioned above) because females weren't infantry.
I am genuinely shocked the first ruling went the way it did because, honestly, who wants their health and safety left up to people who couldn't save you if their lives depended on it?
I'm guessing there must be something wonky with the specific test. It's the only thing that makes even a little sense.
How do these people possible have a leg to stand on? If a job requires you to be capable of doing X and you're not capable of doing X then you're fucking out. Gender doesn't enter into it, you're simply not up to doing the job. End of story.
Oh your biology means it's really fucking hard for you to become capable of doing X? Cry me a fucking river and then go complain to Mother Nature but you can take your court case and fucking shove it.
it's good to see the misogyny of the feminist thread is now explicit rather than latent
My phone forbids me from posting JLaw "oh okay /thumbsup.gif" so just imagine that's what you are seeing right now.
It always goes full overt whenever Blubb or Goggle post.
At least Goggle got drunk af that one time and poured his heart out about why he hates mean old women so I can always laugh at him.
Acknowledging that the average woman is emotionally driven rather than logically driven does not imply that I consider them lesser than men. They're simply different.
Here's a fun little flip to the discussion at hand - we're talking about a group of women that knowingly went into a career that is physically demanding. Physical ability is men's primary domain, because thanks biology. It's where we excel. Women, on the other hand, excel at things requiring sensitivity and empathy. Imagine for a moment, that instead of women choosing to go into a physically demanding career, this was a case about men choosing to go into a sensitivity demanding career (e.g. social worker). If 12 dudes got forbidden from seeing children because they weren't very good at talking to and understanding children, nobody would bat an eye. If there was a court case, it definitely would not have gone in their favor.
I think it's also interesting to point out how men avoid careers they, on average, would tend to be bad at, whereas women seem to intentionally seek them out because "equality."