I didn't argue that privilege doesn't exist, simply that many proponents of privilege don't see beyond your skin color. Those people are the ones who need that article.
eh; it may be more common, but nothing is absolute. You could be a white person working for a black boss, who's higher up is black, and the CEO of the company is also black. I don't think a white person in this company would have ANY privilege here. A black person having troubles at this same job may not be as bad as the white guy's problems.
Looking at it as a group does nothing to help the white man I just described. Just because other people of the same skin color may be privileged, that has no (positive) effect on him at his job (the black bosses may be taking it out on him; so potentially negative).Oh I definitely believe white people can be discriminated against (I have experienced that on at least one occasion), but it's not nearly as large in scope as discrimination against other marginalized groups. The problem is, like you've outlined, when people refuse to listen to someone who had a similar background or experience and look only at color, which is the exact problem in reverse.
It's worse for blacks just because it happens to more blacks? I look at each situation as an individual case. If there are 1 million blacks wronged and 1 white person wronged, I don't look at it like "black have it worse" I look at it like "Damn there are 1,000,001 wronged people right now"
He's probably referring to people like the professor in his story?
Spoiler: show
I was just mocking your phrasing - keep up.
I'm probably the most privileged person who posts here![]()
Wouldn't that be Wop?
I forget the exact details, but that's the gist, yeah. I think he was asking for people to photoshop a picture of her or something, and the joke was pretty unprofessional/offensive, but some dickwad got their panties in a bunch and contacted his job and pointed them to the thread, and he was promptly fired.
He was banned for threatening to sue BG
I remember in a thread, he posted some big name jewelry that he got, and it literally looked like a gem encrusted piece of poo.
Nah, there were some Dubai dudes who posted their Lamborghini/Ferrari in that 'whatchu drivin' thread.'
Right, and there is definitely an element of, "Stop not liking what I like!" that goes on and fuels backlash, but I don't really think it matters if it's porn or Shakespeare. If the representation is unrealistic, not-good things happen. This is partially where I cringe a bit during labeling/identification arguments, or more accurately, those who want to insist they're not different so treat them that way or else. Media serving as a safety bubble or creating unachievable empowerment can coddle this potentially toxic mindset.
Overall, I'm getting the feeling this specific tangent isn't gonna get much traction because "safer" media hasn't approached the subject very often in the mainstream. A film like Mrs. Doubtfire really isn't about a guy wanting to be a girl, it's a guy who wants to be with his kids and does it to pull it off. Then you get comical abominations like White Chicks. On the other hand, recently re-watching the Hercules series on Netflix had an episode where Autolycus (Bruce Campell) and Salmoneus (Robert Trebor) dressed up as women and joined a showgirl troupe to avoid capture. There was almost a feeling they were deliberately portrayed as ugly as possible, but at the same time, the only person who didn't fall for their act, but didn't out them, was Widow Twanky (A recurring character played by Michael Hurst, so maybe a bit of lampshading at play). They even played the Trap card with the warlord chasing them falling for Sal's female persona after a terribly gaudy striptease scene. For a lot of people, scenarios like these are where they maybe get introduced to the notion. Maybe not full-on, but enough where the reaction is more along the lines of, "Eww..." than acceptance.